Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 34 páginas
Caso

D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 34 páginas

D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design & Quality Assurance - Objective Assessment - WGU 2025

Vista previa del contenido

D480 ITSW 3151 Software Design &
Quality Assurance

Objective Assessment Review

(Questions & Solutions)

2025




©2025

, Question 1
An enterprise system is being redesigned to improve maintainability.
Which SOLID principle specifically advises that a class should have only
one reason to change?
- A. Open/Closed Principle
- B. Single Responsibility Principle
- C. Liskov Substitution Principle
- D. Interface Segregation Principle

ANS: B
Rationale: The Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) states that a class
should have one, and only one, reason to change. This reduces
complexity by ensuring that each class addresses a single functionality or
concern.

---

Question 2
In a scenario where a large-scale distributed system must be designed to
handle independent feature deployments and minimize
interdependencies, which architectural style is most beneficial?
- A. Monolithic architecture
- B. Layered architecture
- C. Microservices architecture
- D. Client–server architecture

ANS: C
Rationale: A microservices architecture decomposes an application into
small, loosely coupled services that can be deployed and scaled
independently. This style is particularly advantageous for accommodating
continuous delivery and reducing the impact of changes.

---
©2025

, Question 3
A team of software engineers must add new behavior to objects at
runtime without altering existing class code. Which design pattern best
addresses this need?
- A. Observer Pattern
- B. Strategy Pattern
- C. Decorator Pattern
- D. Adapter Pattern

ANS: C
Rationale: The Decorator Pattern allows behavior to be added
dynamically by “wrapping” an object with a decorator class. This
preserves the existing code while enabling enhanced functionality at
runtime.

---

Question 4
When automating regression tests for a continuously evolving
application, which technique best ensures that changes do not
reintroduce previously fixed defects?
- A. Smoke testing
- B. Performance testing
- C. Regression testing using automated test suites
- D. Exploratory testing

ANS: C
Rationale: Regression testing—especially when automated—ensures
that code modifications do not break or degrade previously working
functionality, making it crucial for continuous integration and
deployment environments.

---


©2025

, Question 5
In assessing software quality for a safety‑critical system, which quality
assurance approach involves formal, structured reviews with a team of
experts to examine software artifacts?
- A. Ad hoc code reviews
- B. Fagan Inspection
- C. Automated unit testing
- D. Pair programming

ANS: B
Rationale: Fagan Inspection is a structured review process used to
detect defects early by having a formal, team‑based examination of
design documents or code, making it particularly important for
safety‑critical systems.

---

Question 6
Which metric is most relevant when measuring the reliability and quality
of a software product during its testing phase?
- A. Lines of code (LOC)
- B. Defect density
- C. Code churn
- D. Cyclomatic complexity

ANS: B
Rationale: Defect density—defined as the number of defects per unit
size of the software—is a key measure of software reliability and quality,
allowing teams to monitor improvements and risk areas throughout the
development lifecycle.

---

Question 7
A software product's design undergoes multiple iterations, and each
©2025

Información del documento

Subido en
28 de mayo de 2025
Número de páginas
34
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Caso
Profesor(es)
Desconocido
Grado
Desconocido
$15.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
EmilioOchieng
4.1
(24)
Vendido
148
Seguidores
17
Artículos
4032
Última venta
3 meses hace


Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes