ADL2601
ASSIGNMENT 1 (SEMESTER 1)..
DUE DATE: March 2025..
PREVIEW:
QUESTION 1
1. Discuss the meaning and nature of judicial review and appeal in the context of administrative law.
ANSWER:
Judicial Review:
Judicial review refers to the process by which courts examine the actions of administrative bodies or
public officials to ensure that they do not exceed their authority or act unlawfully. In administrative law,
judicial review serves as a safeguard against arbitrary or unreasonable decisions made by government
bodies. The courts review whether an administrative decision was made within the bounds of legal
power, whether procedural fairness was observed, and whether the decision was reasonable.
Judicial review does not involve reviewing the merits of the decision itself, but rather ensuring the
decision-making process was fair, lawful, and within the scope of authority. Courts can annul decisions,
mandate corrective action, or issue declarations of unlawfulness.
Appeal:
An appeal, on the other hand, involves a review of the substance or merits of a decision. An appellate
body, often a higher administrative tribunal or court, reviews the facts, legal reasoning, and application
of law in a case. In the context of administrative law, appeals usually occur when an individual or entity
believes that the decision made by a lower administrative body was incorrect based on the facts or law.
While judicial review ensures legality and fairness, an appeal looks at whether the original decision was
correct in substance.
Disclaimer:
The materials provided are intended for educational and informational purposes only. They should not be
submitted as original work or used in violation of any academic institution's policies. The buyer is solely
responsible for how the materials are used.
ASSIGNMENT 1 (SEMESTER 1)..
DUE DATE: March 2025..
PREVIEW:
QUESTION 1
1. Discuss the meaning and nature of judicial review and appeal in the context of administrative law.
ANSWER:
Judicial Review:
Judicial review refers to the process by which courts examine the actions of administrative bodies or
public officials to ensure that they do not exceed their authority or act unlawfully. In administrative law,
judicial review serves as a safeguard against arbitrary or unreasonable decisions made by government
bodies. The courts review whether an administrative decision was made within the bounds of legal
power, whether procedural fairness was observed, and whether the decision was reasonable.
Judicial review does not involve reviewing the merits of the decision itself, but rather ensuring the
decision-making process was fair, lawful, and within the scope of authority. Courts can annul decisions,
mandate corrective action, or issue declarations of unlawfulness.
Appeal:
An appeal, on the other hand, involves a review of the substance or merits of a decision. An appellate
body, often a higher administrative tribunal or court, reviews the facts, legal reasoning, and application
of law in a case. In the context of administrative law, appeals usually occur when an individual or entity
believes that the decision made by a lower administrative body was incorrect based on the facts or law.
While judicial review ensures legality and fairness, an appeal looks at whether the original decision was
correct in substance.
Disclaimer:
The materials provided are intended for educational and informational purposes only. They should not be
submitted as original work or used in violation of any academic institution's policies. The buyer is solely
responsible for how the materials are used.
