100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
23
Grado
A+
Subido en
02-02-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass APPEAL TO AUTHORITY - Illegitimately arguing that a statement is true because an authority fi1111 said so, especially when the statement is outside the authority figure's :111 .1 , ,I expertise. Philosophy is useless. 7he astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said so. AD HOMINEM (AGAINST THE PERSON) - Criticizing the person who makes a claim or argument rather than criticizing the claim or argument itself PERSON 1: 7he federal government shouldn't raise the minimum wage because that would lead to a lot of poor people losing their jobs. PERSON 2: You don't really care about poor people! You're just a se(fish, rich jerk who is worried that goods and services will become more expensive for you personally if the minimum wage goes up. ANECDOTAL FALLACY - Using personal anecdotes or vivid examples, rather than adequate data, to support a broad generalization. 2Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 My great-grandmother smoked four packs a day for seventy years, and she never, got lung cancer. 7herefore, cigarettes don't really cause lung cancer. APPEAL TO IGNORANCE (AD IGNORATIUM) - Arguing that something is true because it can't be proven false. PERSON 1: Airplanes are secretly spraying chemicals to control our minds! PERSON 2: 7hat s a nonsense conspiracy theory. PERSON 1: Can you prove that its not happening? APPEAL TO NATURE - Arguing that something is good because it's natural or that it's bad because it's unnatural or artificial. It's much better to treat illness using natural herbs than with pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals are full of artificial chemicals! APPEAL TO POPULARITY (AD POPULUM) - Arguing that something is true because everyone believes it or that something is good because everyone likes it. Most Americans agree that the death penalty deters crime. 7herefore, the death penalty does deter crime. CIRCULAR REASONING (BEGGING THE QUESTION) - Including or assuming your conclusion as one of your premises-often as a hidden

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Logical Fallacies
Grado
Logical Fallacies










Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Logical Fallacies
Grado
Logical Fallacies

Información del documento

Subido en
2 de febrero de 2025
Número de páginas
23
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam
Questions and Answers 100% Pass


APPEAL TO AUTHORITY - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that a statement is true because

an authority fi1111 said so, especially when the statement is outside the authority

figure's :111 .1 , ,I expertise.


Philosophy is useless. 7he astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said so.


AD HOMINEM (AGAINST THE PERSON) - ✔✔Criticizing the person who makes a

claim or argument rather than criticizing the claim or argument itself


PERSON 1: 7he federal government shouldn't raise the minimum wage because that

would lead to a lot of poor people losing their jobs.


PERSON 2: You don't really care about poor people! You're just a se(fish, rich jerk who

is worried that goods and services will become more expensive for you personally if the

minimum wage goes up.


ANECDOTAL FALLACY - ✔✔Using personal anecdotes or vivid examples, rather than

adequate data, to support a broad generalization.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 1

,My great-grandmother smoked four packs a day for seventy years, and she never, got

lung cancer. 7herefore, cigarettes don't really cause lung cancer.


APPEAL TO IGNORANCE (AD IGNORATIUM) - ✔✔Arguing that something is true

because it can't be proven false. PERSON 1: Airplanes are secretly spraying chemicals to

control our minds! PERSON 2: 7hat s a nonsense conspiracy theory.


PERSON 1: Can you prove that its not happening?


APPEAL TO NATURE - ✔✔Arguing that something is good because it's natural or that

it's bad because it's unnatural or artificial.


It's much better to treat illness using natural herbs than with pharmaceuticals.

Pharmaceuticals are full of artificial chemicals!


APPEAL TO POPULARITY (AD POPULUM) - ✔✔Arguing that something is true

because everyone believes it or that something is good because everyone likes it.


Most Americans agree that the death penalty deters crime. 7herefore, the death penalty

does deter crime.


CIRCULAR REASONING (BEGGING THE QUESTION) - ✔✔Including or assuming

your conclusion as one of your premises-often as a hidden premise.


PERRSON 1: 7his salesman is trustworthy; he's not going to try to sell me something I

don't need just to get the commission.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 2

, PERSON 2: How do you know?


PERSON 1: He told me that all he wants is to help me find the best deal.


COMPOSITION - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that because something is true of each part

of something, it's also true of the whole; or that because something is true of each

member of a group, it's true of the group as a whole.


My greenhouse gas emissions don't make any difference to the climate. Nor does my

neighbor's, or my friend's, or any other individual's emissions. 1herefore, humanity's

greenhouse gas emissions don't make any difference to the climate.


DIVISION - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that because something is true of a group or thing

as a whole, it's also true of each part.


The United States is rich. 1herefore, all Americans are rich.


EQUIVOCATION - ✔✔Using the same word or phrase in two different ways to make it

seem like an argument that works when it really doesn't.


This school is a drug-free zone. Caffeine is a drug, and coffee has caffeine in it.

Therefore coffee isn't allowed in this school


FALSE DICHOTOMY (FALSE DILEMMA) - ✔✔Falsely assuming that there are only

two options in order to argue for oa11 111 1hcm simply by arguing against the other.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 3
$12.49
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada


Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
BrittieDonald Howard Community College
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
399
Miembro desde
2 año
Número de seguidores
162
Documentos
20443
Última venta
1 semana hace
BrittieDonald Study Solutions.

Get Help in Your Due Online and Actual Exams, Assignments with Well Researched and Up-to date Study Materials for Guaranteed Success

3.4

83 reseñas

5
35
4
13
3
7
2
5
1
23

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes