100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Study guide

Criminal Law - High Distinction

Puntuación
-
Vendido
2
Páginas
21
Subido en
16-06-2020
Escrito en
2019/2020

I achieved a High Distinction on the LPC at BPP (London Holborn) using these notes and used them to secure a job and a training contract at a well-known FTSE 100 company. The LPC is all about having a good set of notes and learning them. Using these notes, you will have all of the key information you will need that I have extracted from the chapters and small group sessions (SGSs). The information is laid out in a digestable and easy-to-read format focusing on the structure that is taught in the SGSs. My advice is to write out these notes over and over again on A4 paper until you can commit them to memory - it's easier than you think! You can then use this to practice exam papers to really put the knowledge into practice which will set you up to achieve the same results as I did.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado










Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
16 de junio de 2020
Número de páginas
21
Escrito en
2019/2020
Tipo
Study guide

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

DOWNLOAD CONSOLIDATION SLIDES FROM VLE

CRIMINAL LITIGATION
 Adversarial system – burden of proof (beyond reasonable doubt) always on prosecution
 All cases commence in Magistrates Court
o In order to decide appropriate court – D invited to indicate ‘plea before venue hearing’ (s17A
Magistrates Courts Act 1980)
o If D enters ‘Guilty’ plea:
 Magistrates carry out sentencing unless nature of offence / history of D exceeding
magistrates powers
 Can be referred to Crown Court under s3 Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act
2000
o If D enters ‘Not Guilty’ plea:
 Magistrates will hear representations from both parties to determine appropriate Court
(s19 MCA 1980)
 Allocation Guidelines – tried summarily unless sentence would clearly be in excess of
magistrates’ powers or where case is unusually complex
 Magistrates sentencing powers (s78 PCC(S)A / s133 MCA 1980):
o 1 or more summary only offence = Maximum 6 months’ imprisonment
o 1 either way offence = Maximum 6 months’ imprisonment
o 2 or more either way offences = Maximum 12 months’ imprisonment
 Types of offences:
o Summary only – Magistrates Court only
o Triable either way – Magistrates Court OR Crown Court
o Indictable only – Crown Court only

CrPR = Criminal Procedure Rules 2015

 Rule 1 – Overriding Objective to deal with cases justly
 Rule 1.1(2) – Court considers interests of all parties

,
, THEFT

 Theft
o Prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the D:
 Dishonestly;
 Appropriated
 Property
 Belonging to another
 With intention permanently to deprive the victim of the property
 s1 Theft Act 1968
o Dishonesty (R v Ghosh)
 Was it dishonest by ordinary standards of reasonable / honest persons?
 Must D realised that what they were doing was dishonest by those standards?
o Appropriation
o Intention to permanently deprive
 Triable E/W:
o Indictment = maximum 7 years imprisonment and/or fine
o Summarily = 6 months imprisonment and/or fine

BURGLARY

ROBBERY

 s8 TA1968 – Theft and accused must either:
a) use force on any person either immediately before or at the time of the theft;
b) put, or seek to put, any person in fear of being, then and there, subjected to force in order to steal
(does not include accidental force)
 Indictable only = maximum life imprisonment

GOING EQUIPED FOR THEFT

 s25 TA 1968
 Triable E/W
o Indictment = 3 years imprisonment
o Summarily = 6 months imprisonment and/or fine

OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSONS

 Common Assault – s39 Criminal Justice Act 1988
o Actus Reus for battery requires unlawful application of force (no injury needed)
o Mens Rea for assault / battery:
 Intention to cause apprehension of immediate unlawful violence
 Subjective recklessness as to that consequence (‘Cunningham’ recklessness)
o Summary only = maximum 6 months imprisonment
 Assault occasioning ABH – s47 OAPA
o ABH must be consequence directly / indirectly of D’s actions
o ABH includes psychiatric shock – mens rea same as assault / battery but if harm is caused then
prosecution need not prove foresight of injury / harm
o Triable E/W:
 Indictment = maximum 5 years imprisonment
 Summarily = maximum 6 months imprisonment and / or fine
$22.51
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada


Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Blumerzz BPP University College Of Professional Studies Limited
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
162
Miembro desde
5 año
Número de seguidores
136
Documentos
17
Última venta
7 meses hace

3.6

11 reseñas

5
2
4
4
3
4
2
1
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes