100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Samenvatting Europees Recht 25/26 Universiteit Leiden

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
10
Subido en
15-06-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

Geen tijd om het boek te lezen? Dit is een betrouwbare samenvatting van het vak Europees Recht aan de Universiteit van Leiden over de Internal Market en de Free Movement of Goods uit het boek European Union Law van Fabian Amtenbrink & Hans Vedder.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
15 de junio de 2025
Número de páginas
10
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Europees recht/European Union Law
Topic: Free Movement of Goods & Internal Market
What is the internal market?
 The Internal Market covers Goods, Persons, Services and Capital.
 Supremacy: EU law trumps MS law
 National rule in place is to be disapplied
 What is do be applied instead?
1. EU law doesn’t specify (negative integration)
2. EU law specifies it (positive integration)
 Negative effects of the EU internal market:
o Goods: Race to the bottom of standards that are necessary to keep
societies together and to progress
o Servies: Private actors playing national state authorities off against
each other
o Persons: Harmful competition between states due to diverging
national currencies
 Solutions:
o Goods: Common rules – Harmonisation
o Services: Central market supervision – EU Competition Law
o Persons: Currency Union with a Central Bank: Euro

Free Movement of Goods: Inbound Dimension
 Material scope:
 The product at stake must be a good
o ‘Products which can be valued in money and which are
capable, as such, of forming the subject of commercial
transactions’ (CJEU, Case 7/68, Commission/Italy (Art
Treasures), para.1)
o Special case: Electricity (CJEU: also a good)
 Personal scope
 Free movement of goods protects goods: these goods must be in
free circulation in Member States (= once imported into one
Member State also a good of third country origin benefits from the
free movement of goods)
 Free movement of goods does not protect persons
o Article 34 TFEU is silent with regard to its personal scope

, o Third-country nationals can rely on Article 34 TFEU provided
that the good that they are ‘representing’ is in free circulation
in Member States
 Step-by-step plan:
Goods:
 Tariff restrictions or Non-tariff restrictions
 Tariff restrictions: Regulation of market access or Domestic
market regulation
 Regulation of market access: Customs/charges having
equivalent effect - Article 28,30 TFEU
 Domestic market regulation: Tax discrimination/protectionism –
Article 110 TFEU
 Non-Tariff restrictions: Regulation of market access or Domestic
market regulation. Both: Quantitative restrictions on
imports/measures having equivalent effect – Article 34 et seqq.
TFEU
 What is a quantitative restriction in imports?
 CJEU, Case 2/73, Geddo:
 ‘Measures which amount to a total or partial restraint of,
according to the circumstances, imports, exports, or goods
coming into a state or leaving the state’.
 What is a measure having an equivalent effect as quantitative
restrictions on import?
 CJEU, Case 8/74 Dassonville [1974] ECR 837:
 ‘’All trading rules enacted by Member States which are capable
of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-
Community trade are to be considers as measures having an
effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.’’
 Consequence: Basically all state measures that may have an
impact on trade are covered by EU law
 Purpose of the free movement of goods is to guarantee market
access

 How to deal with the effects of domestic regulation on market
access?
 ‘’Double burden’’: Indistinctively applicable measures form a
barrier to market access if the imported products are penalised
by being forced to undergo costly adjustments (CJEU, Case
120/78, ‘Cassis de Dijon’).
$6.98
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
LindseyBrittman

Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
LindseyBrittman Universiteit Leiden
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
1
Miembro desde
7 año
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
14
Última venta
1 mes hace

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes