100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

NR 509 - FINAL EXAM BATE'S INTERACTIVE 2025/2026 VERIFIED SOLUTIONS LATEST EDITION

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
39
Grado
A+
Subido en
10-07-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

NR 509 - FINAL EXAM BATE'S INTERACTIVE 2025/2026 VERIFIED SOLUTIONS LATEST EDITION

Institución
NR 509
Grado
NR 509











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
NR 509
Grado
NR 509

Información del documento

Subido en
10 de julio de 2025
Número de páginas
39
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

NR 509 - FINAL EXAM BATE'S INTERACTIVE
2025/2026 VERIFIED SOLUTIONS LATEST EDITION



A \44-year-old \female \mathematician \presents \to \clinic \with \a \complaint \of \a \mass \in \the \right \breast. \
Her \partner \noticed \this \mass \2 \days \ago, \and \the \patient \feels \guilty \because \she \has \only \had \one \
mammogram \and \does \not \engage \in \breast \self-examination \(BSE) \on \any \regular \basis. \She \has \no \
family \history \of \breast \cancer, \and \her \prior \mammogram \was \ordered \as \a \routine \screening \test \at \
age \43 \years \after \a \brief \discussion \with \her \primary \care \provider. \After \a \thorough \investigation \
reveals \a \benign \cyst, \what \advice \should \be \given \to \this \patient \about \screening \for \breast \cancer \in \
her \age \group?



a. \BSE \is \well \evidenced, \and \all \recommending \agencies \agree \that \it \should \be \taught \and \reinforced.

b. \Clinical \breast \examination \(CBE) \is \superior \to \BSE \and \should \be \a \routine \part \of \annual \
examinations \starting \at \age \30 \years.

c. \This \patient \was \in \compliance \with \the \U.S. \Preventive \Services \Task \F \- \ANS-c. \This \patient \was \in \
compliance \with \the \U.S. \Preventive \Services \Task \Force \(USPSTF) \recommendations \for \her \age \group \
and \risk \factors \prior \to \her \current \complaint.



A \42-year-old \female \website \developer \presents \for \an \annual \preventive \examination \with \
questions \about \breast \cancer \screening. \She \is \concerned \about \the \radiation \exposure \associated \
with \mammography \and \is \interested \in \magnetic \resonance \imaging \(MRI) \as \a \possible \alternative \
for \routine \screening. \She \is \otherwise \healthy \with \no \family \history \of \breast, \ovarian, \or \colon \
cancer. \Which \of \the \following \is \true \about \MRI \as \a \screening \modality \for \breast \cancer \in \the \
general \population?



a. \Breast \cancer \screening \by \MRI \has \been \well \studied \in \the \general \population.

b. \Sensitivity \of \screening \for \breast \cancer \increases \with \breast \MRI \at \the \expense \of \specificity.

c. \This \patient \is \an \ideal \candidate \for \screening \via \breast \MRI \based \on \current \evidence.

d. \Women \at \low \lifetime \risk \of \breast \cancer \(<20%) \are \recommended \to \undergo \screening \MRI.

,e. \Known \BRCA1 \or \BRCA2 \mutation \is \insufficient \c \- \ANS-b. \Sensitivity \of \screening \for \breast \cancer \
increases \with \breast \MRI \at \the \expense \of \specificity.



A \35-year-old \G0P0 \woman \presents \to \clinic \with \a \complaint \of \bilateral \nipple \discharge. \This \
discharge \started \several \weeks \ago \and \has \occurred \at \irregular \intervals \since \that \time. \She \does \
not \complain \of \local \tenderness, \redness, \fever, \or \any \other \systemic \symptoms \aside \from \slightly \
irregular \periods \over \the \last \few \months. \On \examination, \she \is \able \to \express \a \small \amount \of \
discharge, \which \is \sent \to \the \laboratory \and \found \to \be \consistent \with \breast \milk \but \without \any \
signs \of \blood \or \pus. \Screening \laboratories \are \also \sent, \which \reveal \a \normal \blood \count, \
metabolic \panel, \thyroid-stimulating \hormone, \and \human \chorionic \gonadotropin \(HCG) \level. \
Further \laboratories \are \still \pending. \Which \of \the \following \is \the \most \likely \diagnosis?



a. \Mastitis

b. \Ductal \carcinoma \in \situ

c. \Paget \disease \of \the \breast

d. \Occult \pregnancy

e. \Prolactinoma \- \ANS-e. \Prolactinoma



A \22-year-old \G0P0 \undergraduate \student \presents \to \clinic \after \finding \a \breast \mass \on \breast \self-
examination \(BSE) \at \home. \The \mass \is \nontender \without \skin \changes, \erythema, \or \overlying \
swelling. \She \has \heard \that \most \breast \cancers \are \found \by \patients \themselves, \and \she \is \very \
concerned \that \she \may \have \breast \cancer. \Which \of \the \following \is \true \about \BSE \and \self-
detection \of \breast \cancer?



a. \Most \masses \that \women \find \at \home \and \bring \to \a \provider's \attention \turn \out \to \be \malignant.

b. \This \patient \is \more \likely \to \find \a \fibroadenoma \than \a \cancer \on \self-examination.

c. \The \most \likely \breast \mass \this \patient \is \likely \to \find \in \herself \is \an \abscess \complicating \
underlying \mastitis.

d. \Because \of \this \patient's \age, \breast \masses \should \not \be \pursued \with \imaging \and \diagnosis \
because \the \risk \of \cancer \is \so \low.

e. \BSE \is \universally \recommended \because \of \very \high \sensitivity \- \ANS-b. \This \patient \is \more \likely \
to \find \a \fibroadenoma \than \a \cancer \on \self-examination.

,A \48-year-old \female \psychologist \presents \to \clinic \with \concerns \about \her \breast \cancer \risk \after \
an \age-matched \cousin \was \recently \diagnosed \with \this \disease. \This \cousin \is \the \third \family \
member \on \her \father's \side \in \as \many \years \to \be \diagnosed \with \breast \cancer, \including \the \
patient's \own \father, \who \had \surgery \and \subsequent \treatment \3 \years \ago \for \breast \cancer. \The \
patient \has \little \other \knowledge \of \her \family \history, \only \that \her \grandparents \independently \
arrived \from \Eastern \Europe \near \the \end \of \World \War \II \and \were \among \very \few \members \of \their
\family \that \survived \the \war. \The \patient \has \read \about \testing \for \the \breast \cancer \genes \(BRCA1 \

and \BRCA2) \and \desires \further \information \about \whether \this \would \be \appropriate \for \her. \Which \
of \the \following \is \true \about \this \patient's \indications \for \BRCA \testing?



a. \Her \familial \lineage \is \irrelevant \to \her \risk \of \BRCA \genes \and \- \ANS-d. \This \patient \carries \several \
risk \factors \that \together \justify \BRCA \testing.



A \68-year-old \former \paleontologist \presents \to \clinic \with \concerns \about \her \breast \cancer \risk. \Her \
mother \developed \the \disease \in \her \50s \and \died \from \it \in \her \60s. \A \younger \cousin \developed \the \
disease \a \few \years \ago \before \the \age \of \50 \years, \but \this \individual \was \not \tested \for \the \BRCA1 \
and \BRCA2 \genes. \In \addition, \the \patient \suffered \from \lymphoma \in \her \20s \and \had \radiation \to \
the \chest. \She \did \take \hormone \replacement \therapy \for \a \few \years \before \data \emerged \that \this \
may \contribute \to \breast \cancer \risk. \She \has \had \several \abnormal \mammograms \in \her \50s \for \
persistently \dense \breasts \with \subtle \findings, \but \follow-up \biopsies \never \showed \any \malignant \
pathology. \Which \of \the \following \is \true \regarding \magnetic \resonance \imaging \(MRI) \screening \of \
this \patient?



a. \No \agency \recommends \breast \MRI \for \a \patient \such \as \this \one, \who \has \moderately \but \not \
extraordinary \risk \factors \for \b \- \ANS-c. \Regardless \of \recommendations, \the \high \sensitivity \of \breast \
MRI \comes \at \the \expense \of \markedly \decreased \specificity \(i.e., \the \ability \to \rule \out \disease \in \
healthy \breasts).



A \66-year-old \female \museum \curator \presents \for \a \routine \annual \examination. \On \examination, \a \
notably \enlarged \supraclavicular \lymph \node \is \appreciated \on \the \right \side. \The \lymph \node \is \
nontender \and \feels \firm \and \rubbery. \She \denies \any \localized \or \systemic \symptoms \such \as \breast \
lumps, \fevers, \or \night \sweats. \She \has \been \taking \conjugated \estrogen \tablets \for \9 \years \since \
menopause, \though \she \has \not \taken \progestin \compounds \since \she \had \a \hysterectomy \for \heavy \
bleeding \at \age \45 \years. \Which \of \the \following \is \true \about \this \presentation \of \lymphadenopathy?



a. \Breast \cancer \always \presents \with \axillary \lymphadenopathy \because \the \lymphatics \of \the \breast \
uniformly \drain \into \the \axilla.

, b. \Supraclavicular \nodes \are \generally \considered \benign \and \require \no \further \evaluation \or \follow-
up.

c. \Supraclavicular \nodes \are \found \along \the \anterior \edge \of \the \trapezius \muscle \in \the \neck.

d. \Firm, \- \ANS-e. \Metastatic \breast \cancer \cells \may \spread \directly \into \the \infraclavicular \and \then \
supraclavicular \nodes \without \first \causing \notable \changes \in \the \axillary \nodes.



A \24-year-old \graphic \designer \presents \to \clinic \with \a \concern \for \a \breast \mass. \A \rubbery, \mobile, \
nontender \mass \is \palpated \in \the \right \breast \as \described \by \the \patient, \which \is \consistent \with \a \
firbroadenoma. \In \describing \the \location \of \the \mass, \the \examiner \notes \that \it \is \3 \cm \proximal \to \
and \3 \cm \to \the \left \of \the \nipple. \Which \of \the \following \would \be \the \most \appropriate \way \to \
report \this \finding?



a. \"Rubbery, \mobile, \nontender \mass \located \in \right \breast, \in \the \10:30 \position \from \the \nipple"

b. \"Rubbery, \mobile, \nontender \mass \located \in \right \breast, \in \the \lower \outer \quadrant"

c. \"Rubbery, \mobile, \nontender \mass \located \in \right \breast, \in \the \upper \inner \quadrant"

d. \"Rubbery, \mobile, \nontender \mass \located \in \the \left \breast, \upper \outer \quadrant"

e. \"Rubbery, \mobile, \nontender \mass \located \in \right \breast, \in \the \1:30 \position \from \the \nipple" \- \
ANS-a. \"Rubbery, \mobile, \nontender \mass \located \in \right \breast, \in \the \10:30 \position \from \the \
nipple"



A \54-year-old \female \dietician \presents \for \a \routine \annual \examination. \On \review \of \systems, \she \
reports \that \she \has \had \many \breast \findings \over \several \years, \including \one \biopsy \with \normal \
pathology. \She \feels \that \her \breasts \have \become \far \less \lumpy \since \she \underwent \menopause \3 \
years \ago. \Which \of \the \following \is \true \regarding \changes \in \the \breasts \with \menopause?



a. \Transformation \of \breasts \to \primarily \fatty \tissue \with \menopause \decreases \the \sensitivity \and \
specificity \of \mammograms.

b. \Estrogen \in \hormone \replacement \therapy \(HRT) \has \no \effect \on \breast \density \after \menopause.

c. \Glandular \tissue \of \the \breast \atrophies \with \menopause, \primarily \due \to \decrease \in \the \number \
of \lobules.

d. \Breast \density \has \no \genetic \component \and \is \entirely \due \to \estrogen \dose \from \endogenous \
and \exogenous \sources \over \the \lifetime.

e. \Mammography \performs \most \poorly \in \the \menopausal \and \postmenopa \- \ANS-c. \Glandular \tissue \
of \the \breast \atrophies \with \menopause, \primarily \due \to \decrease \in \the \number \of \lobules.
$11.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
Kinyua254

Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Kinyua254 stuvia
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
2
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
110
Última venta
1 semana hace

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes