100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary Automatism Scenario Plan

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
2
Subido en
28-07-2024
Escrito en
2023/2024

A clearly structured automatism scenario plan. Used for WJEC exam but applicable for other exam boards. Cases are included. A* standard.

Institución
Grado








Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Nivel de Estudio
Editores
Tema
Curso

Información del documento

Subido en
28 de julio de 2024
Número de páginas
2
Escrito en
2023/2024
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Automatism

 Applicable if D’s act was encouraged by an external cause.
 Defined in the case of Bratty v AG for Northern Ireland as “an act
done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such
as a spasm, a reflex action or convulsion; or an act done by
a person who is not conscious of what he is doing such as an
act done whilst suffering from concussion or whilst
sleepwalking.
 In the Hill v Baxter, a plea of automatism was successful where the
D had been attacked by a swarm of bees.

Actions must be completely involuntary

 AG’s Reference (No. 2 of 1992) – Lorry driver crashed into some cars
on the hard shoulder. He raised the defence of automatism on the
basis that he was ‘driving without awareness’ induced by repetitive
visual stimulus. The defence was not available because reduced or
impaired control is not enough for a defence of automatism. There
must be a ‘total destruction of voluntary control’.

The cause must be external

 R v Wholley – D sneezed causing him to lose control of his steering.
His lorry bumped into the car in front which in turn led to a domino
crash between 7 cars ahead of him. Automatism was allowed
because the attack of sneezing amount to an involuntary action.
 R v T – D was raped and suffered PTSD. Due to this, she committed
a crime. Exceptional stress can be an external factor that can
cause automatism.

Is it likely that D will be able to use the defence?

 The defence of automatism has been known to have rather
harsh application on times.
 In Broome v Perkins, D was in a hyperglycaemic state and drove
home from work erratically, causing significant damage to his car.
He could remember nothing about the journey, but the court held
that because it was a familiar journey, someone in his state should
have been able to get home safely. He could not use the defence.

Self-Induced Automatism

 If D knowingly puts themself in a position of automatism,
then the defence will fail.
 Bailey – D was a diabetic who failed to eat enough after taking
insulin. D became aggressive and hit V over the head with an iron
$4.82
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
eleanortrend

Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
eleanortrend A Level Notes
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
5
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
21
Última venta
7 meses hace

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes