100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

OCR Paper 2 Law Revision SUMMARY

Puntuación
5.0
(1)
Vendido
3
Páginas
11
Subido en
15-06-2023
Escrito en
2022/2023

Hiya! These are my summary notes for OCR Law Paper 2! Every single topic has been summarised and have been given full marks. All information may not need to be included within an exam question, but the simple bullet points ensured that I achieved an A* overall in my Y13 mock exams! Having just sat my Law A Level, this notes that I have made definitely made me feel confident going into the exam, and to be honest they felt like a breeze! I hope that if and when you purchase my notes, they are just as good as help to you as they were for me!

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Nivel de Estudio
Editores
Tema
Curso

Información del documento

Subido en
15 de junio de 2023
Número de páginas
11
Escrito en
2022/2023
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

LAW PAPER 2
PRE-LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
Idea stage – ideas for new laws come from pressure groups and the Law Commission
Consultation stage – idea discussed with experts and interested parties
Initial idea written onto green paper
Firm proposal written onto white paper
Drafting stage – known as a bill whilst it passes through Parliament
Private bills affect a small amount of people, introduced by local councils
Public bills affect the whole country
Government bills – ideas come from manifestos
Private Member’s bills – ideas come from backbench MPs, may waste time by false arguments
Successful Private Member’s bill – Sydney Silverman abolition of the death penalty in 1965

LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
Process typically starts in the House of Commons
First reading – title and main aims read out by MP sponsoring bill, if enough votes to proceed, date
is set for second reading
Second reading – HOC debates the bill, aye or no door, speaker announces whether the “ayes”
have it
Committee stage – Public Bill Committee scrutinise the bill and make suggestions
Report stage – Public Bill Committee report back to the HOC
Third reading – final read through of the bill, continues to second chamber
House of Lords – process repeated, and HOL suggest changes, no power to prevent, power to
delay, HOC may use Parliamentary Acts to bypass the HOL, example of this is the Hunting Act 2005
Royal assent – Monarch signs bill and it becomes an Act of Parliament

LEGISLATIVE PROCESS EVALUATION
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
7 stage process allows bill to be scrutinised Lengthy process means that some bills run out
effectively and checked for errors of time so either have to be reintroduced or
not at all, may lead to rushed bills such as the
Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
Whip system ensures that MPs vote for their Whip system seen as undemocratic, whips are
party and support them, especially for passing accused of using bullying tactics
important bills
House of Lords restrict powers and can delay House of Lords is unelected and therefore
bills for up to one year (or one month for undemocratic
money bills), cannot prevent a bill from
becoming a law
First reading allows for the opposition to obtain Legal academics such as Professor Zander
a copy of the bills and prepare their arguments argue that the first reading is a “pure moment
for the debate in the second reading of nothing” and a “waste of time”

TYPES OF DELEGATED LEGISLATION
Bylaws – made by local councils, granted power through Local Government Act
Example – public corporations such as bus services can impose fines for non-payment of fares
Orders in Council – made by Privy Council, used in times of emergency under Emergency Powers
Act
Example – outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease 2001
Statutory Instruments – made by government ministers and their departments
Example – Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 allowed Home Secretary to add dogs to the list if deemed
necessary
Affirmative Resolution – legislation requires approval from Parliament
Negative Resolution – if legislation isn’t rejected within 40 days, it automatically becomes law

NEEDS FOR DELEGATED LEGISLATION
Lack of parliamentary time – pass responsibility onto others to allow Parliament to focus on more
important, national laws
Quicker to pass – legislation doesn’t have to be passed through the pre-legislative or legislative
process
More easily amended – some laws need constant changing in emergencies (Coronavirus restrictions
to reduce the spread)
Technical expertise – expert knowledge on certain areas, they know what laws need to be put in
place for that certain area

CONTROLS BY PARLIAMENT ON DELEGATED LEGISLATION
Enabling Act – must be worded correctly to enforce the correct procedure that must be followed

, LAW PAPER 2
Joint Select Committee on Statutory Instruments – scrutinise statutory instrument, make HOC and
HOL aware of any issues
HOL Delegated Powers Scrutiny Committee – check bills that delegate future law making, report
any findings
Affirmative Resolution – grants law making powers to Government Ministers, must be approved by
Parliament
Negative Resolution – Parliament can cancel a piece of legislation within 40 days, if not cancelled,
automatically becomes law




CONTROLS BY THE COURT (JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCESS)
Ultra Vires – going beyond the powers that were granted within the Enabling Act, judge declares
legislation void
Substantive UV – courts hold that the creator of the legislation has gone beyond the powers
granted to them
Ann Summers v Jobcentre Plus – Jobcentre refused to advertise jobs for Ann Summers
Procedural UV – piece of legislation is unlawful because the correct procedure wasn’t followed
Aylesbury Mushroom – minister failed to consult relevant parties (Mushroom Growers Association)
which was required
Unreasonableness – courts hold that there was no power to make unreasonable legal rules
Strickland v Hayes – prohibited singing or reciting obscene language, covered acts done in private
as well as public

DELEGATED LEGISLATION EVALUATION
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Saves parliamentary time, allows Parliament to Parliamentary controls aren’t always effective,
focus on more important, national laws some legislation may be rushed through
Allows laws to be made by parties who have Lack of public knowledge for the laws, 3000
technical expertise, expert knowledge on statutory instruments are passed each year,
certain areas may be unclear
Laws can be made in emergency situations Scrutiny of such a large amount of legislation
under the Emergency Powers Act, allows fast may be difficult to keep up with, laws passed
response to issues with mistakes
Laws can be easily amended and revoked if Delegated legislation is undemocratic,
they aren’t working disrespects parliamentary sovereignty, not
held accountable for errors

CONTROLS ON DELEGATED LEGISLATION EVALUATION
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Parliament has the initial control through use Enabling Acts sometimes unclear, Dangerous
of an Enabling Act, respects parliamentary Dogs Act 1991
sovereignty
Affirmative Resolution uses a debate to Affirmative Resolution takes up parliamentary
scrutinise the statutory instrument, time, MPs don’t have to turn up to the debate
standardised procedure leads to more which wastes time further
consistencies
Negative Resolution ensures the piece of Negative Resolution may not be looked at or
delegated legislation is given to Parliament to debated within 40 days, high chance that
allow them to effectively scrutinise of debate unclear laws are passed, doesn’t uphold public
any issues confidence
Joint Select Committee on Statutory Joint Select Committee on Statutory
Instruments are able to effectively scrutinise Instruments can only suggest amendments, no
delegated legislation and check for any errors, power to actually change the legislations
ensuring that the power given was appropriate

LITERAL RULE
Definition – judge takes ordinary, natural meaning despite it leading to an absurd outcome
DPP v Cheeseman – Town Police Clauses Act, offence to expose yourself to “passengers”
L&NER v Berriman – lookout provided to those working on tracks, husband was “maintaining”
Whitley v Chappell – offence to impersonate a person “entitled” to vote, dead person isn’t entitled
to vote
Fisher v Bell – Offensive Weapons Act, flick knives in shop window was invitation to treat, not an
“offer for sale”
$42.87
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada


Documento también disponible en un lote

Reseñas de compradores verificados

Se muestran los comentarios
1 año hace

5.0

1 reseñas

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Reseñas confiables sobre Stuvia

Todas las reseñas las realizan usuarios reales de Stuvia después de compras verificadas.

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
milliehartracing (self)
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
10
Miembro desde
2 año
Número de seguidores
6
Documentos
0
Última venta
1 año hace

5.0

2 reseñas

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes