pyc3701_
summary
,2: SOCIAL COGNITION: HOW WE
THINK ABOUT THE WORLD
SU 2.1. SCHEMA S: ME NTA L FRAME WORKS FOR
ORGA NISING – A ND USING – SOCIAL INFORMAT ION
Schemas: Mental frameworks centering on a specific theme that help us to organize
social information.
THE IMPACT O F SCHEMA S O N SOCIAL COGNITION:
ATTE NTION, E NCODING, RET RIEVA L
Schemas influence attention (the information we notice, for which schemas act as filters),
encoding (the process by which information gets stored in memory), and retrieval.
Information inconsistent with schemas is more likely to be noticed and to enter our
consciousness.
We rely most on schemas when we are experiencing cognitive load (a lot of information
at once).
Information that is consistent with our schemas is encoded. Information that is sharply
inconsistent with our schemas may be encoded into a separate memory location and
marked with a unique “tag”.
Regarding memory: In general, people report remembering more information consistent
with their schemas, but information inconsistent with their schemas may be strongly
present in memory too.
PRIMING: WHICH SCHEMA S GU IDE OU R T HOUG HT?
Priming: a situation that occurs when stimuli or events increase the availability in
memory or consciousness of specific types of information held in memory. Schemas can
be temporarily activated by priming.
Unpriming: Refers to the fact that the effects of the schemas tend to persist until they
are somehow expressed in thought or behaviour and only then do their effects decrease.
If primed schemas are not expressed, their effects may persist for long periods of time.
The stronger and better-developed our schemas are, the more likely they are to influence
our thinking, and especially our memory for social information.
SCHEMA PERSISTE NCE: WHY EVE N DISCREDITE D SCHEMA S
CAN SOMET IME S INFLUE NCE OU R T HOUG HT BEHAV IOUR
, Perseverance effect: The tendency for beliefs and schemas to remain unchanged even
in the face of contradictory information.
Evidence suggests that schemas can be self-fulfilling – they both shape and reflect the
social world.
Schemas help us make sense of the social world and process information efficiently, but
they can also lock us into acting in ways that create the world we expect.
REA SONING BY META PHOR: HOW SOCIAL ATT ITUDES A ND
BEHAV IOUR A RE A FF ECTE D BY FIGURES O F SPEE CH
Metaphor: A linguistic device that relates or draws a comparison between one abstract
thought and another dissimilar concept.
Because metaphors can activate different kinds of social knowledge, they can influence
how we interpret events.
SU 2.2. HEURISTICS: HOW WE REDUCE O UR E FF ORT IN
SOCIAL COGNITION
Social cognition: The manner in which we interpret, analyse, remember, and use
information about the social world.
Heuristics: Simple rules for making complex decisions or drawing inferences in a rapid
and seemingly effortless manner.
Affect: our current feelings and moods.
When we are subjected to more information than what we are capable of processing at
one time, this results in information overload.
Processing capacity can be diminished by stress levels.
We rely on heuristics because they allow us to do more, with less effort.
REPRESENTAT IVE NESS : JUDGING BY RESEMBLANCE
Prototype: Summary of the common attributes possessed by members of a category.
Representativeness heuristic: A strategy for making judgements based on the extent to
which current stimuli or events resemble other stimuli or categories.
Decisions based on the representative heuristic can be wrong, because they tend to
ignore base rates.
Base rates: the frequency with which given events or patterns occur in the total
population.
Cultural groups differ in the extent to which they rely on the representative heuristic and
expect “like to go with like” in terms of causes and effects.
Compared to North Americans, Asians rely less on the representative heuristic.
, AVA ILABILITY: “IF I CAN RET RIEVE INSTA NCES, T HEY MU ST
BE FREQUE NT”
Availability heuristic: A strategy for making judgments on the basis of how easily
specific kinds of information can be brought to mind.
Use of availability heuristic can cause us to overestimate the likelihood of events that are
dramatic but rare because they are easy to bring to mind.
When using the availability heuristic, the amount of information we can recall is also
influential.
If the judgement involves emotions or feelings, we tend to rely on the “ease” rule,
whereas if the judgement involves facts or if the task is inherently difficult, we tend to
rely more on the “amount” rule.
ANCHORING A ND A DJUSTME NT: WHERE YOU BEGIN MA KES
A DIFF ERENCE
Anchoring and adjustment heuristic: A heuristic that involves the tendency to use a
number, value, or personal experience as a starting point to which we then make
adjustments. An example is when a seller sets the price higher than he expects to get, and
a buyer bids lower than he is willing to pay.
We have a tendency to let initial anchors influence our judgements.
Although we make adjustments to anchors, these adjustments are often not sufficient to
overcome the initial impact of the anchors.
The tendency to make insufficient judgements is greater when people are in a state in
which they are less capable of engaging in effortful thought.
STATU S QUO HEURISTIC: “WHAT IS, IS GOO D”
When people are asked to make judgements and choices, they seem to act as though they
believe the status quo is good. For example, the brand that has been on the market
longer is better than the newer brand.
SU 2.3. A UTOMAT IC A ND CONTROLL ED PROCESS ING:
TWO BASIC MO DES O F T HOUGHT
Social thought can occur in either of two different ways: in a systematic, logical, and
highly effortful manner (controlled processing), or in a fast, relatively effortless, and
intuitive manner (automatic processing). Both may occur together.
Research suggests that people have two different neural systems for processing social
information – one that operates in an automatic manner, and one that operates in a
systematic and controlled manner.
summary
,2: SOCIAL COGNITION: HOW WE
THINK ABOUT THE WORLD
SU 2.1. SCHEMA S: ME NTA L FRAME WORKS FOR
ORGA NISING – A ND USING – SOCIAL INFORMAT ION
Schemas: Mental frameworks centering on a specific theme that help us to organize
social information.
THE IMPACT O F SCHEMA S O N SOCIAL COGNITION:
ATTE NTION, E NCODING, RET RIEVA L
Schemas influence attention (the information we notice, for which schemas act as filters),
encoding (the process by which information gets stored in memory), and retrieval.
Information inconsistent with schemas is more likely to be noticed and to enter our
consciousness.
We rely most on schemas when we are experiencing cognitive load (a lot of information
at once).
Information that is consistent with our schemas is encoded. Information that is sharply
inconsistent with our schemas may be encoded into a separate memory location and
marked with a unique “tag”.
Regarding memory: In general, people report remembering more information consistent
with their schemas, but information inconsistent with their schemas may be strongly
present in memory too.
PRIMING: WHICH SCHEMA S GU IDE OU R T HOUG HT?
Priming: a situation that occurs when stimuli or events increase the availability in
memory or consciousness of specific types of information held in memory. Schemas can
be temporarily activated by priming.
Unpriming: Refers to the fact that the effects of the schemas tend to persist until they
are somehow expressed in thought or behaviour and only then do their effects decrease.
If primed schemas are not expressed, their effects may persist for long periods of time.
The stronger and better-developed our schemas are, the more likely they are to influence
our thinking, and especially our memory for social information.
SCHEMA PERSISTE NCE: WHY EVE N DISCREDITE D SCHEMA S
CAN SOMET IME S INFLUE NCE OU R T HOUG HT BEHAV IOUR
, Perseverance effect: The tendency for beliefs and schemas to remain unchanged even
in the face of contradictory information.
Evidence suggests that schemas can be self-fulfilling – they both shape and reflect the
social world.
Schemas help us make sense of the social world and process information efficiently, but
they can also lock us into acting in ways that create the world we expect.
REA SONING BY META PHOR: HOW SOCIAL ATT ITUDES A ND
BEHAV IOUR A RE A FF ECTE D BY FIGURES O F SPEE CH
Metaphor: A linguistic device that relates or draws a comparison between one abstract
thought and another dissimilar concept.
Because metaphors can activate different kinds of social knowledge, they can influence
how we interpret events.
SU 2.2. HEURISTICS: HOW WE REDUCE O UR E FF ORT IN
SOCIAL COGNITION
Social cognition: The manner in which we interpret, analyse, remember, and use
information about the social world.
Heuristics: Simple rules for making complex decisions or drawing inferences in a rapid
and seemingly effortless manner.
Affect: our current feelings and moods.
When we are subjected to more information than what we are capable of processing at
one time, this results in information overload.
Processing capacity can be diminished by stress levels.
We rely on heuristics because they allow us to do more, with less effort.
REPRESENTAT IVE NESS : JUDGING BY RESEMBLANCE
Prototype: Summary of the common attributes possessed by members of a category.
Representativeness heuristic: A strategy for making judgements based on the extent to
which current stimuli or events resemble other stimuli or categories.
Decisions based on the representative heuristic can be wrong, because they tend to
ignore base rates.
Base rates: the frequency with which given events or patterns occur in the total
population.
Cultural groups differ in the extent to which they rely on the representative heuristic and
expect “like to go with like” in terms of causes and effects.
Compared to North Americans, Asians rely less on the representative heuristic.
, AVA ILABILITY: “IF I CAN RET RIEVE INSTA NCES, T HEY MU ST
BE FREQUE NT”
Availability heuristic: A strategy for making judgments on the basis of how easily
specific kinds of information can be brought to mind.
Use of availability heuristic can cause us to overestimate the likelihood of events that are
dramatic but rare because they are easy to bring to mind.
When using the availability heuristic, the amount of information we can recall is also
influential.
If the judgement involves emotions or feelings, we tend to rely on the “ease” rule,
whereas if the judgement involves facts or if the task is inherently difficult, we tend to
rely more on the “amount” rule.
ANCHORING A ND A DJUSTME NT: WHERE YOU BEGIN MA KES
A DIFF ERENCE
Anchoring and adjustment heuristic: A heuristic that involves the tendency to use a
number, value, or personal experience as a starting point to which we then make
adjustments. An example is when a seller sets the price higher than he expects to get, and
a buyer bids lower than he is willing to pay.
We have a tendency to let initial anchors influence our judgements.
Although we make adjustments to anchors, these adjustments are often not sufficient to
overcome the initial impact of the anchors.
The tendency to make insufficient judgements is greater when people are in a state in
which they are less capable of engaging in effortful thought.
STATU S QUO HEURISTIC: “WHAT IS, IS GOO D”
When people are asked to make judgements and choices, they seem to act as though they
believe the status quo is good. For example, the brand that has been on the market
longer is better than the newer brand.
SU 2.3. A UTOMAT IC A ND CONTROLL ED PROCESS ING:
TWO BASIC MO DES O F T HOUGHT
Social thought can occur in either of two different ways: in a systematic, logical, and
highly effortful manner (controlled processing), or in a fast, relatively effortless, and
intuitive manner (automatic processing). Both may occur together.
Research suggests that people have two different neural systems for processing social
information – one that operates in an automatic manner, and one that operates in a
systematic and controlled manner.
