100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada
logo-home
ESSAY: How Successfully did the UK Respond to Global Crises ? $5.48   Añadir al carrito

Ensayo

ESSAY: How Successfully did the UK Respond to Global Crises ?

 24 vistas  0 compra
  • Grado
  • Institución

Foreign policy essay covering Korea, Suez and the Falklands War. Featuring A/A* band evaluation, facts and discussion of how each of these crises affected the British publics view of the nations position in the world as well as their 'special relationship' with America. DO NOT PLAGIARISE!!! To be ...

[Mostrar más]

Vista previa 1 fuera de 2  páginas

  • 22 de junio de 2023
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Ensayo
  • Desconocido
  • A+
avatar-seller
How Successfully did the UK Respond to Global Crises 1951-97
The UK was involved in three major international crises in this period: the Korean War, the
Suez Crisis and the Falklands War. Although other crises occurred, such as the Vietnam War,
Britain steered clear of these which in the case of Vietnam, ultimately prevented them from
failure and therefore was a successful decision. On a wider scale, British handling of
international crises was generally successful, despite the Suez crisis of 1956 being a complete
failure.

Britain’s response to the Korean War was generally a success. UK forces joined the UN
forces following North Korea’s invasion of the South in June 1950 in order to challenge
communist aggression. Although this was a contributing factor to 10% of British GDP being
spent on military and defence, a percentage that Britain could not truly afford in years of
post-war austerity, the war was the first major challenge to the credibility of the UN of which
Britain was a founding member and arguably allowed Britain to maintain the façade of being
a great power despite being severely economically weakened by WW2. In addition,
involvement in the war was a success as it showed a commitment to the so-called “special
relationship” with America, even if US troops dwarfed Britain’s and the important decision to
push North in September 1950 was largely influenced by American military leadership. This
commitment to American interests on the part of Britain ensured US commitment in return to
the defence of Britain and support for NATO, which was crucial for the protection of British
interests. This meant that involvement in the Korean War was ultimately a success, as it
ensured British safety, defended South Korea, and reinforced American ties to Europe, the
latter of which allowed Britain to decrease military spending in later years.

In contrast, the Suez Crisis of 1956 was undoubtedly a failure. The Suez Canal was a vital sea
route for oil, and since 1875 Britain had been a majority shareholder in running it. In mid-
July 1956, following US and British withdrawal of a loan due to an unwillingness to adopt
pro-Western policies, Nasser took control of the Anglo-French company that ran the canal.
Prime Minister Anthony Eden responded to this by attacking Egypt in late October 1956 with
France. The invasion itself was a failure, and the dire consequences of Eden’s decision were
enforced by Eisenhower’s anger and a potential end to the “special relationship”, as America
had wanted the crisis to be resolved peacefully. Eden’s decision was especially harmful given
the wider context of the USSR’s invasion of Hungary to crush efforts of anti-communist
reform there, making it difficult for the USA to condemn the USSR, especially as Nasser’s
actions were not illegal and the USSR was able to condemn it as imperialist. Suez further
signalled the end of Britain’s legacy as a great imperialist power, giving the public a “wake
up call” that the country no longer wielded the influence on a global stage that it had before
the war. This made the invasion, to a great extent, a failure.

Arguably even more successful than British involvement in the Korean War was the 1982
Falklands Crisis. Although it did not necessarily elevate Britain on the international stage, it
was hugely supported in Britain and transformed Margaret Thatcher’s personal political
fortunes leading to her landslide 1983 election victory. The response to Argentina’s invasion

Los beneficios de comprar resúmenes en Stuvia estan en línea:

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Garantiza la calidad de los comentarios

Compradores de Stuvia evaluaron más de 700.000 resúmenes. Así estas seguro que compras los mejores documentos!

Compra fácil y rápido

Compra fácil y rápido

Puedes pagar rápidamente y en una vez con iDeal, tarjeta de crédito o con tu crédito de Stuvia. Sin tener que hacerte miembro.

Enfócate en lo más importante

Enfócate en lo más importante

Tus compañeros escriben los resúmenes. Por eso tienes la seguridad que tienes un resumen actual y confiable. Así llegas a la conclusión rapidamente!

Preguntas frecuentes

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

100% de satisfacción garantizada: ¿Cómo funciona?

Nuestra garantía de satisfacción le asegura que siempre encontrará un documento de estudio a tu medida. Tu rellenas un formulario y nuestro equipo de atención al cliente se encarga del resto.

Who am I buying this summary from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller georginaparbrook. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy this summary for $5.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

45,681 summaries were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy summaries for 14 years now

Empieza a vender
$5.48
  • (0)
  Añadir