The Lebesgue Integral ∫𝐸 𝑓: 𝑓 Bounded, 𝑚(𝐸 ) < ∞
Note: From now on integration will mean Lebesgue integration unless
otherwise specified.
Let 𝜓 = ∑𝑛 −1
𝑖=1 𝑎𝑖 𝜒𝐸𝑖 on 𝐸, where 𝐸𝑖 = 𝜓 (𝑎𝑖 ) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 | 𝜓(𝑥 ) = 𝑎𝑖 }
Be a simple function (𝑎𝑖 ′𝑠 are distinct and {𝐸𝑖 } disjoint).
Def. For a simple function 𝜓 defined on a set of finite measure 𝐸, define
.
∫𝑬 𝝍 = ∑𝒏𝒊=𝟏 𝒂𝒊 (𝒎(𝑬𝒊 )).
Notice that this definition of ∫𝐸 𝜓 allows us to evaluate the following integral.
Ex. Let 𝑓 (𝑥 ) = 1 if 𝑥 ∈ ℚ ∩ [0,1] = 𝐸1
= 0 if [0,1]~𝐸1 .
Evaluate ∫[0,1] 𝑓 .
Let 𝐸1 = ℚ ∩ [0,1] and 𝐸2 = [0,1]~𝐸1 , then we can write:
𝑓(𝑥 ) = 1(𝜒𝐸1 ) + 0(𝜒𝐸2 ) = 𝜒𝐸2 .
Thus, ∫[0,1] 𝑓 = 1 (𝑚(𝜒𝐸1 )) = 0.
, 2
Lemma: Let {𝐸𝑖 }𝑛
𝑖=1 be a finite disjoint collection of measurable subsets of a set
of finite measure 𝐸. For 1 ≤ 𝑖 ≤ 𝑛, let 𝑎𝑖 be a real number. If
𝜑 = ∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑎𝑖 𝜒𝐸𝑖 on 𝐸 then ∫𝐸 𝜑 = ∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑎𝑖 (𝑚(𝐸𝑖 )).
Proof: The issue here is that {𝑎𝑖 } may not be distinct (i.e., 𝜑 is not written in
canonical form). If we rewrite 𝜑 in canonical form the result readily follows.
𝜑(𝑥)
𝑎2
𝜑(𝑥 ) = 𝑎1 𝜒𝐸1 + 𝑎2 𝜒𝐸2 + 𝑎1 𝜒𝐸3 ;
𝑎1 Let 𝐸 ′ = 𝐸1 ∪ 𝐸3 then we can
Write 𝜑 in canonical form:
𝜑(𝑥 ) = 𝑎1 𝜒𝐸′ + 𝑎2 𝜒𝐸2
𝐸1 𝐸2 𝐸3
Prop. Let 𝜑 and 𝜓 be simple function defined on a set of finite measure 𝐸.
Then
1. for 𝛼, 𝛽 ∈ ℝ ∫𝐸 (𝛼𝜑 + 𝛽𝜓) = 𝛼 ∫𝐸 𝜑 + 𝛽 ∫𝐸 𝜓.
2. if 𝜑 ≤ 𝜓 on 𝐸 then
∫𝐸 𝜑 ≤ ∫𝐸 𝜓.
Proof: Since 𝜑 and 𝜓 are simple we can find a finite disjoint collection of sets
{𝐸𝑖 }𝑛𝑖=1 such that 𝜑 and 𝜓 are constant on each 𝐸𝑖 and 𝐸 = ⋃𝑛𝑖=1 𝐸𝑖 .
𝑦 = 𝜓(𝑥)
𝑦 = 𝜑(𝑥)
𝐸1 𝐸2 𝐸3 𝐸4