100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

construct indices to measure attitudes or opinions

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
14
Grado
A
Subido en
25-04-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

ChatGPT You said: Uploaded image Scan the uploaded image and write its content here ChatGPT said: Here’s the content from the uploaded image: Project 2 Measuring Willingness to Pay for Climate Change Mitigation When designing policies to reduce carbon emissions or air pollution, or to save an endangered species or preserve biodiversity, economists face the problem that markets for environmental amenities are missing. How can the value to people of the abatement of environmental damage be calculated and set against the cost of implementation? A number of methods can be used to estimate the value of abatement. One method, called contingent valuation – a survey-based technique used to access the value of non-market resources – involves asking people directly how much they value the good. Two common ways of obtaining information about willingness to pay (WTP) are: dichotomous choice: presenting individuals with an amount, to which they respond with either ‘yes/willing to pay’ or ‘no/not willing to pay’, and sometimes with a ‘no response’ option a two-way payment ladder: asking individuals to state the minimum and maximum amount they are willing to pay. As with all subjective measures, both of these methods face different kinds of response biases. In this project, we ask whether they give the same results on average. The issue of how to measure WTP for non-market goods such as abatement of pollution is important for policymaking. Incorrectly estimating the WTP may result in too much or too little abatement. We will look at climate change mitigation as an example. Since tackling climate change may entail short-term costs such as reforestation of degraded forests, governments may want to know how much their citizens are willing to pay to reduce carbon emissions as a method of mitigating climate change. In this project you will: compare survey measures of willingness to pay construct indices to measure attitudes or opinions use Cronbach’s alpha to assess indices for internal consistency practice re-coding and creating new variables.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Microeconomics
Grado
Microeconomics









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Microeconomics
Grado
Microeconomics

Información del documento

Subido en
25 de abril de 2025
Número de páginas
14
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Measuring Willingness to Pay 1




PROJECT 2: Measuring Willingness to Pay for Climate Change Mitigation




By:




Name of the Class


Tutor


University


City/State


Date

, Measuring Willingness to Pay 2



Title: Measuring Willingness to Pay for Climate Change Mitigation

According to Li and Kallas (2015), Willingness to Pay (WTP) is simply the most that one

is ready to pay to get something he/she desires—or to avert something unwanted, like

environmental damage. When it comes to climate change and there's no clear price tag,

economists use surveys to get a sense of what people might be willing to pay. One common

approach is called stated preference methods, and a popular one within that is contingent

valuation.

There are a couple of ways these surveys are usually set up, including what's known as

the dichotomous choice format and the two-way payment ladder.

1.1 Dichotomous Choice Format

In a more relatable manner, the target audience is asked something like the statement

below:

"Would you be willing to pay $50 a year to support reforestation projects that help fight climate

change?

Yes / No / No opinion"

The Dichotomous choice format keeps things simple for the target person answering and

makes the data easy to work with—especially when using tools like logistic regression to analyze

the results. However, this format is not perfect. One of the main challenges that this approach

faces is the anchoring effect. As explained by Ding (2023), the anchoring effect is a situation

where the first number of people sees as certain amount of money can have a direct impact even

in the case where it does not match what they would normally be willing to pay. This setup

works a lot like a real-life buying decision—people are simply asked to say “yes” or “no” to a set
$10.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
intothepast

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
intothepast Teachme2-tutor
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
0
Miembro desde
8 meses
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
1
Última venta
-

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes