100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary EDEXCEL US Supreme Court cases Warren, Burger, Rehnquist and Roberts court

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
17
Subido en
22-06-2023
Escrito en
2022/2023

Very in depth cases Supreme Court Decisions, court, aftermath etc

Institución
Grado








Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Nivel de Estudio
Editores
Tema
Curso

Información del documento

¿Un libro?
Subido en
22 de junio de 2023
Número de páginas
17
Escrito en
2022/2023
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

The Warren Court 1953-1969 ( Race, Rights and Religion )
- Series of civil rights cases delivering liberal opinions.
- Judicial activism is associated with the Warren Court.
- Court which gave a series of rulings that promoted civil rights typically at the expense of state law.
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 1954 Engel v Vitale , 1962 Miranda v Arizona, 1966
- Known as landmark liberal rulings - Known as landmark li
- The justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation - Presented the question of whether a public school - Ernesto Miranda was
of children in public schools was unconstitutional. could sanction classroom prayers at a time when house and brought to
- Helped establish the precedent that ‘separate but America was increasingly pluralistic and secular where he was questio
equal’ education was in fact not equal at all - widely viewed as one of the most unpopular decisions officers in connection
- Was a major victory of the civil rights movement in Supreme Court history. and rape
- Case began in 1951 when Public school system in - Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state officials - Police obtained a writ
Topeka, Kansas, refused to enroll local black resident to compose an official school prayer and encourage from Miranda. The wr
at the elementary school closest to their home, its recitation in public schools, due to violation of the was admitted into evi
instead requiring her to ride a bus to a segregated First Amendment. despite the objection
black school farther away. - case was brought by a group of families of public attorney
- The Browns and twelve other local black families in school students led by Steven Engel, in New Hyde - The jury found Miran
similar situations filed a class-action lawsuit in U.S. Park from the Herricks Union Free School District who appeal, the Supreme
federal court against the Topeka Board of Education, sued the school board president William Vitale. affirmed and held tha
alleging that its segregation policy was - The families argued that the voluntary prayer written constitutional rights w
unconstitutional by the state board of regents to "Almighty God" because he did not sp
- Case was named after a lawsuit filed in 1951 by contradicted their religious beliefs counsel.
NAACP lawyers against the Topeka, Kansas school - The plaintiffs argued that opening the school day with - 5-4 decision, majority
district on behalf of Linda Brown and her family. such a prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the Warren
- A special three-judge court of the U.S. District Court First Amendment to the United States Constitution (as - Chief Justice Earl War
for the District of Kansas rendered a verdict against applied to the states through the Fourteenth opinion of the 5-4 ma
the Browns, relying on the precedent of Plessy v. Amendment), which states, in part, "Congress shall that defendant’s inter
Ferguson and its "separate but equal" doctrine. make no law respecting an establishment of religion the Fifth Amendment
- 1954, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9–0 - 6-1 decision , court ruled in favour of Engel, the - Chief Justice Earl War
decision in favor of the Browns. The Court ruled that Supreme Court held that reciting government-written decision, ruling Miran
"separate educational facilities are inherently prayers in public schools was unconstitutional, illegitimate and holdin
unequal", and therefore laws that impose them
$28.25
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
denitsaivanova

Documento también disponible en un lote

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
denitsaivanova
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
3
Miembro desde
2 año
Número de seguidores
2
Documentos
33
Última venta
1 año hace
A Level Notes for OCR Sociology, AQA English and Edexcel Politics

A Level notes in the form of knowledge organisers and essays for OCR Sociology, AQA English Lit, Edexcel Politics for which I received BAA

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes