BLAW 3201 Fry Final Case Studies
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_4t4atv
1. Rosewood Care Suretyship/Main Purpose Rule
Center v. Caterpillar
Type
2. Rosewood Care Judgement reversed in favor of Rosewood, said that Caterpillar received their
Center v. Caterpillar debt for their own benefit
Outcome
3. Mackay v. Four One Year Provision
Rivers Packing Co.
Type
4. Mackay v. Four Reversed in favor of Mackay, said that oral contract could possibly have been
Rivers Packing Co. completed within a year
Outcome
5. Kalas v. Cook type Specially Manufactured Goods
6. Kalas v. Cook Out- Judgement affirmed in favor of Kalas, said that goods were specially manufac-
come tured goods that could not have been resold
7. Reiser V. Dayton Rights that are not assignable
Country Club Com-
pany Type
8. Reiser V. Dayton Judgement affirmed in favor of Dayton, said that you cannot assign personal
Country Club Com- rights & there was an anti-assignment clause in the contract
pany Outcome
9. Aldana v. Colonial Express Prohibition of Assignment
Palms Plaza Type
10. Judgement reversed in favor of Aldana, said that tenant assigned right of
payment and not lease so did not violate the anti-assignment clause
1/3
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_4t4atv
1. Rosewood Care Suretyship/Main Purpose Rule
Center v. Caterpillar
Type
2. Rosewood Care Judgement reversed in favor of Rosewood, said that Caterpillar received their
Center v. Caterpillar debt for their own benefit
Outcome
3. Mackay v. Four One Year Provision
Rivers Packing Co.
Type
4. Mackay v. Four Reversed in favor of Mackay, said that oral contract could possibly have been
Rivers Packing Co. completed within a year
Outcome
5. Kalas v. Cook type Specially Manufactured Goods
6. Kalas v. Cook Out- Judgement affirmed in favor of Kalas, said that goods were specially manufac-
come tured goods that could not have been resold
7. Reiser V. Dayton Rights that are not assignable
Country Club Com-
pany Type
8. Reiser V. Dayton Judgement affirmed in favor of Dayton, said that you cannot assign personal
Country Club Com- rights & there was an anti-assignment clause in the contract
pany Outcome
9. Aldana v. Colonial Express Prohibition of Assignment
Palms Plaza Type
10. Judgement reversed in favor of Aldana, said that tenant assigned right of
payment and not lease so did not violate the anti-assignment clause
1/3
