Prosthetic CPM Solved With Correct Answers.

Prosthetic CPM Solved With Correct Answers. TF Bench Alignment - Answer 5* socket flexion (+contracture) 6-7* socket adduction (or match sound) Socket medial wall parallel to line of progression Knee: 5-25 mm posterior to weightline, external rotation 3-5* Foot: 12-37mm outset from IT, 5-7* external rotation TT Bench Alignment - Answer 5* socket flexion (+contracture) 5* socket adduction (or match sound) Foot: 37mm posterior to midline (SACH) or 1/3 of foot (DR) Foot: 12 mm inset to midlineder Info for Px Eval - Answer Name, Age, DOB, Sex Ht, Wt Meds, comorbidities Amp site/cause/date ADLs/vocational/avocational Goals! Home status/environment Work status/environment PT/OT, assistive devices used Current/previous px treatment MMT, ROM Sensation Condition of residual limb Condition of contralateral/upper extremities K-level/AMP K0 - Answer The patient does not have the ability or potential to ambulate or transfer safely K1 - Answer Prosthesis for transfers or ambulation at fixed cadence; household ambulator K2 - Answer Ability to traverse low level environmental barriers; limited community ambulator, fixed cadence K3 - Answer Ambulation at variable cadence; prosthetic utilization beyond simple locomotion; "unlimited" community ambulator, traverse most environmental barriers K4 - Answer Exceeds basic ambulation skills, exhibiting high impact, stress, or energy levels; child, active adult, or athlete. K1 feet - Answer SACH, Single axis, safe K2 feet - Answer Multiaxial, flexible keel K3-4 - Answer Dynamic response (also often multiaxial) With vertical shock Prosthetic CPM Solved With Correct Answers. Shock & torque absorbers External power feet - Answer K1-3, all cadence/terrain Pros: propulsion, dorsi/plantarflexion Cons: batteries/weight/cost/processing speed Single axis feet - Answer Pros: inexpensive, durable Cons: rigid forefoot, not energy efficient, not suitable for uneven surfaces SACH feet - Answer Pros: provides stability in early stance Cons: DF stop increases knee hyperextesion Flexible keel - Answer Pros: provides easy rollover, smooth transition from heel strike to toe off, allows natural sagittal plane motion, reduces socket foreces on residual limb, improves walking safety, reliable Cons: limited push off, increased cost Multiaxial feet - Answer Pros: Accommodates uneven terrain, decreases stress on skin and prosthesis Con: Increased weight/maintenance, cost Dynamic Response feet - Answer Pros: use with increased activity level, energy storing, reduces impact to joints and the residual limb, decreased walking effort/increased push off Cons: increased cost/weight K1-K2 knees - control - Answer Fiction/mechanical - single speed ambulators May have manual lock feature Weight activated stance control K3-4 knees - control - Answer Fluid (cadence responsiveness) hydraulic or pneumatic -Pros: variable cadence, swing and stance control, more natural gait -Cons: increased weight/maintenance/cost Microprocessor (fluid controlled by "computer chip") Microprocessor knees - Answer Pros: improve environmental obstacle negotiation, increased walking speed on uneven terrain, reduced falls, increased confidence Cons: heavy.