MBE Multistate Bar Examination
Practice 2025 Exam 2 Review Questions
and Answers | 100% Pass | Graded +
David Mungai
[COMPANY NAME] [Company address]
, MBE Multistate Bar Examination
Practice 2025 Exam 2 Review Questions
and Answers | 100% Pass | Graded +
Question 2041 - The question is: A defendant has been charged
with selling cocaine to a police informant. At trial, the alleged
cocaine no longer exists, and the only evidence that the
substance sold was cocaine is the informant's testimony that it
tasted like cocaine and gave her a cocaine-like sensation. The
informant has no formal training in identifying controlled
substances. Should the court admit the informant's opinion
testimony that the substance was cocaine?
A: No, because identification of a controlled substance requires
an expert with formal training.
B: No, because, without a quantity of the controlled substance for
testing, opinion testimony is insufficient to make a prima facie
case against the defendant.
C: Yes, if the court determines that the informant has sufficient
knowledge and experience to identify cocaine.
D: Yes, provided there is evidence sufficient to support a jury
finding that the - Answer>> C
Question 1945
The question is: A large privately owned and operated shopping
mall is open to the public and includes small shops, major
department stores, and restaurants that are located around a
pedestrian area. It also has several movie theaters, an ice-skating
rink, a small amusement park, and a branch of the local public
library. The mall is advertised as "a small town with a big-town
feel." During shopping hours, a group of 10 protesters gathered in
, the pedestrian area near the entrance to a department store to
denounce the sale of animal fur products in that store. The
protesters were peaceful and did not interfere with traffic into or
out of the store, but they carried signs and vocally communicated
their message to people walking in the area. Mall management
quickly broke up the protest and required the protesters to leave
the mall. The protesters have sued the mall, claiming that their
right to freedom of - Answer>> A
Question 1974 -
The question is: An engineer signed a two-year contract to serve
as the chief safety engineer for a coal mine at a salary of $7,000
per month. The position required the engineer to work
underground each workday. After one week on the job, the
engineer became very ill. He requested testing of the mine air
system, which revealed the presence of a chemical agent to
which the engineer had a rare allergic reaction. The engineer
promptly quit. The coal mine then hired a qualified replacement
for the remainder of the engineer's contract at a salary of $7,500
per month. Assume that no statute or regulation applies. If the
coal mine sues the engineer for breach of contract, is the coal
mine likely to recover damages?
A: No, because an at-will employee has the right to terminate an
employment contract.
B: No, because the risk to the engineer's health excused his
nonperformance of the contract.
C: Yes, be - Answer>> B
Question 2072 -
The question is: 10 years ago, a couple bought a building and
moved into its second-floor apartment with their teenage
daughter. The couple operated a shoe store on the first floor of
Practice 2025 Exam 2 Review Questions
and Answers | 100% Pass | Graded +
David Mungai
[COMPANY NAME] [Company address]
, MBE Multistate Bar Examination
Practice 2025 Exam 2 Review Questions
and Answers | 100% Pass | Graded +
Question 2041 - The question is: A defendant has been charged
with selling cocaine to a police informant. At trial, the alleged
cocaine no longer exists, and the only evidence that the
substance sold was cocaine is the informant's testimony that it
tasted like cocaine and gave her a cocaine-like sensation. The
informant has no formal training in identifying controlled
substances. Should the court admit the informant's opinion
testimony that the substance was cocaine?
A: No, because identification of a controlled substance requires
an expert with formal training.
B: No, because, without a quantity of the controlled substance for
testing, opinion testimony is insufficient to make a prima facie
case against the defendant.
C: Yes, if the court determines that the informant has sufficient
knowledge and experience to identify cocaine.
D: Yes, provided there is evidence sufficient to support a jury
finding that the - Answer>> C
Question 1945
The question is: A large privately owned and operated shopping
mall is open to the public and includes small shops, major
department stores, and restaurants that are located around a
pedestrian area. It also has several movie theaters, an ice-skating
rink, a small amusement park, and a branch of the local public
library. The mall is advertised as "a small town with a big-town
feel." During shopping hours, a group of 10 protesters gathered in
, the pedestrian area near the entrance to a department store to
denounce the sale of animal fur products in that store. The
protesters were peaceful and did not interfere with traffic into or
out of the store, but they carried signs and vocally communicated
their message to people walking in the area. Mall management
quickly broke up the protest and required the protesters to leave
the mall. The protesters have sued the mall, claiming that their
right to freedom of - Answer>> A
Question 1974 -
The question is: An engineer signed a two-year contract to serve
as the chief safety engineer for a coal mine at a salary of $7,000
per month. The position required the engineer to work
underground each workday. After one week on the job, the
engineer became very ill. He requested testing of the mine air
system, which revealed the presence of a chemical agent to
which the engineer had a rare allergic reaction. The engineer
promptly quit. The coal mine then hired a qualified replacement
for the remainder of the engineer's contract at a salary of $7,500
per month. Assume that no statute or regulation applies. If the
coal mine sues the engineer for breach of contract, is the coal
mine likely to recover damages?
A: No, because an at-will employee has the right to terminate an
employment contract.
B: No, because the risk to the engineer's health excused his
nonperformance of the contract.
C: Yes, be - Answer>> B
Question 2072 -
The question is: 10 years ago, a couple bought a building and
moved into its second-floor apartment with their teenage
daughter. The couple operated a shoe store on the first floor of
