, PLS2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE September 2024 ; 100%
TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and
explanations.
Understanding Critical Reasoning: Answer True or False: 1.1
The outcome of this module is to enable students to identify,
construct and evaluate arguments. (2) 1.2 Critical Reasoning
promotes dogmatic reasoning. (2) 1.3 The term ‘Critical
Reasoning’ can be used interchangeably with the terms
‘critical thinking’ and ‘clear thinking.’ (2) 1.4 Critical reasoning
can also be understood as ‘informal logic’. (2) 1.5 Critical
Reasoning does not enable thinkers to think critically and
reflectively. (2) 2. Different kinds of writings and definitions:
2.1 Identify the type of writing in each of the paragraphs or
statements. 2.1.1 Some people believe that even if you can
get away with awful crimes on this earth and are not
punished by the law or your fellow men, such acts are
forbidden by God, who will punish you after death. So even
when it seems to be in your interest to do such a thing it
really isn't. Some people have even believed that if there is
no God to back up moral requirements with the threat of
punishment and the promise of reward, morality is an illusion
(Thomas Nagel – What does it all mean? p. 62). (2) 2.1.2
Arrange each of the arguments below in the standard way
and say whether they are valid. Try to keep track of how you
decide whether each one is valid. (2) 2.2 What kind of
definitions are expressed in the statements below. 2.2.1
Semester 2 2024 - DUE September 2024 ; 100%
TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and
explanations.
Understanding Critical Reasoning: Answer True or False: 1.1
The outcome of this module is to enable students to identify,
construct and evaluate arguments. (2) 1.2 Critical Reasoning
promotes dogmatic reasoning. (2) 1.3 The term ‘Critical
Reasoning’ can be used interchangeably with the terms
‘critical thinking’ and ‘clear thinking.’ (2) 1.4 Critical reasoning
can also be understood as ‘informal logic’. (2) 1.5 Critical
Reasoning does not enable thinkers to think critically and
reflectively. (2) 2. Different kinds of writings and definitions:
2.1 Identify the type of writing in each of the paragraphs or
statements. 2.1.1 Some people believe that even if you can
get away with awful crimes on this earth and are not
punished by the law or your fellow men, such acts are
forbidden by God, who will punish you after death. So even
when it seems to be in your interest to do such a thing it
really isn't. Some people have even believed that if there is
no God to back up moral requirements with the threat of
punishment and the promise of reward, morality is an illusion
(Thomas Nagel – What does it all mean? p. 62). (2) 2.1.2
Arrange each of the arguments below in the standard way
and say whether they are valid. Try to keep track of how you
decide whether each one is valid. (2) 2.2 What kind of
definitions are expressed in the statements below. 2.2.1
