HMDVA81
Assignment 4 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: 6 August 2025
QUESTION 1: STUDY TYPE ANALYSIS
This study is typical of a mixed-method research design because it combines both
qualitative and quantitative methods. The use of focus group discussions (FGDs) is a clear
sign of a qualitative approach. FGDs allow for the collection of in-depth information through
open discussions, where participants share their personal experiences, views, and emotions.
This method helps the researchers understand the deeper meaning behind behaviours,
attitudes, and social norms, which are crucial when exploring topics like empowerment,
identity, and roles within communities.
On the other hand, the study also used a quantitative household survey, which is a
hallmark of quantitative research. This method involves structured data collection using
closed-ended questions, enabling researchers to gather measurable data from a larger
population. Quantitative surveys allow for statistical analysis, generalisation of findings, and
testing of specific hypotheses, such as determining the extent to which women have been
economically empowered by the goat farming programme
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
Assignment 4 2025
Unique Number:
Due Date: 6 August 2025
QUESTION 1: STUDY TYPE ANALYSIS
This study is typical of a mixed-method research design because it combines both
qualitative and quantitative methods. The use of focus group discussions (FGDs) is a clear
sign of a qualitative approach. FGDs allow for the collection of in-depth information through
open discussions, where participants share their personal experiences, views, and emotions.
This method helps the researchers understand the deeper meaning behind behaviours,
attitudes, and social norms, which are crucial when exploring topics like empowerment,
identity, and roles within communities.
On the other hand, the study also used a quantitative household survey, which is a
hallmark of quantitative research. This method involves structured data collection using
closed-ended questions, enabling researchers to gather measurable data from a larger
population. Quantitative surveys allow for statistical analysis, generalisation of findings, and
testing of specific hypotheses, such as determining the extent to which women have been
economically empowered by the goat farming programme
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
