What is forensic psychology? - correct answer Any application of psychological research, methods,
theory, and practice to a task faced by the legal system
What do forensic psychologist do? - correct answer-consultant to law enforcement
-trial consultant
-forensic evaluator/expert witness
-present psychology to the courts
-polygraph
-profiling
-hypnosis
-psychological autopsy
-false confessions
-eyewitness testimony
Differences between psychology and law? - correct answer Psychology is a science, based on scientific
method, experimentation, and innovation; psychology is more impartial
Law is based on past decisions, legal precedents; law is more adversial
Aggravating or Mitigating Factors - correct answer Aggravating factors are any fact or circumstance that
could increase the severity of a criminal act; examples are recidivism, lack of remorse, amount of harm
to the victim
Mitigating factors are any information or evidence that is presented to the court that might result in
reduced charges or lesser sentencing
, McCleskey v. Kemp - correct answer The 1987 Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality
of the death penalty against charges that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment because minority
defendants were more likely to receive the death penalty than were White defendants.
Baldus Study - correct answer Study used in McClesky v. Kemp that showed black defendants were more
likely to receive death penalty than white defendants, particularly when the victim was white
Frye Test (1923) - correct answer Well recognized standards regarding principles or evidence for a
particular field should determine the admissibility of expert testimony
Federal Rules of Evidence (1975), Rule 702 - correct answer Expert testimony is admissible if scientific,
technical
or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of
fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact
in issue.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) - correct answer US Supreme Court ruled that the
Federal
Rules of Evidence supercede Frye, at
least in federal courts. Under Daubert, judges are the
"gatekeepers" who must determine the
scientific validity of research.
Forensic Evaluator/Expert Witness - correct answer Expert witness: a person who is permitted to testify
at a trial because of special knowledge or proficiency in a particular field that is relevant to the case.
Fact witness: an individual, sometimes a clinical professional such as a forensic psychologist, who has
personal knowledge of events pertaining to the case can testify as to things they have personally
observed or witnessed.
Hired Gun - correct answer An expert with a bias or who adapts his or her expert evidence to the
requirements of the party that calls him/her as a witness. ... "The only reason an expert is permitted to
give opinion evidence is because the facts that form the basis of the opinion are beyond the ken of the
lay observer.