100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

European law, summary (midterm 2), TLS

Puntuación
3.9
(15)
Vendido
57
Páginas
46
Subido en
14-05-2018
Escrito en
2017/2018

A summary of the book 'An introduction to European Law' (2nd edition) by Robert Schütze. Chapters which are summarized: Week 1: Chapters 1, 5 and 6 Week 2: Chapters 9 and 11 Week 3: Chapters 2, 3 and 10 Week 4: Chapters 4, 7 and 8

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

¿Un libro?
Desconocido
Subido en
14 de mayo de 2018
Archivo actualizado en
31 de mayo de 2018
Número de páginas
46
Escrito en
2017/2018
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

European law, summary (week 1-4)

Week 1: Chapters 1, 5 and 6
Chapter 1: Creation: Union Institutions
Introduction
 Each politcal community needs insttutons to govern its society; each society needs
common rules and a method for their making, executon and adjudicatonn
 The European Treates establish a number of European insttutons to make, execute, and
adjudicate European lawn
 Artn 13 TEU:
o European Parliament
o European Council
o The Council They are not the same!
o The European Commission (the Commission)
o The Court of Justce of the European Union
o The European Central Bank
o The Court of Auditors

1.The European Parliament (EP)
Not the ‘frstt’ insttutonn Used to be an ‘auxiliaryt’ organ that assisted the insttutonal duopoly of the
Council and Commissionn
Today:
 Together with Council: a chamber of the Union legislature
 Directly elected by European citiens
 Supranatonal

Electing Parliament
Originally the Parliamentarians consisted of delegates from the parliaments of Member States (MS)n
Brought Parliament close to an (internatonal) ‘assemblyt’n
The founding Treates had breached the classis IL logic in 2 ways:
 They had abandoned the idea of sovereign equality of the Member States
 by recogniiing diferent siies for natonal parliamentary delegatons
 Treates already envisaged that Parliament would eventually be formed through ‘electons by
direct universal sufrage in accordance with a uniform procedure of all Member Statest’

From an ‘assemblyt’ of natonal parliamentarians into a directly elected Parliament:
 This was since the adopton of the Uniont’s 1976 ‘Electon Actt’
 And since the frst parliamentary electons in 1979, the European Parliament ceased to be
composed of ‘representatves of the peoples of Statest’  it consttuted the representatve of
a European Unionn
However, now the European Parliament is said to be composed of the representatves of the Uniont’s
citienn

The European Parliament has a maximum siie of 751 membersn
European Council decides on the natonal ‘quotast’ for the Uniont’s parliamentary representatvesn
 Distributon of seats is degressively proportional
 National quota makes a compromise between the democratc principle and the federal
principle

, o Democratc: each citien in Union has equal votng power
o Federal: insists on the politcal existence of States
 Result of compromise was the rejecton of a purely proportonal distributon in favor of a
degressively proportonal system
 Which means that not every citien has the same votng power!
 Degressive element means that a Luxembourg citien has 10x more votng power than a
German citien
 Members are elected for 5 years
 The specifes of the electon procedure are lef to the Member States, but should be in
accordance with principles common to all MSt’s
 Citiens of the EU residing in another MS, have the same rights as natonals of that State
 Electons on the basis of proportonal representaton, they do not follow a uniform electoral
procedure in all Member States
o But Treates insist on one common rule constitutional rule: all members shall
have the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in electons

Parliamentary powers
 At frst, the Parliament was only given supervisory powers, as a passive onlooker on the
decision-making process, later it became advisoryn
 Later the Parliament ‘advisory and supervisory powerst’  active power
o Parliament had to be consulted on Commission proposals before their adopton
by the Council
 Now 4 types of powers:
in Legislatve powers
o Propose new legislaton (making the formal bill is done by the Commission)
o The legislatve involvement of Parliament starts afer the Commission has
submitted a proposal to the European legislature
o Treates now distnguish between ‘ordinaryt’ legislatve procedure and ‘specialt’
legislatve procedure
 Ordinary: the joint adopton by the EP and the Council
 Special: cover various degrees of parliamentary partcipaton
 Consent procedure: Parliament must give its consent before the
Council can adopt European legislaton, but they cannot amend
which leads to a take-or-leave positon
 Consultation procedure: Parliament is not enttled to give its
consent, it only needs to be consulted
iin Budgetary powers
o Not focused on the income side, but on the expenditure side
o EPt’s involvement in the Union budget started with the 1970 and 1975 Budget
Treates
o Budget Treates distnguish:
 Compulsory expenditure: fnancial commitments from the applicaton of
EU law
 Non-compulsory expenditure: expenditure that would not result from
compulsory fnancial commitments fowing from the applicaton of EU
law
 Later this distncton was abandoned and Parliament became
equal with the Council in establishing the budget
iiin Supervisory powers
o The power to debate, queston and investgate
$4.50
Accede al documento completo:
Comprado por 57 estudiantes

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada


Documento también disponible en un lote

Reseñas de compradores verificados

Se muestran 7 de 15 comentarios
4 año hace

6 año hace

6 año hace

6 año hace

6 año hace

6 año hace

6 año hace

3.9

15 reseñas

5
3
4
8
3
4
2
0
1
0
Reseñas confiables sobre Stuvia

Todas las reseñas las realizan usuarios reales de Stuvia después de compras verificadas.

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Jamy13a Tilburg University
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
1037
Miembro desde
8 año
Número de seguidores
491
Documentos
25
Última venta
3 meses hace

4.3

206 reseñas

5
98
4
72
3
31
2
1
1
4

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes