100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary problem 2.4

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
13
Subido en
08-07-2019
Escrito en
2018/2019

Summary for block 1.2 at Erasmus university (). I'm enrolled in international psychology, however the sources and study materials are the same in both psychology courses. Hence, these summaries may also be useful for Dutch students. The summaries are based on at least 2 of the required reading materials. For this course my final grade was a 8.7. Therefore, I hope they will be of assistance in preparation for your exams.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
8 de julio de 2019
Número de páginas
13
Escrito en
2018/2019
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Summary #4
 Correlational research
- Correlational
= demonstrate the existence of a relationship between 2 or more variables, by simply
measuring 2 different variables for an individual  search for patterns/relations
Correlation doesn’t imply causation.
- Experimental
= determine cause and effect, by manipulating one variable and measure the dependent
variable. All other variables are controlled.  if dependent variable indeed is variable 
causal relationship
- Differential
= demonstrate difference between groups. Two variables  2 groups. Obtain scores for
different groups  compare scores

Correlational research scores are presented in a scatter plot.
X/Y axis plot  these two variables (horizontal  X & vertical  Y) taken together  draw
data points

Measuring relationships
1. Direction
= positive correlation relationship  x and y in same direction = x grows  y grows
negative correlation relationship  x and y in opposite direction = as x goes up, y goes down

2. form
linear  data points cluster around a straight line, increase is consistently predictable.
monotonic  the amount of increase/decrease need not be constantly the same number

3. consistency
a correlation coefficient of 1 (or -1) is a strong/the strongest consistency (still not causation)
a correlation coefficient of 0 is no consistency between to variables (no correlation)

non-numerical data
1 score = numerical
1 score = non-numerical
option 1.
 use non-numerical variable as groups  differential research
Give numerical score per group

Compare using
- independent measures test
- analysis of variance

option 2
calculate correlation by giving the non-numerical variables numbers
e.g.; female= 1 & male= 2
 2 scores p.p.  you can calculate consistency!
This is a point-biseral correlation

, 2 variables that are numerical
 organize data in matrix (rows/columns)  fill in frequency of combination in individuals
If both variables have 2 categories use coding
Female 1 succeed 1
Male 2 fail 2

Turn into coded data  phi-coefficient

Prediction
Correlations provide basic information that can be used to make predictions.
Even though it cannot be derived from correlational research which of the variables are
causes/effects.
Regression occurs:
Statistical process:
 predictor variable: X(1st)
Criterion variable: Y (2nd = explained/predicted)

Purpose
= gain better understanding of the unknown variable by demonstrated that it’s related to an
established/known variable

So; known variable is often  predictor
Unknown variable is often  criterion

Reliability/validity
Reliability
= consistency/stability of measurement
Validity
= is the variable that is supposed/claimed to be measured, actually measured?

Correlation research is often done to evaluate theories

Interpreting a correlation coefficient (r)
r2  coefficient of determination
= how much of the variability of variable Y is predicted by variable X

Guidelines for interpreting strength of a correlation
 coefficient of determination strength
0.10 small
0.30 medium
0.50 large

A correlation found in a relatively large sample group  likely to be significant (unlikely to
be caused by another variable)
$3.58
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada


Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
maremenick Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
55
Miembro desde
6 año
Número de seguidores
28
Documentos
84
Última venta
3 año hace

4.4

13 reseñas

5
8
4
2
3
3
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes