PSY 510 Case Study: Duty To Protect (answered) 2020.
Case Study: Duty To Protect Read "Case 4: Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect" on pages 435-436 in your textbook. Once you have read the case study completely, answer the discussion questions below in 350-500 words. Use one to two scholarly resources to support your answer. When appropriate, use in-text citations according to APA formatting. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma? How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01f, 3.04, 3.06, 4.01, 4.02, 4.05, and 8.01 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply? What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principles and enforceable standards, legal standards, and obligations to stakeholders? Can you identify the ethical theory (discussed in Chapter 3) guiding your decision? What steps should Dr. Yeung take to implement her decision and monitor its effect? Aidan is a research participant in this scenario. What are rights to privacy and confidentiality? How was this established? Under the circumstances in this scenario, what are the ethical issues related to his confidentiality and/or privacy?
Escuela, estudio y materia
- Institución
- Grand Canyon University
- Grado
- PSY 510 (PSY510)
Información del documento
- Subido en
- 30 de octubre de 2020
- Número de páginas
- 4
- Escrito en
- 2020/2021
- Tipo
- Caso
- Profesor(es)
- Desconocido
- Grado
- Desconocido
Temas
-
case study duty to protect
-
psy 510 case study duty to protect
-
why is this an ethical dilemma which apa ethical principles help frame the nature of the dilemma how are apa ethical standards 201f
