100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Duty of care-Questions and Answers Graded A+

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
46
Grado
A+
Subido en
18-04-2024
Escrito en
2023/2024

Duty of care-Questions and Answers Graded A+ Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks CO (1856) - ANSWER-Alderson B said " Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would do or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do" Pre Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 - ANSWER-No recognised general test Early case Heaven v Pender 1883 - Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) - ANSWER-Neighbough principle Since she had not bought the beer she could not bring a claim for breach of warranty. She therefore brought an action against the manufacturer. HLS had to decide if there was a duty of care in law. HLS held - NARROW RULE that a manufacturer of goods owed a duty of care to their consumer. The case also established the NEIGHBOUR prinicple which determines whether the defendant owes a duty of care in any situation Lord Atkin said " You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who then in law is your neighbour? The answer seems to be persons so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in to question. " Neighbour prinicple - Lord Atkin - ANSWER-Lord Atkin said " You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who then in law is your neighbour? The answer seems to be persons so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in to question. " Lord MacMillan in Donoghue v Stevenson - ANSWER-'The categories of negligence are never closed' - courts can formulate new categories. Caparo Industries v Dickman 1990 - ANSWER-60 years later - neighbour principle is reformulated.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
DUTY OF CARE
Grado
DUTY OF CARE











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
DUTY OF CARE
Grado
DUTY OF CARE

Información del documento

Subido en
18 de abril de 2024
Número de páginas
46
Escrito en
2023/2024
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

$8.49
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
EricMatt

Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
EricMatt West Governors University
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
0
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
386
Última venta
-
Grade Master

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes