Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 26 páginas
Examen

HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 26 páginas

HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.HSC380 Ethics in HC - Midterm Exam Review (Qns & Ans) - USU 2025.

Vista previa del contenido

HSC380 Ethics in Healthcare

Midterm Exam Review

(Questions & Solutions)

2025




©2025

,1. Case Scenario: In a clinical trial for an innovative cancer therapy, a
patient is enrolled without receiving a simplified explanation of the study
protocols and risks.
Question: Which ethical principle is most directly compromised when
a patient is not provided information in clear, lay terms?
- A. Non-maleficence
- B. Beneficence
- C. Respect for Autonomy
- D. Justice
Correct ANS: C. Respect for Autonomy
Rationale: Informed consent is a manifestation of respecting a
patient’s autonomy. When information is overly complex or not tailored
to the patient’s level of understanding, the patient’s ability to make an
informed decision is undermined.

2. Case Scenario: A 70-year-old patient with advanced dementia faces a
life-sustaining treatment decision. The patient’s previously expressed
wishes are known, but family members now insist on continuation of
treatment.
Question: Which decision-making standard should the healthcare
team primarily use?
- A. Best interest standard
- B. Substituted judgment
- C. Paternalism
- D. Utilitarian approach
Correct ANS: B. Substituted judgment
Rationale: The substituted judgment standard calls for the surrogate
decision-maker to make choices based on the patient’s previously
expressed values and preferences rather than family members’ current
wishes.

3. Case Scenario: During the informed consent process for a genetic
research study, potential participants are overwhelmed by excessive
©2025

, technical details that obscure the essential risks and benefits.
Question: Which of the following modifications would most improve
the informed consent process?
- A. Providing additional research data
- B. Relying solely on written consent forms
- C. Using simplified language and clear summaries
- D. Delegating consent to a research coordinator only
Correct ANS: C. Using simplified language and clear summaries
Rationale: Simplifying the language helps ensure that participants
truly understand the intervention, risks, and benefits, thereby upholding
the ethical standard of informed consent.

4. Case Scenario: In the midst of a pandemic, an intensive care unit
(ICU) has limited beds available. The hospital must decide which patients
receive access to life-saving treatments based on projected survival and
recovery metrics.
Question: Which ethical principle principally supports these allocation
decisions?
- A. Beneficence
- B. Justice
- C. Autonomy
- D. Non-maleficence
Correct ANS: B. Justice
Rationale: Distributive justice focuses on the fair and equitable
allocation of scarce resources in which treatments are provided
according to defined medical criteria, such as likelihood of benefit.

5. Case Scenario: A hospital employs advanced data analytics to predict
patient risks without obtaining explicit consent to use personal health
information.
Question: Which ethical principle is most at risk in this scenario?
- A. Beneficence
- B. Non-maleficence
- C. Autonomy
- D. Justice
©2025

Información del documento

Subido en
9 de junio de 2025
Número de páginas
26
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$15.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
EmilioOchieng
4.1
(24)
Vendido
148
Seguidores
17
Artículos
4032
Última venta
3 meses hace


Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes