©THESTAR 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WMGT 101-22A EXAM 3 QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS 100% PASS
AFI 10-245, Antiterrorism - ANS CE shall: have at least 1 engineer at each base must
complete Security Eng AT Planning & Design Course, review, document, and track construction
projects AT compliance, provide vulnerability assessment protection option program (VAPO)
analysis for all critical facilities and off-base leases, and work with the Base Antiterrorism
Officer
Antiterrorism Requirement Planning - ANS 1. UFC 4-020-01
2. Is only the minimum standard required?
3. Yes: construction standoff distance available?
No: UFC 4-020-02 and support manuals
4. If standoff distance is available, apply UFC 4-010-01 and support manuals
Design Basis Threat (DBT) - ANS Baseline threat used in the design of protective measures
Initial DBT - ANS Based on planning team, local intel and Geographic Combatant Command
(COCOM) Theater-Wide threat assessments
Modify Initial DBT - ANS Local threat assessments
Level of Protection - ANS The degree to which an asset is protected, defines the amount of
damage a facility or asset can sustain during an attack
, ©THESTAR 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
LOP: Very low - ANS Progressive collapse is unlikely, but space in and around damaged area
will be unusable and onset of structural collapse occurs. Glazing is likely to be propelled into the
building and cause serious injuries. Doors may be propelled into rooms, presenting serious
hazards.
LOP: Low - ANS Building will not be economically repairable and space in and around
damaged area will not be usable, but progressive collapse will not occur. Glazing will fracture
and may come out of the frame, but does not present a significant injury hazard. Doors may fail
but present minimal hazards.
LOP: Medium - ANS Minor damage, space in and around damaged area can be used and will
be fully functional after cleanup and repairs. Glazing will fracture but remain in the frame.
Doors may stay in frames but will not be reusable.
LOP: High - ANS Minimal to no damage with no permanent definitions. Glazing will not
break. Doors will be reusable.
UFC 4-010-01 - ANS DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. Intent is to reduce
mass casualties, minimize collateral damage to nearby facilities, and facilitate future upgrades
and increases FPCON.
UFC 4-020-01 - ANS DoD Security Engineering Facility Planning Manual. Acts as a starting
point for Garrison Antiterrorism and a quantitative risk-based model. Uses scoring model to
evaluate asset value (0-1.0), threat likelihood (0-1.0), and use of minimum AT standards (<0.5).
Includes cost data and helps establish a DBT and required LOP.
AT/FP misconceptions - ANS 1. Bollards, fences, curbs, and barriers are and adequate
substitution for standoff
2. Existing roads must be moved away from existing buildings
3. All building require standoff
Mandatory design standards - ANS Standard 1: Standoff distance
Standard 6: Progressive collapse
WMGT 101-22A EXAM 3 QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS 100% PASS
AFI 10-245, Antiterrorism - ANS CE shall: have at least 1 engineer at each base must
complete Security Eng AT Planning & Design Course, review, document, and track construction
projects AT compliance, provide vulnerability assessment protection option program (VAPO)
analysis for all critical facilities and off-base leases, and work with the Base Antiterrorism
Officer
Antiterrorism Requirement Planning - ANS 1. UFC 4-020-01
2. Is only the minimum standard required?
3. Yes: construction standoff distance available?
No: UFC 4-020-02 and support manuals
4. If standoff distance is available, apply UFC 4-010-01 and support manuals
Design Basis Threat (DBT) - ANS Baseline threat used in the design of protective measures
Initial DBT - ANS Based on planning team, local intel and Geographic Combatant Command
(COCOM) Theater-Wide threat assessments
Modify Initial DBT - ANS Local threat assessments
Level of Protection - ANS The degree to which an asset is protected, defines the amount of
damage a facility or asset can sustain during an attack
, ©THESTAR 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
LOP: Very low - ANS Progressive collapse is unlikely, but space in and around damaged area
will be unusable and onset of structural collapse occurs. Glazing is likely to be propelled into the
building and cause serious injuries. Doors may be propelled into rooms, presenting serious
hazards.
LOP: Low - ANS Building will not be economically repairable and space in and around
damaged area will not be usable, but progressive collapse will not occur. Glazing will fracture
and may come out of the frame, but does not present a significant injury hazard. Doors may fail
but present minimal hazards.
LOP: Medium - ANS Minor damage, space in and around damaged area can be used and will
be fully functional after cleanup and repairs. Glazing will fracture but remain in the frame.
Doors may stay in frames but will not be reusable.
LOP: High - ANS Minimal to no damage with no permanent definitions. Glazing will not
break. Doors will be reusable.
UFC 4-010-01 - ANS DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings. Intent is to reduce
mass casualties, minimize collateral damage to nearby facilities, and facilitate future upgrades
and increases FPCON.
UFC 4-020-01 - ANS DoD Security Engineering Facility Planning Manual. Acts as a starting
point for Garrison Antiterrorism and a quantitative risk-based model. Uses scoring model to
evaluate asset value (0-1.0), threat likelihood (0-1.0), and use of minimum AT standards (<0.5).
Includes cost data and helps establish a DBT and required LOP.
AT/FP misconceptions - ANS 1. Bollards, fences, curbs, and barriers are and adequate
substitution for standoff
2. Existing roads must be moved away from existing buildings
3. All building require standoff
Mandatory design standards - ANS Standard 1: Standoff distance
Standard 6: Progressive collapse
