100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Restructuring IBanking Interview

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
94
Grado
A+
Subido en
30-05-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

Restructuring IBanking Interview

Institución
Restructuring IBanking Interview
Grado
Restructuring IBanking Interview











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Restructuring IBanking Interview
Grado
Restructuring IBanking Interview

Información del documento

Subido en
30 de mayo de 2025
Número de páginas
94
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Restructuring IBanking Interview
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_9c0usb

1. What is the peck- Senior Secured Credit Facility / Bank Debt
ing order of a Senior Secured Debt / Second Lien Financing
capital structure? Capital Lease Obligations
Senior Notes
Senior Subordinated Notes
Discount Notes
Convertible Debentures
Preferred Stock
Convertible Preferred Stock
Common Stock (Voting)
Common Stock (Non-Voting)

2. What are the 1. Intrinsic Value = DCF
three most com- 2. Relative Valuation =Precedent Transactions (Transaction Comps) & Comparable
mon ways to val- Companies (Market Comps)
ue a company?
Which is best? - All produce an estimate for Enterprise Value
Which will pro-
No one is best; it depends upon quality of inputs and comparables; the best way
duce the highest
to find value is to come up with a range for each method, and then use your
valuation?
judgement to weight them in "triangulating" a conclusive valuation range

It can vary, but generally, transaction comps will produce a higher valuation than
market comps because the transactions include a control premium and, whereas
public company comparables measure value based on minority interest, [and are
not capital-structure neutral]

DCF will often produce a high valuation (though not necessarily higher than
transactions), as it also assumes a controlling interest. Additionally, projections
are often optimistic, [the analysis is based upon a debt-free capital structure],
and the DCF is highly dependent upon a number of variables

3. They aren't reflective of current market trends


, Restructuring IBanking Interview
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_9c0usb

What are the
problems with
using compara-
ble transactions
from 10 years
ago?

4. What is Enter- EV = the value of Operating Assets minus Operating Liabilities
prise Value &
how is it calculat- EV = Market Value of Common Equity + Preferred Equity + Total Debt + Minority
ed? Interest - Excess Cash

Cash is often treated as a Non-Operating Asset in the valuation context, and is
netted against debt

Balance sheet cash is usually assumed as excess cash

5. How do you get Unlevered FCF = [EBIT * (1 - Tax Rate)] + Depreciation + Amortization - Capital
a proxy for Free Expenditures + Change in Working Capital
Cash Flow?
OR = EBITDA - Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization - Capital Expenditures +
Change in Working Capital

6. Describe an in- Legends
teresting finan- - Middle market regional gaming operations, DBA DiamondJacks brand
cial model you - Formed in 2004 to acquire Isle of Capri in Vicksburg and Bossier City
worked on: what - Damages and lost revenues due to Vicksburg flood; new and renovated compe-
were the as- tition posed threat
sumptions, valu- - Purpose of leverage = acquisitions
ation techniques, - Second lien term loan of $65
etc? - Bossier was doing well, esp due to fact that 70% of revenues from DFW, which
was benefitting from oil prices, but approval of Texas gaming would be harmful
- Filed March 2008; Emerged September 2009 with 2014 maturities, First Lien TL


,Restructuring IBanking Interview
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_9c0usb

$162 @ 8.75%, Second Lien TLA $48.7 @ 12.5%, Second Lien TLB $26.3 @ 17%
- Just got an email from one of the guys on the debtor's team telling me that he's
back in BC for round 2

Dynamic / HL Argument
- Represented First Lien SC, with TL of $142, revolver of $15, & swap claim $7.9
- Didn't want to get into a valuation fight; focus was on showing that even if their
valuation was right, they were still coming out with too much leverage
- Argued that recovery to First Lien under Ch.7 liquidation would be more valuable,
based on Debtor's liquidation analysis in disclosure statement [$139.1 = $153.2];
estimated value of new First Lien Note [$115 - $125] based on DCF of note w. 15%
discount rate
- Only financial covenant was Fixed Charge Coverage (FCCR) of 1:1, whereas
comps had 1.25:1
- Plan projected higher revenue growth over the next two years than Wall Street
Analysts were expecting for most peers
- MOR variance showed consistent inability to meet projections
- Had to argue that efficient market exists for bank loan trading due to 2004 Till
decision on appropriate rates for reinstated debt
** volume increase due largely to disintermediation & electronic trading plat-
forms
** Reuters Graph: before 2008, debt trading at $0.90 considered distressed, after
Q1, changed it to $0.80

Types of Analysis
- Expert Report
- Variance analysis and summary memos to lenders on MOR & TWCF
- Valuation using DCF, TC, & MC
- DCF used WACC, which used CAPM
- Debt Capacity using Total Leverage Approach & Interest Coverage Approach
- Debt Comps
- First Lien claim analysis modeling out higher of base / LIBOR


, Restructuring IBanking Interview
Study online at https://quizlet.com/_9c0usb


Important Metrics
- EBITDAM = EBITDA before management fees
- Average Daily Room Rate (ADR) = Room Revenue / # Rooms Earning Revenue
(excludes house use and complimentary)
- RevPAR = Revenue per Available Room = ADR * Occupancy
- % Revenues from Gaming = 81.4% (median)
- Positions per Room = 3.4 (low)
- Promotional Costs / GGR = 26% (high)
- Win / Position / Day = $186.4 (median)

Assumptions
- EBITDA Multiple for 2009 = 6.0x - 7.0x based on: markets, relative size, # of
properties (diversification), historical performance
- WACC = 12%
- Equity Risk Premium = 6%
- Used market cost of debt where possible
- 20 year Treasury
- Unlevered Beta = 0.71
- Levered Beta = 1.67
- Terminal Multiple = 7x
- Comps = Ameristar, Boyd, Isle, Monarch, Penn National, Pinnacle

Cap Structure @ Exit (Includes Accrued Interest & Default Fees)
- First Lien: $162
- Second Lien: $75
- Other Secured Claims: $3
- Unsecured Claims: $3
- Cash: $15
- Administrative Claims: $5

Valuation
$15.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
TestbankSolution Teachme2-tutor
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
203
Miembro desde
2 año
Número de seguidores
96
Documentos
1267
Última venta
1 semana hace
NursingSolution

NursingSolution everthing is in it (EXAMS)

4.8

227 reseñas

5
209
4
6
3
2
2
4
1
6

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes