[TYPE THE COMPANY NAME]
FUR2601 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025
NO PLAGIARISM
[Pick the date]
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of
the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of
the contents of the document.]
, Exam (elaborations)
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025
Course
Fundamental Rights (FUR2601)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
The Bill of Rights Handbook
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and
explanations. Ensure your success with us.
In respect of each of the four different scenarios below, you are required to
consider whether they constitute fair discrimination; unfair discrimination; or
another appropriate word/phrase or concept. Justify and explain your answer
by addressing each of the four points below relating to each individual
scenario: 1. Which of the following laws (if at all or more than one) is
applicable in each scenario? (i) The Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa, Act 200 of 1993; (ii) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996; (iii) The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998; (iv) The Promotion of
Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000; 2. Does the
aggrieved person(s) have standing (locus standi)? 3. Which court(s) has
jurisdiction to adjudicate/decide the matter? 4. What remedies would be
appropriate? Scenario 1: As a woman, there are a few words and phrases I
hear about myself: “Aggressive”, for going after a promotion. “Controlling,”
when I made household decisions. “Crazy,” by someone who didn’t like my
attitude. “Difficult,” when I asked for more money when I had been
contracted to perform a certain assignment. “Bitchy,” when I turned down
another person’s idea. “Emotional” for raising my voice. “Hysterical” for
getting angry, and a “stalker” for being persistent.1 Scenario 2: Caster
Semenya is a person born with differences of sexual development (DSD). She
is prohibited from competing in international sports activities with other
women unless she takes medication to reduce her testosterone levels.
Scenario 3: In recounting the Treason Trial during March 1960, Nelson
Mandela referred to an incident where Justice Kennedy, a white man fluent in
isiZulu responded with the words ‘Sinjalo thina maZulu’ (We Zulus are like
that) in reference to one of Dr Wilson Conco’s medical achievements.2
Scenario 4: Michael was born male but has always identified as female. They
began the process of gender reassignment about a year ago but has not told
anyone about this. Recently she came to work dressed in a skirt, high heels,
FUR2601 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025
NO PLAGIARISM
[Pick the date]
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of
the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of
the contents of the document.]
, Exam (elaborations)
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025
Course
Fundamental Rights (FUR2601)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
The Bill of Rights Handbook
FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and
explanations. Ensure your success with us.
In respect of each of the four different scenarios below, you are required to
consider whether they constitute fair discrimination; unfair discrimination; or
another appropriate word/phrase or concept. Justify and explain your answer
by addressing each of the four points below relating to each individual
scenario: 1. Which of the following laws (if at all or more than one) is
applicable in each scenario? (i) The Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa, Act 200 of 1993; (ii) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996; (iii) The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998; (iv) The Promotion of
Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000; 2. Does the
aggrieved person(s) have standing (locus standi)? 3. Which court(s) has
jurisdiction to adjudicate/decide the matter? 4. What remedies would be
appropriate? Scenario 1: As a woman, there are a few words and phrases I
hear about myself: “Aggressive”, for going after a promotion. “Controlling,”
when I made household decisions. “Crazy,” by someone who didn’t like my
attitude. “Difficult,” when I asked for more money when I had been
contracted to perform a certain assignment. “Bitchy,” when I turned down
another person’s idea. “Emotional” for raising my voice. “Hysterical” for
getting angry, and a “stalker” for being persistent.1 Scenario 2: Caster
Semenya is a person born with differences of sexual development (DSD). She
is prohibited from competing in international sports activities with other
women unless she takes medication to reduce her testosterone levels.
Scenario 3: In recounting the Treason Trial during March 1960, Nelson
Mandela referred to an incident where Justice Kennedy, a white man fluent in
isiZulu responded with the words ‘Sinjalo thina maZulu’ (We Zulus are like
that) in reference to one of Dr Wilson Conco’s medical achievements.2
Scenario 4: Michael was born male but has always identified as female. They
began the process of gender reassignment about a year ago but has not told
anyone about this. Recently she came to work dressed in a skirt, high heels,
