SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS LAW TODAY; THE ESS
m m m m m m
ENTIALS TEXT & SUMMARIZED CASES, CENGAG
m m m m m
E, 13TH EDITION, ROGER LEROY MILLER-
m m m m m
CHAPTERS 1 - m m m
25, COMPLETE TESTBANK WITH ALL SOLUTIONS
m m m m m m m
WELL EXPLAINED|| GUARANTEED A+
m m m
,1m|mPm am gm e
SOLUTIONSmFORmBUSINESSmLAWmTODAY;mTHEmESSENTIALSmTEXTm&mSUMMARIZE
DmCASES,mCENGAGE,m13TH mEDITION,mROGERmLEROY mMILLER-mCHAPTERSm1m-
m25,mCOMPLETE mTESTBANK mWITH mALL mSOLUTIONS mWELL mEXPLAINED||mGUARANT
EED mA+
CONTENTS
CHAPTERm1:mLegalmand mConstitutionalmFoundationsmof mBusiness
—
AppendixmtomChapterm1:mFindingmand mAnalyzingmthemLaw mCH
APTERm2:mCourtsmand mAlternativemDisputemResolutionmCHA
PTERm3:mEthicsminmBusiness
—
AppendixmtomChapterm3:mCodemof mEthicsmExamplemCHAPTER
4:mTort mLaw
m
CHAPTERm5:mIntellectualmPropertymRights
CHAPTERm6:mInternet mLaw,mSocialmMedia,mand mPrivacym
CHAPTERm7:mCriminalmLaw mand mCybermCrimemCHAPT
ERm8:mAgreement mand mConsiderationminmContractsmCHAP
TERm9:mCapacity,mLegality,mand mEnforceability
CHAPTERm10:mContract mPerformance,mBreach,mand mRemedie
smCHAPTER m11:mSalesmand mLeasemContracts
CHAPTERm12:mPerformancemand mBreachminmSalesmand mLeasemContractsmCHAPT
ERm13:mNegotiablemInstruments
CHAPTERm14:mBanking
CHAPTERm15:mCreditors’mRightsmand mBankruptc
ymCHAPTER m16:mAgencymRelationshipsmin mBusin
essmCHAPTER m17:mEmployment mLaw
CHAPTERm18:mThemEntrepreneur’smOptionsmCH
APTERm19:mCorporations
CHAPTERm20:mInvestormProtection,mInsidermTrading,mand mCorporatemGovernanc
emCHAPTER m21:mAntitrust mLaw mand mPromotingmCompetition
,2m|mPm am gm e
CHAPTERm22:mConsumermLaw
CHAPTERm23:mPersonalmProperty,mBailments,mand mInsurance
CHAPTERm24:mRealmPropertymand mEnvironmentalmLaw mCH
m
APTERm25:mInternationalmand mSpacemLaw
Tablemof mContents
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmFeatures 1
AdaptingmthemLaw mtomthemOnlinemEnvironment 1
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmCasesm
2mCasem1.1 2
Casem1.2 3
Casem1.3 3
ChaptermReview 4
Practicemand mReview 4
Practicemand mReview:mDebatemThis 5
IssuemSpottersm 5
BusinessmScenariosmand mCasemProblems 5
CriticalmThinkingmand mWritingmAssignments m 10
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmAppendixmExhibit m1A–3 11
Exhibit m1A–3m 11
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmFeaturesmAdapti
ngmthemLaw mtomthemOnlinemEnvironment
1. Onemobservermhasmsaid mthat mthemAmericanmlegalmsystemmshould mevaluatemsocialmmed
iamcompaniesmbased monmhowm―theymaffect musmasmcitizens,mnot monlym[onmhow]mtheymaffect mu
smasmconsumers.‖ mWhat mismyourmopinionmof mthismstatement?
Solution
, 3m|mPm am gm e
Thempersonmwhommademthismstatement mclearlymseesmam―citizen‖ masmhavingmdifferent mmotivationsma
nd mconcernsmthanmam―consumer.‖ mPresumably,mamcitizenmismmostlymconcerned mwithmthemgood mof ms
ocietymasmamwhole,mand mthereforemwould mbemopenmtomthemideamof mgovernment mregulationmthat mrestr
icted mthemnegativeminfluencemof msocialmmedia,mregardlessmof mthemFirst mAmendment.mAmconsumer,m
bymcontrast,mwould mbemprimarilymconcerned mwithmhavingmammarketplacemthat moffersmthemwidest mpo
ssiblemvarietiesmof mfreedomm(of mchoice,mof mspeech,metc.)mand mwould mformthat mreasonmbemopposed mt
omgovernment mregulationmof msocialmmedia.mTheremis,mhowever,man margument mtombemmademthat mthem
citizensmthat mmakemupmamsocietymbenefit mwhenmthemmarketplacemof mideas—
mwhethermtheymaremsubjectively
―positive‖ morm―negative‖—ismallowed mtomflourishminmthemabsencemof mgovernment mregulation.
2. TimmCook,mApple‘smchief moperatingmofficer,mhasmsuggested mthat mthemUnited mStatesmCongre
ssmshould mpassmamlawmlimitingmthemabilitymof mApplemand mothermtechmcountriesmtomkeepmconsumermd
atamprivate.mWhymwould mambusinessmexecutivemmakemsuchmamrequest?
Solution
Cookmmaymhavemwanted mtomend mamcontroversymthat mputsmApplemsquarelymat moddsmwithmthemfederal
mgovernment.mAftermall,mlargemcompaniesmsuchmasmApplem relymonmfavorablemtreatment mfrommthemg
overnment minmregulatorymmatters,minternationalmtrademagreements,mand mmanymothermareas.mAlso, ml
argemcorporationsmsuchmasmApplemsometimesmgainmanmadvantagemovermcompetitorsmwhenmtheirmind
ustriesmaremregulated.mFormexample,mApplemhasmsignificant mresources mwithmwhichmtomlobbymCongr
essmformfavorablemtreatment,mand mit mismbettermpositioned mtombearmthemcostsmof mregulationmthanmaremo
ther,msmallermtechmcompanies.mFinally,mApple‘smpositionmasmamchampionmof mconsumermprivacy mwo
uld mbemdamaged mif mit m―caved‖ mandmchanged mitsmstancemwithoutmbeingmforced mtomdomsombymamnew mf
ederalmlaw.
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmCasesm
Casem1.1
1. What m―dangerousmconditions‖ mmight mhavemprompted mthemcitymtomenact mthemordinancesm
at missueminmthismcase?mWhy?
Solution
Asmnoted minmthemfactsmof mthemcase,mbothmordinancesmat missuemincluded manmextensivemrationalemformtheirmado
ption,mstatingmessentiallymthat mamgeographicallymsmallmcitymhasmthemright mtomrestrict ma
businessmfrommoperatingmwithinmthemcitymwhenmthemrestrictionmismformthemsafetymof mthemcity‘smcitize
nsmand mvisitors.
m m m m m m
ENTIALS TEXT & SUMMARIZED CASES, CENGAG
m m m m m
E, 13TH EDITION, ROGER LEROY MILLER-
m m m m m
CHAPTERS 1 - m m m
25, COMPLETE TESTBANK WITH ALL SOLUTIONS
m m m m m m m
WELL EXPLAINED|| GUARANTEED A+
m m m
,1m|mPm am gm e
SOLUTIONSmFORmBUSINESSmLAWmTODAY;mTHEmESSENTIALSmTEXTm&mSUMMARIZE
DmCASES,mCENGAGE,m13TH mEDITION,mROGERmLEROY mMILLER-mCHAPTERSm1m-
m25,mCOMPLETE mTESTBANK mWITH mALL mSOLUTIONS mWELL mEXPLAINED||mGUARANT
EED mA+
CONTENTS
CHAPTERm1:mLegalmand mConstitutionalmFoundationsmof mBusiness
—
AppendixmtomChapterm1:mFindingmand mAnalyzingmthemLaw mCH
APTERm2:mCourtsmand mAlternativemDisputemResolutionmCHA
PTERm3:mEthicsminmBusiness
—
AppendixmtomChapterm3:mCodemof mEthicsmExamplemCHAPTER
4:mTort mLaw
m
CHAPTERm5:mIntellectualmPropertymRights
CHAPTERm6:mInternet mLaw,mSocialmMedia,mand mPrivacym
CHAPTERm7:mCriminalmLaw mand mCybermCrimemCHAPT
ERm8:mAgreement mand mConsiderationminmContractsmCHAP
TERm9:mCapacity,mLegality,mand mEnforceability
CHAPTERm10:mContract mPerformance,mBreach,mand mRemedie
smCHAPTER m11:mSalesmand mLeasemContracts
CHAPTERm12:mPerformancemand mBreachminmSalesmand mLeasemContractsmCHAPT
ERm13:mNegotiablemInstruments
CHAPTERm14:mBanking
CHAPTERm15:mCreditors’mRightsmand mBankruptc
ymCHAPTER m16:mAgencymRelationshipsmin mBusin
essmCHAPTER m17:mEmployment mLaw
CHAPTERm18:mThemEntrepreneur’smOptionsmCH
APTERm19:mCorporations
CHAPTERm20:mInvestormProtection,mInsidermTrading,mand mCorporatemGovernanc
emCHAPTER m21:mAntitrust mLaw mand mPromotingmCompetition
,2m|mPm am gm e
CHAPTERm22:mConsumermLaw
CHAPTERm23:mPersonalmProperty,mBailments,mand mInsurance
CHAPTERm24:mRealmPropertymand mEnvironmentalmLaw mCH
m
APTERm25:mInternationalmand mSpacemLaw
Tablemof mContents
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmFeatures 1
AdaptingmthemLaw mtomthemOnlinemEnvironment 1
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmCasesm
2mCasem1.1 2
Casem1.2 3
Casem1.3 3
ChaptermReview 4
Practicemand mReview 4
Practicemand mReview:mDebatemThis 5
IssuemSpottersm 5
BusinessmScenariosmand mCasemProblems 5
CriticalmThinkingmand mWritingmAssignments m 10
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmAppendixmExhibit m1A–3 11
Exhibit m1A–3m 11
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmFeaturesmAdapti
ngmthemLaw mtomthemOnlinemEnvironment
1. Onemobservermhasmsaid mthat mthemAmericanmlegalmsystemmshould mevaluatemsocialmmed
iamcompaniesmbased monmhowm―theymaffect musmasmcitizens,mnot monlym[onmhow]mtheymaffect mu
smasmconsumers.‖ mWhat mismyourmopinionmof mthismstatement?
Solution
, 3m|mPm am gm e
Thempersonmwhommademthismstatement mclearlymseesmam―citizen‖ masmhavingmdifferent mmotivationsma
nd mconcernsmthanmam―consumer.‖ mPresumably,mamcitizenmismmostlymconcerned mwithmthemgood mof ms
ocietymasmamwhole,mand mthereforemwould mbemopenmtomthemideamof mgovernment mregulationmthat mrestr
icted mthemnegativeminfluencemof msocialmmedia,mregardlessmof mthemFirst mAmendment.mAmconsumer,m
bymcontrast,mwould mbemprimarilymconcerned mwithmhavingmammarketplacemthat moffersmthemwidest mpo
ssiblemvarietiesmof mfreedomm(of mchoice,mof mspeech,metc.)mand mwould mformthat mreasonmbemopposed mt
omgovernment mregulationmof msocialmmedia.mTheremis,mhowever,man margument mtombemmademthat mthem
citizensmthat mmakemupmamsocietymbenefit mwhenmthemmarketplacemof mideas—
mwhethermtheymaremsubjectively
―positive‖ morm―negative‖—ismallowed mtomflourishminmthemabsencemof mgovernment mregulation.
2. TimmCook,mApple‘smchief moperatingmofficer,mhasmsuggested mthat mthemUnited mStatesmCongre
ssmshould mpassmamlawmlimitingmthemabilitymof mApplemand mothermtechmcountriesmtomkeepmconsumermd
atamprivate.mWhymwould mambusinessmexecutivemmakemsuchmamrequest?
Solution
Cookmmaymhavemwanted mtomend mamcontroversymthat mputsmApplemsquarelymat moddsmwithmthemfederal
mgovernment.mAftermall,mlargemcompaniesmsuchmasmApplem relymonmfavorablemtreatment mfrommthemg
overnment minmregulatorymmatters,minternationalmtrademagreements,mand mmanymothermareas.mAlso, ml
argemcorporationsmsuchmasmApplemsometimesmgainmanmadvantagemovermcompetitorsmwhenmtheirmind
ustriesmaremregulated.mFormexample,mApplemhasmsignificant mresources mwithmwhichmtomlobbymCongr
essmformfavorablemtreatment,mand mit mismbettermpositioned mtombearmthemcostsmof mregulationmthanmaremo
ther,msmallermtechmcompanies.mFinally,mApple‘smpositionmasmamchampionmof mconsumermprivacy mwo
uld mbemdamaged mif mit m―caved‖ mandmchanged mitsmstancemwithoutmbeingmforced mtomdomsombymamnew mf
ederalmlaw.
CriticalmThinkingmQuestionsminmCasesm
Casem1.1
1. What m―dangerousmconditions‖ mmight mhavemprompted mthemcitymtomenact mthemordinancesm
at missueminmthismcase?mWhy?
Solution
Asmnoted minmthemfactsmof mthemcase,mbothmordinancesmat missuemincluded manmextensivemrationalemformtheirmado
ption,mstatingmessentiallymthat mamgeographicallymsmallmcitymhasmthemright mtomrestrict ma
businessmfrommoperatingmwithinmthemcitymwhenmthemrestrictionmismformthemsafetymof mthemcity‘smcitize
nsmand mvisitors.
