,PEN1502 Assignment (COMPLETANSWERS)Semester
1 2025 - DUE 19 March 2025; 100% TRUSTED
Complete, trusted solutions and explanations…WE
WISH YOU A GOOD LUCK
N/B find the questions and answers after the case study
Carefully read the provided case study below, then answer the
following questions that apply to the case study! The case
study involves a man named John Z., currently serving time
on Death Row for the vicious murders of two individuals.
Mr. Z is being evaluated for his competency to be executed,
which includes his ability to understand the crimes he
committed, the moral implications of those crimes, the fact
that he is physically confined to Death Row, the fact that
his impending death is imminent, the fact that death is
permanent and the reason he is being executed (Heilbrun,
Marczyk, & DeMatteo, 2002). According to records, Mr. Z
is the middle child of three children and his parents
divorced when he was four years old (Heilbrun, Marczyk,
& DeMatteo, 2002). His mother remarried when he was
approximately six years old and he did not have any
significant contact with his biological father, who passed
away about fifteen years ago (Heilbrun, Marczyk, &
DeMatteo, 2002). Mr. Z’s mother stated that he was well
adjusted throughout early childhood and did not display
behavioral issues until around the age of twelve (Heilbrun,
Marczyk, & DeMatteo, 2002). Although there are
numerous correlates to take into consideration, there was
no reference as to whether or not Mr. Z was sexually,
mentally, or physically abused as a child, whether he
, suffered from bullying as a child, and whether or not he
associated with other deviants. The criminal behavior in
which Mr. Z took place involved the murder of a man that
he had a homosexual relationship with and the murder of
another unknown individual. Based on Mr. Z’s long history
of behavior issues as a child, sexual promiscuity, extensive
history of family and personal mental health issues, and
long-lasting and serious drug dependency, it is evident that
multiple factors may have contributed to his criminal
actions. His troubled upbringing, marked by instability and
psychological distress, likely played a role in shaping his
behavior. Additionally, his struggles with substance abuse
may have impaired his judgment and heightened aggressive
tendencies. The combination of these elements suggests
that Mr. Z’s actions were influenced not only by personal
relationships but also by deep-seated psychological and
environmental factors. Understanding these complexities is
crucial in assessing his culpability and potential avenues for
rehabilitation. Answer the following questions pertains to
the extract above
: QUESTION 1 1.1 What theories of punishment (e.g.,
retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation) justify
John Z.’s death sentence?
1.2 Does John Z.’s punishment align with the principle of
proportionality in sentencing? Explain how.
1.3 Is the death penalty the most appropriate form of
punishment for John z., or would life imprisonment be a
more just alternative? Provide justifications,
1.4 What are the potential moral and ethical concerns
surrounding John Z.’s execution? 25 Marks
1 2025 - DUE 19 March 2025; 100% TRUSTED
Complete, trusted solutions and explanations…WE
WISH YOU A GOOD LUCK
N/B find the questions and answers after the case study
Carefully read the provided case study below, then answer the
following questions that apply to the case study! The case
study involves a man named John Z., currently serving time
on Death Row for the vicious murders of two individuals.
Mr. Z is being evaluated for his competency to be executed,
which includes his ability to understand the crimes he
committed, the moral implications of those crimes, the fact
that he is physically confined to Death Row, the fact that
his impending death is imminent, the fact that death is
permanent and the reason he is being executed (Heilbrun,
Marczyk, & DeMatteo, 2002). According to records, Mr. Z
is the middle child of three children and his parents
divorced when he was four years old (Heilbrun, Marczyk,
& DeMatteo, 2002). His mother remarried when he was
approximately six years old and he did not have any
significant contact with his biological father, who passed
away about fifteen years ago (Heilbrun, Marczyk, &
DeMatteo, 2002). Mr. Z’s mother stated that he was well
adjusted throughout early childhood and did not display
behavioral issues until around the age of twelve (Heilbrun,
Marczyk, & DeMatteo, 2002). Although there are
numerous correlates to take into consideration, there was
no reference as to whether or not Mr. Z was sexually,
mentally, or physically abused as a child, whether he
, suffered from bullying as a child, and whether or not he
associated with other deviants. The criminal behavior in
which Mr. Z took place involved the murder of a man that
he had a homosexual relationship with and the murder of
another unknown individual. Based on Mr. Z’s long history
of behavior issues as a child, sexual promiscuity, extensive
history of family and personal mental health issues, and
long-lasting and serious drug dependency, it is evident that
multiple factors may have contributed to his criminal
actions. His troubled upbringing, marked by instability and
psychological distress, likely played a role in shaping his
behavior. Additionally, his struggles with substance abuse
may have impaired his judgment and heightened aggressive
tendencies. The combination of these elements suggests
that Mr. Z’s actions were influenced not only by personal
relationships but also by deep-seated psychological and
environmental factors. Understanding these complexities is
crucial in assessing his culpability and potential avenues for
rehabilitation. Answer the following questions pertains to
the extract above
: QUESTION 1 1.1 What theories of punishment (e.g.,
retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation) justify
John Z.’s death sentence?
1.2 Does John Z.’s punishment align with the principle of
proportionality in sentencing? Explain how.
1.3 Is the death penalty the most appropriate form of
punishment for John z., or would life imprisonment be a
more just alternative? Provide justifications,
1.4 What are the potential moral and ethical concerns
surrounding John Z.’s execution? 25 Marks
