100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

PLS2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (730417)

Puntuación
-
Vendido
1
Páginas
15
Grado
A+
Subido en
25-03-2024
Escrito en
2023/2024

PLS2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (Unique Nr. 730417) ... 100 % TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on +/ 2/ 5/ 4 /7 /7 /9 /5 /4 /0 /1 /3 /2 . QUESTION 1: SHORT QUESTIONS: Instructions for Question 1: Write short answers for each question. The number alongside each question is the total mark for the question. 1.1 What is the difference between dogma and a critically reasoned argument? [write 3-4 sentences] (4 marks) 1.2 What is an implicit conclusion in an argument? [write 2-3 sentences] (2 marks) 1.3 What is the difference between a premise indicator and a conclusion indicator of an argument? Give an example of an argument in which you can show where these indicators are. [write 3-4 sentences] (4 marks) 1.4 State the kind of writing found in each of the following statements: 1.4.1 For Kwasi Wiredu, the basic characteristic of folk philosophy is that it contains bald, non-discursive assertions which are not supported by argument. (2 marks) 1.4.2 As for Thabo, after passing matric in 1975 he got a job as an unqualified teacher at Thoko-Thaba secondary school, then got married in his second year of teaching. After a year or two he obtained a mortgaged house through United bank in Thokoza Gardens. (2 marks) 1.4.3 The term ‘oral’ refers to spoken words, to verbal expressions of thoughts in different ways and styles. (2 marks) Downloaded by Thomas Mboya () lOMoARcPSD| 3 1.5 What kind of definitions are in each of the following statements? 1.5.1 ‘Tigon’ is taken to mean the offspring of a male tiger and a female lion. (2 marks) 1.5.2 ‘Psychiatry’ means the fortuitous melding of modern medicine with psychology that promises relief to thousands of poor, desperate souls who suffer the pains of emotional disorder. (2 marks) 1.5.3 ‘Intractable’ means not easily governed; obstinate; unruly; not disposed to be taught. (2 marks) 1.6 State whether the following pieces of writings are mere sentences or propositions (statements) in logical terms. 1.6.1 The Netherlands is smaller than Belgium as far as population is concerned. (2 marks) 1.6.2 Every triangle has three sides and three angles. (2 marks) 1.6.3 ‘Better be safe than sorry’ (2 marks) 1.6.4 ‘Mary, please come here! (2 marks) 1.6.5 Aristotle was educated in Africa. (2 marks) 1.7 Give the Name of the formal or informal fallacy found in each of the following arguments: 1.7.1 If students study hard, then they will pass their exams. Apparently, students did not study hard. Therefore, we can conclude that they will not pass their exams.(1 mark) 1.7.2 The Law ought to be hard on men who abuse women for the reason that these men are women abusers. (1 mark) 1.7.3 When I was touring South Africa, I met three white people on different occasions who displayed some racist attitude to people of African descent. It seems to me that all white people in South Africa are racist. (1 mark) 1.7.4 “Did you see how the EFF political party members conducted themselves in parliament lately? They were screaming and shouting and climbing on top of the tables. This is disgusting, and it does not matter what points they were raising. As civilized people we cannot allow ourselves to be ruled by barbaric people. Clearly, we should not vote for the EFF in 2024 general elections.” (1 mark) [36] Downloaded by Thomas Mboya () lOMoARcPSD| 4 QUESTION 2: ARGUMENT EVALUATION: Instructions for Question 2: 1. Evaluate the following three arguments. 2. In your evaluation, state whether the argument is inductive or deductive, value or empirical, contains a fallacy or not (stipulate which fallacy if it contains one) and whether it is valid/invalid or sound/unsound or strong/weak. 3. Present your responses on how you have evaluated the three arguments in the form of a table. The table is provided below after the three arguments: Argument 2.1 It is not wrong to kill spiders (not A). But if spiders have eternal souls (B), then it is wrong to kill them (A). Thus, it is false that spiders have eternal souls (not B). Argument 2.2 The work of a garbage collector is of great importance (1). The pay is good and the hours are reasonable (2). So, your reluctance to take this job is beyond comprehension (3). Argument 2.3 All black people are African people (a), and all Zulu speaking people are black people (b). Hence, all Zulu speaking people are African people (c). Table in which to provide your answers is here below. But you can also draw your own table. [marks 1x12=12] Inductive or Deductive Value or empirical Fallacy? If ‘Yes,’ which? Valid / invalid or sound / unsound Argument 2.1 Argument 2.2 Argument 2.3 Downloaded by Thomas Mboya () lOMoARcPSD| 5 QUESTION 3: ARGUMENT MAPS/DIAGRAMS: Instructions for Question 3: Create argument maps/argument diagrams of the following arguments. Example: Human beings are buried respectfully after they have died (a). When they are sick, we do everything to save their lives (b). Therefore, human beings are dignified creatures (c). Argument map/diagram a b c Be sure that you number the statements as they are labelled in the questions. 3.1 Lying causes social discord (A). Hence lying is wrong (B). (3 marks) 3.2 It is foolish to live in a modern city (1), because in the modern city the pace of life is inhuman (2); the crime rate is high (3); the air quality is often poor (4); and the traffic is dangerous (5). (5 marks) 3.3 If alcoholism is a disease, then it is treated medically (a). But alcoholism is not treated medically (b). So, alcoholism is not a disease (c). (4 marks) [12] [60 MARKS]

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
25 de marzo de 2024
Número de páginas
15
Escrito en
2023/2024
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

PLS2601
ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 2024

, lOMoARcPSD|21997160




CRITICAL REASONING
PLS2601


* SEMESTER 1 *



Assignment 2



Instructions:


1. This assignment consists of short questions.
2. Be guided by the allotted marks as to the length of each answer.
3. The questions are based on Lessons 4, 5 and 6.
4. Please submit this assignment as a file.
5. When you utilise other sources in order to complete your assignment, please provide appropriate
intext and bibliographical information following the prescribed format given in Tutorial Letter 301.
6. Please include a plagiarism declaration with your assignment.
7. The unique number for this assignment is 730417.



Additional student instructions

1. NO emailed assignment scripts will be accepted.
2. Students are advised to preview submissions (answer scripts) to ensure legibility and that the correct
answer script file has been uploaded.

3. Students are permitted to resubmit their answer scripts should their initial submission be unsatisfactory,
provided the submission is within the allowable time (not later than the submission date).
4. Incorrect file format and uncollated answer scripts will not be considered.
5. Incorrect answer scripts and/or submissions made on unofficial platforms will not be marked and no
opportunity will be granted for resubmission.
6. A mark awarded for incomplete submission will be the student’s final mark. No opportunity for
resubmission will be granted.
7. A mark awarded for illegible scanned submission will be the student’s final mark. No opportunity for
resubmission will be granted.
8. Submissions will only be accepted from registered student accounts.

9. Students must complete the declaration of own work when submitting. Students suspected of plagiarism
will be subjected to disciplinary processes. Plagiarism is a violation of academic integrity, and students
who do plagiarise or copy verbatim from published work will be in violation of the Policy on Academic
Integrity and the Student Disciplinary Code and may be referred to disciplinary hearing. Unisa has a zero
tolerance for plagiarism and/or any other forms of academic dishonesty.


1
$2.71
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
LIBRARYpro University of South Africa (Unisa)
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
10518
Miembro desde
2 año
Número de seguidores
4904
Documentos
4814
Última venta
1 semana hace
LIBRARY

On this page, you find all documents, Package Deals, and Flashcards offered by seller LIBRARYpro (LIBRARY). Knowledge is Power. #You already got my attention!

3.7

1457 reseñas

5
683
4
235
3
243
2
78
1
218

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes