BUL 3310 Exam 3 Bailey (Questions + Answers) Verified 100% Correct!!
A master can normally avoid liability for damages caused by a servant if he can show that the servant misunderstood his instructions T or F? - Answer-True In contracts negotiated by an agent who is acting within the scope of his authority for a disclosed principal, the agent, the principal, and the third party are equally liable on the contract T or F? - Answer-False The legal doctrine that holds the master liable for the torts committed by a servant while acting within the scope of this employment is ___ - quid pro quo - respondeat superior - caveat emptor - alter ego liability - Answer-Respondeat Superior In which of the following situations would an employee avoid liability for torts committed while carrying out his employment obligations? - a corporate officer acting on behalf of the corporation - a servant following the instructions of his master - an agent carrying out the orders of his principal - none of the above; everyone has personal liability for the torts he commits - Answer-None of the above; everyone has personal liability for the torts he commits Which legal rule will not impose punitive damages on a master for the torts of his servants unless the master himself took some part in the wrongful action?- vicarious liability rule - durham rule - complicity rule - transferred liability rule - Answer-Complicity rule Which of the following is NOT a factor in determining whether a servant was acting within the scope of his employment? - was the servant carrying on the master's business when the tort was committed? - was the servant disobeying the instructions of the master when the tort was committed? - was the instrumentality of the injury furnished by the master? - did the master authorize the servant to use the instrumentality of the injury? - Answer-Was the servant disobeying the instructions of the master when the tort was committed? Normally a master is not liable for torts committed by a servant while traveling from his home to the workplace T or F? - Answer-True Whether or not a servant was acting in the scope of his employment when he injured a third party is a question of ___ to be decided by the ___ - fact, judge - law, judge - fact, jury - law, jury - Answer-Fact ; Jury
Escuela, estudio y materia
- Institución
- BUL 3310 Bailey
- Grado
- BUL 3310 Bailey
Información del documento
- Subido en
- 15 de abril de 2024
- Número de páginas
- 85
- Escrito en
- 2023/2024
- Tipo
- Examen
- Contiene
- Preguntas y respuestas
Temas
-
bul 3310 bailey
Documento también disponible en un lote