WWU Phil 107 - Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 questions n
answers latest update already passed
1. reasoning the attempt to justify or support a claim
by providing or finding reasons to
believe it.
2. Paraphrase to say the same thing in ditterent
words. Often adequate paraphrases
will involve completely ditterent
words.
3. G.U.S. General Understanding of Stutt
4. Type I reading casual, everyday sort of reading
5. Type II reading reading with "unusually intense
attention to content".
Always requires "re-reading", and
reflect- ing on a passage to get a
sense of its structure
6. Bare-Bones Paraphrase a short summary of essential content
7. padding 1. Background: information to help
the reader understand the passage,
not what the passage is about.
(Setting, definition, education, frills)
2. Dispensable detail: What the
passage is about, but would make
the paraphrase too long.
(restatement, illustration, excessive
specificity)
,WWU Phil 107 - Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 questions n
answers latest update already passed
8. The MP is the author wrote the passage. why
9. There are four general ways that a SP can be 1.The SP can give a reason to
believe the
connected to a MP: MP
,WWU Phil 107 - Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 questions n
answers latest update already passed
2. The SP can explain why the
MP hap- pened
3. The SP can be a result or
consequence of the MP
4. The SP can give more detail
about the MP
10. [s], support (giving a reason or argument)
11. [e], explanation (explaining why the MP happened)
12. [r], result (describing a result or upshot of the
MP)
13. [q], qualification (giving detail about the MP)
14. [e], etiology (explanation of how the MP came
about)
15. explanation vs etiology As opposed to 'explanation of how
the object in the MP works',
'explanation of who was involved in
the event the MP de- scribes', and so
on. These details about the MP
would be coded with [q].
'etiology' is narrower than
, WWU Phil 107 - Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 questions n
answers latest update already passed
'explanation'.
Think: "why did the MP occur?",
"what brought the MP about?"
answers latest update already passed
1. reasoning the attempt to justify or support a claim
by providing or finding reasons to
believe it.
2. Paraphrase to say the same thing in ditterent
words. Often adequate paraphrases
will involve completely ditterent
words.
3. G.U.S. General Understanding of Stutt
4. Type I reading casual, everyday sort of reading
5. Type II reading reading with "unusually intense
attention to content".
Always requires "re-reading", and
reflect- ing on a passage to get a
sense of its structure
6. Bare-Bones Paraphrase a short summary of essential content
7. padding 1. Background: information to help
the reader understand the passage,
not what the passage is about.
(Setting, definition, education, frills)
2. Dispensable detail: What the
passage is about, but would make
the paraphrase too long.
(restatement, illustration, excessive
specificity)
,WWU Phil 107 - Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 questions n
answers latest update already passed
8. The MP is the author wrote the passage. why
9. There are four general ways that a SP can be 1.The SP can give a reason to
believe the
connected to a MP: MP
,WWU Phil 107 - Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 questions n
answers latest update already passed
2. The SP can explain why the
MP hap- pened
3. The SP can be a result or
consequence of the MP
4. The SP can give more detail
about the MP
10. [s], support (giving a reason or argument)
11. [e], explanation (explaining why the MP happened)
12. [r], result (describing a result or upshot of the
MP)
13. [q], qualification (giving detail about the MP)
14. [e], etiology (explanation of how the MP came
about)
15. explanation vs etiology As opposed to 'explanation of how
the object in the MP works',
'explanation of who was involved in
the event the MP de- scribes', and so
on. These details about the MP
would be coded with [q].
'etiology' is narrower than
, WWU Phil 107 - Ch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 questions n
answers latest update already passed
'explanation'.
Think: "why did the MP occur?",
"what brought the MP about?"
