Procedure:
Aim:
Screening procedure
Investigating obedience by partially rep
1st Responded to ad or flyer, asked about taking psychology 45 years after Milgram to
Milgram's study finding whether situat
class and childhood trauma. (eliminate all that had) see if people are still as
factors affect obedience.
2nd Second screening with psychologist to determine mental obedient
stability Results:
Sample Experiment 1
Social 70% went to continue after 150 volts
29 males and 41 males, 20- 81 years old Experiment 2
Experiment procedure Contemporary study 63.3% went to continue after 150 volts
Experiment 1 No difference found in gender
People who refused early on to continue sc
Everything same as Milgram's, except confederate learner for desirability for control
revealed they had a heart problem. Burger (2009)
For ethics. Added grunts from learner at 75 volts. At 150 Conclusion:
volts learner protested complaining about heart to let them Results found in both experiment were s
out. Milgram's.
Changes in societies culture didn’t have
If teacher (participant), following verbal prods continued
on obedience.
experiment was forcibly stopped.
People are likely to obey authority figure
Experiment 2
Ethical changes:
Same as exp.1 but had two conferderates.
Protection from harm- Only up to 150 volts
2 Teachers – teacher 1=confederate, teacher 2= participant Protection from harm- mental health screening
At 75 volts teacher 1 refused to continue stopped and Right to withdraw – made aware of their right multiple time
pushed chair away. Once in person
Teacher 2 verbally prodded to continue. Twice on paper
Aim:
Screening procedure
Investigating obedience by partially rep
1st Responded to ad or flyer, asked about taking psychology 45 years after Milgram to
Milgram's study finding whether situat
class and childhood trauma. (eliminate all that had) see if people are still as
factors affect obedience.
2nd Second screening with psychologist to determine mental obedient
stability Results:
Sample Experiment 1
Social 70% went to continue after 150 volts
29 males and 41 males, 20- 81 years old Experiment 2
Experiment procedure Contemporary study 63.3% went to continue after 150 volts
Experiment 1 No difference found in gender
People who refused early on to continue sc
Everything same as Milgram's, except confederate learner for desirability for control
revealed they had a heart problem. Burger (2009)
For ethics. Added grunts from learner at 75 volts. At 150 Conclusion:
volts learner protested complaining about heart to let them Results found in both experiment were s
out. Milgram's.
Changes in societies culture didn’t have
If teacher (participant), following verbal prods continued
on obedience.
experiment was forcibly stopped.
People are likely to obey authority figure
Experiment 2
Ethical changes:
Same as exp.1 but had two conferderates.
Protection from harm- Only up to 150 volts
2 Teachers – teacher 1=confederate, teacher 2= participant Protection from harm- mental health screening
At 75 volts teacher 1 refused to continue stopped and Right to withdraw – made aware of their right multiple time
pushed chair away. Once in person
Teacher 2 verbally prodded to continue. Twice on paper
