100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Ultimate Mock Exam 2.1C (Cognitive PSychology (Thinking and Remembering) with Elaborate answers

Puntuación
5.0
(1)
Vendido
17
Páginas
14
Grado
A+
Subido en
31-10-2023
Escrito en
2023/2024

This exam was made based on the most important aspects of every topic, and covers all parts of the problem ( from A to C). It has very elaborate answers that can serve as a quick and efficient summary before the exam.

Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
31 de octubre de 2023
Número de páginas
14
Escrito en
2023/2024
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Mock Exam: Thinking and Remembering (Cognitive
Psychology)


1. The difference between inattentional blindness and change blindness is:


a) Inattentional blindness happens when we fail to see objects even though we
know that they should appear, while change blindness is when the stimulus
changes when you look the other way and when you look back you don’t
notice the change.


b) These terms are used interchangeably since they both represent the
phenomenon when people don’t notice things that change in their eyes.


c) Inattentional blindness is about the failure to notice unexpected objects/
events when the attention is focused elsewhere, while change blindness is
when the stimulus starts changing in your eyes but you don’t see it.


Example of the answer with explanation: C: Concepts are related but don’t mean the same.
As an example Inattentional Blindness happened when participants could not notice the
gorilla coming to the basketball field because they were focused on counting the players (the
task of the experiment), for change blindness - they did not notice the curtains closing while
looking at the scene.


2. What were the findings of the experiment using a dichotic listening task?


a) Participants had to listen through headphones when 2 different audio streams were
playing in each ear, they were asked to focus on both of them and recall later what
they heard, the result - they heard one better than the other, and only heard the
second when the language was switched.

, b) Dichotic listening task: A task in which different audio streams are presented to each
ear. Typically people are asked to listen to one ear and then tested if they heard
anything on another ear. Result: participants did not notice what the speaker in the
ear they didn’t focus on said. Not even if they switch their language.
c) 35% of the participants were able to hear both streams equally while the rest only
could recall the stream they focused on.


3. Which of the theories of selective attention is described here: “The model involves later
filtering mechanism: Instead of blocking stimuli out, the filter merely weakens the strength
of stimuli other than the target stimulus. So when the stimuli reach us, we analyze them at a
low level for target properties like loudness and pitch.”


a) Broadbent model
b) Treisman Attenuation model
c) Selective filter model by Moray


4. In the experiment on attentional blink, participants where asked to recall two
numbers in a sequence of letters (T1 and T2). Researchers wanted to find out under
which conditions participants recall the T2 better. Under which condition was T2
recalled the best?


a) Under Standard Group conditions: participants were asked to focus and try to
remember the numbers.
b) Under listening to music condition while they were doing the task.
c) Under reward condition: when they were paid based on their performance


5. What is ‘retroactive interference’?
a) When we have trouble learning new information based on before stored
information. This is caused by the primacy effect.
b) When the later items will interfere with your ability to properly process the first few
items. It is caused by the recency effect
$5.79
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada


Documento también disponible en un lote

Reseñas de compradores verificados

Se muestran los comentarios
1 año hace

5.0

1 reseñas

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Reseñas confiables sobre Stuvia

Todas las reseñas las realizan usuarios reales de Stuvia después de compras verificadas.

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
BookWormmm Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
284
Miembro desde
2 año
Número de seguidores
85
Documentos
14
Última venta
1 mes hace

3.5

33 reseñas

5
6
4
14
3
7
2
3
1
3

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes