Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2021/2022.
PVL3702
Law of Contract
ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO
SEMESTER 2 – 2023
UNIQUE NUMBER: - 698664
DUE DATE: - 21st AUGUST 2023
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography*
QUESTIONS
Carol, an owner of an exclusive bicycle shop advertised a special limited-edition bicycle
for sale, and invited the public to make offers for the bicycle. Jane and Portia were among
many people who submitted written offers for the bicycle. Jane’s offer was for R150 000,
and Portia’s offer was for R190 000. Although Carol intended to accept Portia’s offer, she
erroneously wrote a letter to Jane, wherein she accepted Jane’s offer. Jane believes that
an enforceable contract was concluded but Carol denies this. Apply the iustus error
doctrine and advise if a legally binding contract was concluded between Carol and Jane.
Discuss fully and refer to case law in your answer. Do not apply the Consumer Protection
Act 68 of 2008.
[20]
QUESTION/ ANSWERS CONTINUE….
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
SELLING” memos for the year 2021/2022.
PVL3702
Law of Contract
ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO
SEMESTER 2 – 2023
UNIQUE NUMBER: - 698664
DUE DATE: - 21st AUGUST 2023
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography*
QUESTIONS
Carol, an owner of an exclusive bicycle shop advertised a special limited-edition bicycle
for sale, and invited the public to make offers for the bicycle. Jane and Portia were among
many people who submitted written offers for the bicycle. Jane’s offer was for R150 000,
and Portia’s offer was for R190 000. Although Carol intended to accept Portia’s offer, she
erroneously wrote a letter to Jane, wherein she accepted Jane’s offer. Jane believes that
an enforceable contract was concluded but Carol denies this. Apply the iustus error
doctrine and advise if a legally binding contract was concluded between Carol and Jane.
Discuss fully and refer to case law in your answer. Do not apply the Consumer Protection
Act 68 of 2008.
[20]
QUESTION/ ANSWERS CONTINUE….
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 074 074 3729 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
