100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

RSK2602 Assignment 1 Semester 2 Memo | Due 20 August 2025

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
9
Grado
A+
Subido en
12-08-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

RSK2602 Assignment 1 Semester 2 Memo | Due 20 August 2025. All questions fully answered. Question 1 1.1 Operational failures caused by staff are driven by error, fraud and data theft. True/False 1.2 Technology and systems are examples of external drivers of operational risk management. True/False 1.3 Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from human error, management failure and fraud or shortcomings in systems or controls. This would include strategic and reputational risk. True/False 1.4 Risk-indifferent requires no changes in the risk/reward balance in return for an increase in risk. This attitude is usually not conducive for taking any risks to enhance the business. True/False 1.5 Self-insurance can be achieved by way of captives. True/False

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
12 de agosto de 2025
Número de páginas
9
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE TO ANSWER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

 Question 1

1. Evaluate the accuracy of each of the following statements. Indicate whether you consider the
statement accurate (true) or not (false) and provide a full motivation for your answer.

1.1. Operational failures caused by staff are driven by error, fraud and data theft.

True
Operational failures from staff typically stem from human error (unintentional mistakes), fraud
(intentional deception for personal gain), and data theft (unauthorized access or theft of information).
These are well-recognized drivers in operational risk management.

1.2. Technology and systems are examples of external drivers of operational risk management.

False
The statement inaccurately classifies technology and systems as external drivers of operational risk
management. Technology and systems are considered internal or underlying risk factors, not external
ones. While external risks include disasters or fraud, technology-related risks, such as system failures
or hacking, are categorized as internal operational issues. Therefore, technology and systems should
not be labeled as external drivers of operational risk.

1.3. Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from human error, management failure and fraud
or shortcomings in systems or controls. This would include strategic and reputational risk.

False
The statement incorrectly includes strategic and reputational risk as part of operational risk. While
operational risk involves factors like human error, fraud, and system failures, it does not encompass
strategic or reputational risks. These two types of risk are classified separately from operational risk
and are considered distinct categories of non-financial risks.

1.4. Risk-indifferent requires no changes in the risk/reward balance in return for an increase in
risk. This attitude is usually not conducive for taking any risks to enhance the business.

False
The statement inaccurately describes the concept of "risk-indifferent." Being risk-indifferent means
there is no adjustment to the risk/reward balance despite an increase in risk, but this does not
necessarily mean it prevents taking risks to enhance the business. In fact, organizations may still take
risks within their established risk tolerance, even if the reward does not directly correlate with the
risk. The statement oversimplifies the relationship between risk attitudes and business strategy,
making it inaccurate.
$3.05
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Aimark94 University of South Africa (Unisa)
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
6575
Miembro desde
6 año
Número de seguidores
3168
Documentos
1326
Última venta
3 semanas hace
Simple & Affordable Study Materials

Study Packs & Assignments

4.2

520 reseñas

5
277
4
124
3
74
2
14
1
31

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes