100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025

Puntuación
4.8
(4)
Vendido
18
Páginas
11
Grado
A+
Subido en
11-08-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us. In respect of each of the four different scenarios below, you are required to consider whether they constitute fair discrimination; unfair discrimination; or another appropriate word/phrase or concept. Justify and explain your answer by addressing each of the four points below relating to each individual scenario: 1. Which of the following laws (if at all or more than one) is applicable in each scenario? (i) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 200 of 1993; (ii) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996; (iii) The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998; (iv) The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000; 2. Does the aggrieved person(s) have standing (locus standi)? 3. Which court(s) has jurisdiction to adjudicate/decide the matter? 4. What remedies would be appropriate? Scenario 1: As a woman, there are a few words and phrases I hear about myself: “Aggressive”, for going after a promotion. “Controlling,” when I made household decisions. “Crazy,” by someone who didn’t like my attitude. “Difficult,” when I asked for more money when I had been contracted to perform a certain assignment. “Bitchy,” when I turned down another person’s idea. “Emotional” for raising my voice. “Hysterical” for getting angry, and a “stalker” for being persistent.1 Scenario 2: Caster Semenya is a person born with differences of sexual development (DSD). She is prohibited from competing in international sports activities with other women unless she takes medication to reduce her testosterone levels. Scenario 3: In recounting the Treason Trial during March 1960, Nelson Mandela referred to an incident where Justice Kennedy, a white man fluent in isiZulu responded with the words ‘Sinjalo thina maZulu’ (We Zulus are like that) in reference to one of Dr Wilson Conco’s medical achievements.2 Scenario 4: Michael was born male but has always identified as female. They began the process of gender reassignment about a year ago but has not told anyone about this. Recently she came to work dressed in a skirt, high heels, wearing make-up and a wig and informed everyone that they should be addressed as Michelle. Michelle was told to go home and change as she was embarrassing other staff members and clients. QUESTION 2 (8 marks) Discuss whether the statement below is true by relying on relevant authority, such as provisions of the law; reference to the prescribed study material;3 and case law. “Anyone seeking primary health care at any governmental medical facility in South Africa is required to produce their South African Identity Document. If the person does not possess a South Africa Identity Document, they are turned away from the facility, regardless of the circumstances”.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado








Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
11 de agosto de 2025
Número de páginas
11
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

FUR2601
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
Unique Number:

Due Date: September 2025
QUESTION 1

SCENARIO 1

Applicable law:

This scenario involves sex-based discrimination through derogatory and gender-stereotyped
language in a work or contractual context. It may fall under:

 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, specifically section 9 (equality
clause prohibiting unfair discrimination on grounds of gender).1

 The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000
(PEPUDA), which prohibits unfair gender discrimination in public life.1

 The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA) if the setting is workplace-related.1



Standing

The aggrieved woman has locus standi as a direct victim of discrimination in terms ofTerms of use
section
By making use of this document you agree to:
38 of the Constitution1 and the relevant statutory provisions in PEPUDA and the EEA.
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
$3.04
Accede al documento completo:
Comprado por 18 estudiantes

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Reseñas de compradores verificados

Se muestran los 4 comentarios
3 meses hace

3 meses hace

3 meses hace

3 meses hace

4.8

4 reseñas

5
3
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Reseñas confiables sobre Stuvia

Todas las reseñas las realizan usuarios reales de Stuvia después de compras verificadas.

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
149165
Miembro desde
7 año
Número de seguidores
35995
Documentos
4317
Última venta
1 hora hace

4.2

13557 reseñas

5
7805
4
2688
3
1790
2
455
1
819

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes