100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

HED4805 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 (149215) - DUE 16 May 2025

Puntuación
5.0
(2)
Vendido
9
Páginas
28
Grado
A+
Subido en
31-03-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

HED4805 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 (149215) - DUE 16 May 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us.. The textual piece below is taken from the prescribed textbook: Seroto et al. (2020), “Decolonising education in the Global South: historical and comparative international perspectives”, from Chapter 3: Indigenous history and education before colonial times. Read the extract below, and then answer the questions that follow. Extract from the text: Education through practice The indigenous people of southern Africa developed their own methods of sharing knowledge through teaching practical skills. In most instances teaching was through showing, with different skill sets demonstrated for the younger generation to observe. In Southern Africa, the San people who survived by hunting and food gathering for thousands of years, used Stone Age tools to cut up the animals that they hunted. Even though the San were using Stone Age technology, they were very skilled in killing animals. To hunt they used, among other tools, bows, arrows, snares, and slow poison technologies. The bow and arrow method was used to hunt large game such as antelope, buffalo, or eland. The hunter would stalk the game to within about 20m, which is the average distance an arrow can fly. Instead of killing animals instantly, which was not easy because the arrow had no fletching and often missed the target, the San used poisoned arrows to kill the game. The animal would be poisoned slowly to death, which took a few hours to a few days depending on the size of the animal. The sources of the poison were caterpillars, the larvae of a small beetle, poisonous plants, and snake venom, which were put on the arrow. When the arrow struck an animal, the hunters would have to track it until it died. Once the animal fell, the San would cut around the poisoned area and discard the poisoned meat. The Khoi, just like the San people were also skilled at making weapons. Archaeologists discovered that the San also used snares to capture prey as early as 70 000 years ago (Wadley, 2010). Traps and snares have an economic dimension since they reduce the cost of a long search prey, by bringing the animal to the hunter, rather than requiring that the hunter goes after animal (Wadley, 2010). Since the prey was captured remotely, these devices created the time and space for hunters to engage in other activities that included social activities such as rituals. Among the many ways to trap animals, the San would dig funnel-shaped pits near rivers, place a sharp stake in the middle of the pit and cover it with branches. San hunters were expected to observe and understand their prey’s behaviour before they set a snare. The snare that the San set was designed to function without human agency. These snares and traps have provided evidence that indigenous people could grasp and incorporate action across space 100 marks Assignment 01 Due date: 16 May 2025 Unique assignment number: 149215 20 h and time (Wynn & Coolidge, 2003). Snares are also an apt demonstration of high-level cognition because they operate out-of-sight, but not out-of-mind (Wadley, 2010). This non-formal technology education was passed down from generation to generation. The hunting techniques that the San used had been in existence for centuries and were passed onto the younger generations. These hunter-gatherers were able to mark seasons of the year and knew precisely where the plants they used for food and for medicine grew. They also knew how to collect plants and roots without damaging the environment. An environmental skill that the San had was their ability to follow the migration of antelope herds in order to locate where they could get water, so that they would not go thirsty. The San used bowls for cooking whereas the Khoi used vessels for storing water (Bollong, Smith & Sampson, 1997). Traditionally, the San used empty ostrich shells to store water which they carried as bottles (see Figure 3.3). These bottles were often buried in the sand to keep the water cool. Indigenous people also used personal ornaments made from techniques such as beadwork. The making and use of ostrich eggshell beads were commonplace during the LSA (Late Stone Age) and the MSA (Middle Stone Age). In South Africa, ostrich eggshells, which were also used in beadwork, were discovered in Boomplaas and date back 58 000 years (McBrearty & Brooks, 2000). However, the oldest beads discovered were made from seashells. The Khoi were also experienced in craftwork. Most of their bags, clothing, and blankets were made from animal skins, and they used reeds to make mats for sleeping and for covering their houses. Experienced men and women demonstrated the skills of their craft to inexperienced youth who learnt through observation. Both demonstration and observation are fundamental elements of critical thinking, and they enhance a child’s cognitive skills. Practical skills provided by community elders enhanced indigenous people’s ability to learn independently as they observed, listened, and participated in different activities. Learning through language socialisation A distinct characteristic of education for indigenous people was language socialisation. Language acquisition produces culturally competent members of society and in the process of acquiring language, children learn about cultural practices. Schieffelin and Ochs (1986:163) posit that language socialization, is about socialisation through using language (i.e., learning to speak a language to communicate and mix with others in a society), and about using language to acquire social competence (i.e., learning to use appropriate language within specific/different social contexts). It is through language that a child can construct his/her social world. Language socialisation views thinking as a social, rather than individual psychological phenomenon. Cognition begins at the start of social contact in a child’s life. Learning is conceptualised when a more knowledgeable person is engaged with a novice individual through social interaction (Vygotsky, 1978). Lave and Wenger (1991) explain that language socialisation goes beyond just individual interaction, it extends to the participation of a child within broader communities of practice. It emphasises the importance of children’s involvement in participatory roles in their communities. In brief, language socialisation helps us to understand how learners are socialised into appropriate language usage, as well as how they are socialised through language to engage in community cultural routines, activities, and expectations (Schieffelin & Ochs, 1986). The absence of historical recordings of indigenous people’s literature before colonisation has been one of the greatest challenges to anthropologists, historians, and linguistics. However, one cannot ignore the role that language played in the socialisation of indigenous people. A German HED4805/101/0/2025 21 linguist, WHI Bleek, and his sister-in-law Lucy Lloyd, attempted to document the literature of the San. Although there are disagreements among linguistics and anthropologists about Bleek and Lloyd’s work on the San language (e.g. issues about transcription and the translation into English, and the power relations between the informant and the researcher), a careful study of the Bleek and Lloyd records suggests that language played an important role in socialising indigenous people. Older people enjoyed storytelling proverbs and tales that were interwoven with a sense of social and individual identity. With reference to the text provided, answer the following questions: 1.1 Explain which one of the two hunting methods i.e., the use of bows and arrows, or the use of poisoning do you think was the most effective for the San people. (15) 1.2 Briefly discuss the role of education in the hunting way of life for San and Khoi people, and in their struggle for survival in their indigenous environment. (10) Question 2 (25) Write an essay to critically discuss some of the key foci of “the history of education”. Question 3 (25) Write an essay where you first briefly discuss the modern learning theories of Vygotsky (1978), and of Lave and Wenger (1991). Secondly, analyse how these two theories address or relate to language socialisation. Question 4 (25) Write an essay where you evaluate how the Christian missionaries in South Africa influenced the struggle for political liberation during the colonial period. The textual piece below is taken from the prescribed textbook: Seroto et al. (2020), “Decolonising education in the Global South: historical and comparative international perspectives”, from Chapter 3: Indigenous history and education before colonial times. Read the extract below, and then answer the questions that follow. Extract from the text: Education through practice The indigenous people of southern Africa developed their own methods of sharing knowledge through teaching practical skills. In most instances teaching was through showing, with different skill sets demonstrated for the younger generation to observe. In Southern Africa, the San people who survived by hunting and food gathering for thousands of years, used Stone Age tools to cut up the animals that they hunted. Even though the San were using Stone Age technology, they were very skilled in killing animals. To hunt they used, among other tools, bows, arrows, snares, and slow poison technologies. The bow and arrow method was used to hunt large game such as antelope, buffalo, or eland. The hunter would stalk the game to within about 20m, which is the average distance an arrow can fly. Instead of killing animals instantly, which was not easy because the arrow had no fletching and often missed the target, the San used poisoned arrows to kill the game. The animal would be poisoned slowly to death, which took a few hours to a few days depending on the size of the animal. The sources of the poison were caterpillars, the larvae of a small beetle, poisonous plants, and snake venom, which were put on the arrow. When the arrow struck an animal, the hunters would have to track it until it died. Once the animal fell, the San would cut around the poisoned area and discard the poisoned meat. The Khoi, just like the San people were also skilled at making weapons. Archaeologists discovered that the San also used snares to capture prey as early as 70 000 years ago (Wadley, 2010). Traps and snares have an economic dimension since they reduce the cost of a long search prey, by bringing the animal to the hunter, rather than requiring that the hunter goes after animal (Wadley, 2010). Since the prey was captured remotely, these devices created the time and space for hunters to engage in other activities that included social activities such as rituals. Among the many ways to trap animals, the San would dig funnel-shaped pits near rivers, place a sharp stake in the middle of the pit and cover it with branches. San hunters were expected to observe and understand their prey’s behaviour before they set a snare. The snare that the San set was designed to function without human agency. These snares and traps have provided evidence that indigenous people could grasp and incorporate action across space 100 marks Assignment 01 Due date: 16 May 2025 Unique assignment number: 149215 20 h and time (Wynn & Coolidge, 2003). Snares are also an apt demonstration of high-level cognition because they operate out-of-sight, but not out-of-mind (Wadley, 2010). This non-formal technology education was passed down from generation to generation. The hunting techniques that the San used had been in existence for centuries and were passed onto the younger generations. These hunter-gatherers were able to mark seasons of the year and knew precisely where the plants they used for food and for medicine grew. They also knew how to collect plants and roots without damaging the environment. An environmental skill that the San had was their ability to follow the migration of antelope herds in order to locate where they could get water, so that they would not go thirsty. The San used bowls for cooking whereas the Khoi used vessels for storing water (Bollong, Smith & Sampson, 1997). Traditionally, the San used empty ostrich shells to store water which they carried as bottles (see Figure 3.3). These bottles were often buried in the sand to keep the water cool. Indigenous people also used personal ornaments made from techniques such as beadwork. The making and use of ostrich eggshell beads were commonplace during the LSA (Late Stone Age) and the MSA (Middle Stone Age). In South Africa, ostrich eggshells, which were also used in beadwork, were discovered in Boomplaas and date back 58 000 years (McBrearty & Brooks, 2000). However, the oldest beads discovered were made from seashells. The Khoi were also experienced in craftwork. Most of their bags, clothing, and blankets were made from animal skins, and they used reeds to make mats for sleeping and for covering their houses. Experienced men and women demonstrated the skills of their craft to inexperienced youth who learnt through observation. Both demonstration and observation are fundamental elements of critical thinking, and they enhance a child’s cognitive skills. Practical skills provided by community elders enhanced indigenous people’s ability to learn independently as they observed, listened, and participated in different activities. Learning through language socialisation A distinct characteristic of education for indigenous people was language socialisation. Language acquisition produces culturally competent members of society and in the process of acquiring language, children learn about cultural practices. Schieffelin and Ochs (1986:163) posit that language socialization, is about socialisation through using language (i.e., learning to speak a language to communicate and mix with others in a society), and about using language to acquire social competence (i.e., learning to use appropriate language within specific/different social contexts). It is through language that a child can construct his/her social world. Language socialisation views thinking as a social, rather than individual psychological phenomenon. Cognition begins at the start of social contact in a child’s life. Learning is conceptualised when a more knowledgeable person is engaged with a novice individual through social interaction (Vygotsky, 1978). Lave and Wenger (1991) explain that language socialisation goes beyond just individual interaction, it extends to the participation of a child within broader communities of practice. It emphasises the importance of children’s involvement in participatory roles in their communities. In brief, language socialisation helps us to understand how learners are socialised into appropriate language usage, as well as how they are socialised through language to engage in community cultural routines, activities, and expectations (Schieffelin & Ochs, 1986). The absence of historical recordings of indigenous people’s literature before colonisation has been one of the greatest challenges to anthropologists, historians, and linguistics. However, one cannot ignore the role that language played in the socialisation of indigenous people. A German HED4805/101/0/2025 21 linguist, WHI Bleek, and his sister-in-law Lucy Lloyd, attempted to document the literature of the San. Although there are disagreements among linguistics and anthropologists about Bleek and Lloyd’s work on the San language (e.g. issues about transcription and the translation into English, and the power relations between the informant and the researcher), a careful study of the Bleek and Lloyd records suggests that language played an important role in socialising indigenous people. Older people enjoyed storytelling proverbs and tales that were interwoven with a sense of social and individual identity. With reference to the text provided, answer the following questions: 1.1 Explain which one of the two hunting methods i.e., the use of bows and arrows, or the use of poisoning do you think was the most effective for the San people. (15) 1.2 Briefly discuss the role of education in the hunting way of life for San and Khoi people, and in their struggle for survival in their indigenous environment. (10) Question 2 (25) Write an essay to critically discuss some of the key foci of “the history of education”. Question 3 (25) Write an essay where you first briefly discuss the modern learning theories of Vygotsky (1978), and of Lave and Wenger (1991). Secondly, analyse how these two theories address or relate to language socialisation. Question 4 (25) Write an essay where you evaluate how the Christian missionaries in South Africa influenced the struggle for political liberation during the colonial period.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado








Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
31 de marzo de 2025
Número de páginas
28
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

HED4805
Assignment 1 2025
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations

Unique number: 149215

Due Date: 16 May 2025
QUESTION 1

1.1 The Most Effective Hunting Method for the San People (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)

Introduction
Hunting formed the cornerstone of the San people’s survival strategies in southern Africa.
According to Seroto et al. (2020), the San employed various methods, including bows and
arrows as well as poisoning techniques, to secure game. Each method demanded skill,
strategy, and intricate knowledge of the environment. While both approaches showcase the
San’s adaptability and ingenuity, poisoning emerges as a particularly effective strategy when
assessed for its capacity to neutralize large game and reduce direct confrontation.

Bow and Arrow Proficiency

The San’s bow and arrow method relied on careful stalking and proximity. As Seroto et al.
(2020) note, San hunters would approach prey within approximately 20 meters before
releasing an arrow. This close-range technique highlighted the hunters’ stealth and precision
Terms of use
By makingand
but presented a significant challenge: the arrows lacked fletching use of this document
often missed you
theagree to:
target.
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
$3.07
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Reseñas de compradores verificados

Se muestran los 2 comentarios
8 meses hace

6 meses hace

5.0

2 reseñas

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Reseñas confiables sobre Stuvia

Todas las reseñas las realizan usuarios reales de Stuvia después de compras verificadas.

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
149179
Miembro desde
7 año
Número de seguidores
35995
Documentos
4335
Última venta
8 horas hace

4.2

13560 reseñas

5
7807
4
2688
3
1791
2
455
1
819

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes