100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Exam Summary for Qualitative Innovation Analytics (QIA)

Puntuación
-
Vendido
2
Páginas
30
Subido en
14-03-2020
Escrito en
2018/2019

This summary can be used as preparation for the final exam of the course: "Qualitative Innovation Analytics" in the Sustainable Business and Innovation Master's at Utrecht University. It contains summaries of the lectures used in the course during and core concepts. This exam summary contains only two summaries of required literature, because the literature was NOT a prime focus for the exam. Content page is made visible in order to check if current course structure overlaps. Please do not distribute among fellow students. Search words: Oost, Grounded Theory, Qualitative Innovation Analyitics, QIA, Deductive, Inductive, QCA, Coding, SBI

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado










Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
14 de marzo de 2020
Número de páginas
30
Escrito en
2018/2019
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Qualitative Innovation Analytics

Content:

PART I: EPISTEMOLOGICAL BASIS AND RESEARCH DESIGN

• Introduction and Epistemological Basis
• Research Design – Criteria of a ‘Good’ Research Question (Relevance) and Literature Review
(Disciplinary Embedding)
• Research Design – Formulating Propositions or Hypotheses (Precision) & Choosing the Right
Method (Methodical Functionality)

PART II: INDUCTIVE QUALITATIVE METHODS

• Qualitative data collection - Interviews and how to complement them with other sources of data
• Qualitative data analysis and introduction to grounded theory
• Theorizing from qualitative data and ensuring the quality and rigor in inductive research

PART III: DEDUCTIVE QUALITATIVE METHODS

• Case Selection and Data Analysis for Mono-Causal Relationships: Comparative Case Studies
• Case Selection and Data Analysis for Multi-Causal Relationships: Introduction to QCA
• Case Selection and Data Analysis for Multi-Causal Relationships: Further Features of QCA + Exam
Preparation

Literature summaries:

• Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss (1990), ‘Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and
Evaluative Criteria’. Qualitative Sociology 13 (1), 3-21
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), ‘Building theories from case study research’. Academy of Management
Review, 14(4), 532-550

,PART I: EPISTEMOLOGICAL BASIS AND RESEARCH DESIGN
Session 1: Introduction and Epistemological Basis
Lecture

Figure 1: Research Design Cycle




What is Theory?
Theory: attempts to provide an explanation to phenomena. Some sense of causality
• Grand theories: wide applicable but difficult to operationalize Figure 2: Trade-offs of Theories
(high abstraction)
• Middle range theories: More operational but less widely
applicable (lower abstraction)

Theories help to understand:

1. Whether research question is relevant (see session 2)
2. Which literature needs to be reviewed (see session 2)
3. How to operationalize concepts (see session 3)
4. What kind of data should be collected (see session 6)
5. How to interpret the results (see session 6)

Bottom Line: The whole research design process.

Most importantly: theory helps us to understand real-world phenomena in a parsimonious way.

Deductive research: theory to data Inductive research: data to theory

, Epistemology and Ontology
Reproducibility
From reliability stems the principle of reproducibility: a different researcher should arrive at the same
results using the same methods. However, it is not always possible to completely reproduce research that
for example uses interviews as a method (paradox of reproducibility).

• Is reproducibility an important principle in our view for qualitative research?

Reproducibility can be dealt with in many ways (transcribing, data triangulation, increasing
methodological transparency). However, for a researcher using qualitative methods, the exercise
[question] emphasizes the importance of being comfortable with discussing his/her ontological and
epistemological assumptions to be able to justify the rigor of the research.

Ontology
• Deals with questions starting with “what” - what exists? And how can it be grouped, related within
a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences?

Considerations in Research Design:

• What kind of objects, subjects, and social entities exist in the social world?
• Do social entities exist independently of our perceptions of them?
• Is social reality external to social actors or constructed by them?
• Two opposing ends of perception:
o Objectivism versus constructionism

Objectivism: an ontological position that asserts that social phenomena and their meanings have an
existence that is independent of social actors. It is often an underlying assumption of deductive designs.

• Culture influences social actors, rather than that social actors influence culture

Constructivism: an ontological position that asserts that social phenomena and their meanings are
continually being accomplished by social actors. It implies that social phenomena and categories are not
only produced through social interaction but that they are in a constant state of revision. It is often an
underlying assumption of inductive designs.

• Social actors shape culture within which they live.

Epistemology
• Is about the theory of knowledge. Deals with “how” questions - how can we know things?

Considerations for Research Designs:

• What is (or should be) considered acceptable knowledge?
• Can the social world be studied ‘scientifically’?
• Is it appropriate to apply the methods of the natural sciences to social science research?
• Two opposing ends in perception:
o Positivism versus interpretivism
$7.20
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
SBI Universiteit Utrecht
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
21
Miembro desde
6 año
Número de seguidores
18
Documentos
7
Última venta
3 año hace

5.0

2 reseñas

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes