MRL3701 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2024 - SEMESTER 1 - UNISA - DUE DATE :- 20 MAY 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)

MRL3701 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2024 - SEMESTER 1 - UNISA - DUE DATE :- 20 MAY 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) Question 1 1.1 When a debtor is sequestrated, a Master is appointed to administer the estate. Answer the following questions regarding the appointment of the Master: (5) (a) In terms of which piece of legislation is the Master appointed? [1] (b) What is the pivotal role and function of the Master? [2] (c) What is meant by saying the Master is a “creature of statute”? [2] 1.2 Certain sections of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 have been amended over time, but it remains one of the oldest statutes of general application still in force. It is therefore difficult to synchronise the application of the Act with legal, economic, technological and commercial advances. It is imperative that the South African Insolvency Law be reformed. Discuss five (5) initiatives that have been identified that can assist in law reform. (5) 1.3 The Eastern Cape High Court has given a judgment of R80 000 against Jonah in favour of Zanele. Upon the demand of the officer whose duty it is to execute the judgment, Jonah fails to satisfy it and also fails to indicate to the officer disposable property sufficient to satisfy the judgment. The return made by the officer states that he has not found sufficient disposable property to satisfy the judgment. Explain to Zanele what the implications of the aforementioned facts may be. (10) 1.4 See the table below and match the columns to answer the following questions. You must therefore match three columns; case name, ratio decidendi of the case, and area of Insolvency Law applicable and answer the question as follows on your exam answer sheet (see example below). (15) CONFIDENTIAL 9 of 11 MRL3701 May/June 2024 EXAMPLE: 1. Case name: Joint Liquidators of Glen Anil v Hill Samuel 1982 (1) SA 103 (A). 2. Ratio decidendi of the case: The bonds in favour of Hill Samual did confer a preferent status. 3. Area of Insolvency Law applicable: Special Mortgages. Case Name: (1/2) Ratio decidendi of the case: (1) Area of Insolvency Law applicable: (1/2) Magnum Financial Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Summerly & Another NNO 1984 (1) SA 160 W Section 21 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 authorises the Master that the trustee may attach the property of the Solvent Spouse. Disposition in the ordinary course of business. Hendriks NO v Swanepoel 1962 (4) SA 338 (A) With the disappearance of the companies substratum, if there is fraud committed, a deadlock in management, the dissolution of a partnership and oppression. Meaning of the word “debtor”. Harksen v Lane NO & Others 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) The question to be decided was whether the trust before the court was susceptible of sequestration. Property which falls in the insolvent estate. Vorster NO v Steyn 1981 (2) A 831 (O) An exception to section 29 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 is that a disposition is allowed if it is done in the ordinary course of business. When is it just an equitable for a company to be wound up by court. CONFIDENTIAL 10 of 11 MRL3701 May/June 2024 Rand Air (Pty) Ltd v Ray Bester Investments (Pty) Ltd 1985 (2) SA 345 (W) When someone applies for rehabilitation, a provision in the will of a deceased that the property bequeathed to the insolvent should go into trust if at the time the person is being rehabilitated, is nudum praeceptum. Vesting of the assets of the solvent spouse. 1.5 In terms of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, only married females and children born in wedlock will receive “immediate benefits” under a duly registered antenuptial contract. By referring to the relevant sections of legislation applicable, explain how this has the potential to violate the constitutional rights of individuals. In your answer you should include a discussion on Transformative Constitutionalism. (15) TOTAL QUESTION 1: [50] __________________________________________________________________________ Question 2 2.1 What is the legal effect of a contract when the insolvent enters into a contract which is prohibited? (5) 2.2 Explain whether an unrehabilitated insolvent may be appointed as a trustee of an insolvent’s estate. (5) 2.3 The Master may, under certain circumstances, refuse to appoint a trustee. Identify the instances when the Master may refuse to confirm the election of a trustee. (5) 2.4 In terms of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, the trustee may set aside dispositions if they are voidable. Provide a detailed discussion of a disposition in terms of section 31 of the Act. (10) TOTAL QUESTION 2: [25] __________________________________________________________________________ CONFIDENTIAL 11 of 11 MRL3701 May/June 2024 Question 3 3.1 Regarding the transfer of a business without prescribed notice, discuss section 34(1) of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936. (10) 3.2 The liquidator of a company may in certain circumstances be removed from office before he has completed his duties as a liquidator. Discuss the instances where these rules apply. (10) 3.3 In the case of Business Rescue Proceedings, what does the phrase ‘rescuing the company’ mean? (5) TOTAL QUESTION 3: [25] __________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL MARKS: [100]