D184 Task 3 Re-Do - Passed

Student 1 3.12 (Power Function) Student 2 3.42 (Linear Function) Student 3 3.92 (Power Function) Student 4 4.00 (Linear Function) Student 5 2.75 (Linear Function) Student 6 1.51 (Power Function) Student 7 2.00 (Linear Function) Student 8 1.08 (Linear Function) Student 9 1.00 (Average) Student 10 3.21 (Power Function) Student 11 3.75 (Linear Function) Student 12 4.00 (Linear Function) Student 13 3.03 (Power Function) Student 14 4.00 (All) Student 15 4.00 (Power Function) Student 16 3.33 (Linear Function) Student 17 3.17 (Linear Function) Student 18 4.00 (Linear Function) Student 19 4.00 (Power Function) Student 20 4.00 (Linear Function) The summative proficiency scores were determined using the student data and the Marzano Growth Calculator (Empower, 2022). I used the data that was given to me then entered it all into the program to record the results. 3. Disaggregate the data according to student subgroups. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Student 1 (3.12) Student 1 (3.12) Student 2 (3.42) Student 2 (3.42) Student 3 (3.92) Student 3 (3.92) Student 4 (4.00) Student 4 (4.00) Student 5 (2.75) Student 5 (2.75) Student 6 (1.51) Student 6 (1.51) Student 6 (1.51) Student 7 (2.00) Student 7 (2.00) Student 8 (1.08) Student 8 (1.08) Student 9 (1.00) Student 9 (1.00) Student 10 (3.21) Student 10 (3.21) Student 11 (3.75) Student 11 (3.75) Student 12 (4.00) Student 12 (4.00) Student 13 (3.03) Student 13 (3.03) Student 14 (4.00) Student 14 (4.00) Student 15 (4.00) Student 15 (4.00) Student 16 (3.33) Student 16 (3.33) Student 17 (3.17) Student 17 (3.17) Student 19 (4.00) Student 19 (4.00) Student 19 (4.00) Student 20 (4.00) Student 20 (4.00) Avg: 3.15 Avg: 2.36 Avg: 3.19 Avg: 2.89 Avg: 3.33 1. Draw conclusions about student learning based on patterns of scores at the individual student and whole-class level. The data trend shows that the whole-average score increased throughout the assessment collection period. This means that students were successfully learning throughout the lessons and assessments. The data shows that students 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 ,16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 saw at least a 1 point growth from the first assessment to the last assessment. This proves that students were learning throughout the course of the lessons. These students were able to understand at least part of the content that they were learning about. On the other hand, students 2, 5, and 14 remained at the same level throughout the course of the data collection. However, student 14 scored a perfect 4 across the assessments which tells me that they already were at mastery going into this unit. Students 2 and 5 may not have been understanding because they had no growth throughout the unit. There was only one student, student 6, who got worse scores as the assessments were given. This shows me that student 6 did not learn the materials and was not