Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary Personal Advisors

Puntuación
5.0
(1)
Vendido
-
Páginas
2
Subido en
15-04-2017
Escrito en
2014/2015

Summary of 2 pages for the course Politics at QUB (Personal Advisors)

Institución
Grado

Vista previa del contenido

Compare + Contrast how personal advisors have increased the power of UK PM + US President.


Para Key Points Key Points
1  Despite continuing importance of cabinet (UK), role played by  Especially, if one key players is appointed personal adviser
personal advisors influencing PM decision making grown from PMO not an elected minister.
significantly.  Many say PM has their own department, in PMO = de facto
 All PM's -surround with collection close friends + advisors - but not formalised PM department.
trusted, even if choices lack formal position of power.  Large number of advisers brought in at any moments - keep
 This kind of loose + informal 'kitchen cabinet' = resentments PM informed on policy developments + potential difficulties.
among others in party.
2  Emphasis on presentation. Increased role Press Office indicates  Give advice + played key role for Blair.
importance.  Policy Unit - no more than 8 appointees before Blair, he
 Four main sections PMO = Private Office, Political Office, Policy considerably strengthened his unit.
Unit + Press Office.  2001 - 13 members + well placed to convey his views to
 Private Office manages PM's engagement + relations - departments.
Parliament + Whitehall.  Peter Hennessey - help 'justified impression of No.10
 Political Office - links PM with between Parliament + Party, becoming more like the White House'.
advises them on political tactics, preparing speeches +  Press Office handles relations with TV, radio + press.
important documents.  Press secretaries - Bernard Ingham - Thatcher + Blair =
 Policy Unit - made up of advisors drawn from outside Alistair Campbell - most influential.
government + few career officials.
3  Cabinet not mentioned -US Constitution, although all Presidents  Blair - cabinet to impose his will, not always staying once his
have one. views were made.
 Cabinet - lower status than Britain + influence on decline since  Meetings = brief + less collegiate.
1930's (EXOP) created similar time (1939).  Number of personal advisers in PMO doubled under Blair
 PM rely Cabinet greater or lesser extent. compared to Major.
 John Major - extensive use of Cabinet than predecessor + less  He departed from Major's collegiate style more a more
use of cabinet committees + bilaterals. 'Presidential' style of leadership.
4  Britain, Cabinet - main decision making body.  May choose to consult but does not feel bound to.
 Co-ordinates policy + court of appeal when agreement cannot  View members as spokespersons for departments.
be reached.  Presidents - no particular reasons why Cabinet members
 PM very powerful, role of Cabinet - still major, commentator’s interested in/agreed upon all aspects.
debate balance of power between premier + colleagues.  John F.Kennedy 'Why should the postmaster sit there + listen
 PM needs cabinet backing. American cabinet - advisory body to a discussion of the problems of Laos?'
only + final analysis President - may choose to ignore it.  American cabinet - contributes less. Walles' "no party
 Lincoln asked cabinet to vote - unanimity in opposition he pressures to induce a sense of collectively... no electoral
announced his decision "7 nays + 1 aye, the ayes have it". demands impose an outward unity"
 Major decisions remain in his hands, - enhance power in  Presidents - disillusioned with creation, Carter favoured
relation to PM but leaves him exposed. strong Cabinet + meet frequently in first two years.
 Role can be lonely, cannot count on party support.  By 1979 inviting all Cabinet Secretaries to resign in economic
 President looks elsewhere - policy advice, coordination + crisis.
support + turn to White House Office Staff.  No question of him + his team sinking or swimming together.
5  British system demand more collegiality. Increasing use cabinet  Major + controversial issues - require backing of at least
committees, bi-laterals + sofa style - personal advisors same heavyweights, fool to pursue policy lacking support of
influence as ministers. Cabinet.
 Function - decision making body frequently bypassed, more  Presidential system - single chief executive, departmental
ratifying + legitimising decisions made elsewhere. heads follow own agenda + cabinet meetings described by
 PM's increasing use personal advisors - alternative source of Hague 'little more than a presidential photo-opportunity'.
consul.
6  Presidents do not have degree of backing + support from  President relies Executive Office - background info, detailed
Cabinet the PM, is accustomed to receiving. analysis + informed policy recommendations.
 Have other sources of help - E.X.O.P. e.g. White House Staff -  Takes place - heart of admin. giving advice he depends on,
personal appointees of President - relies upon for general conducting many dealings with Congress, publicise, supervise
strategy + advice. + implementation of decisions.
 Members of inner clique - deny access to President + Cabinet.  Freed to deal with top level matters + future planning.
Con.  Despite gradual demise influence, UK still more significant than  Existence of unelected, unaccountable, spin doctors in Blair’s
US counterpart. gov. – called into question culture of ‘sofa-style’ government
 Cabinet ministers UK more powerful in comparison to EOP blamed for scandals – ‘dodgy dossier’ on WMD’s sell Iraq War
advisors only compete with insignificant cabinet officers. to Parliament.
 EOP PA + cabinet officers – unelected, thus no moral obligation  PA = increased power offering leaders support perform
for President – limit power + influence to ensure cabinet team increasingly demanding range of roles.
doesn’t get side-lined.  Heavy criticism being too close + not telling inconvenient
 Tony Blair’s Press Secretary Campbell became more powerful, truths = ill-advised policies.
pressure on PM from media to get rid of him. He ended up  Effect of personal advisors greater increasing power of
resigning. President – singular executive lends itself to this style.
 UK tempered – culture + history of cabinet – mistrust of
faceless, shadowy figures that can’t be removed.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
15 de abril de 2017
Número de páginas
2
Escrito en
2014/2015
Tipo
RESUMEN

Temas

$4.75
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Reseñas de compradores verificados

Se muestran los comentarios
7 año hace

5.0

1 reseñas

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Reseñas confiables sobre Stuvia

Todas las reseñas las realizan usuarios reales de Stuvia después de compras verificadas.

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
MarkC57 Queens University Belfast
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
66
Miembro desde
9 año
Número de seguidores
49
Documentos
231
Última venta
6 meses hace

Currently studying Law at university, I wish to provide my notes that I have created during my A-Level studies: Geography, Business Studies, Government and Politics and notes from my Law Degree. OPEN TO NEGOTIATION ON PRICE, SEND A MESSAGE.

4.3

102 reseñas

5
62
4
16
3
22
2
1
1
1

Documentos populares

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes