cla1503-notes-summary-commercial-law
.
, lOMoARcPSD|4183485
Module 1
←
The South African Legal System
←
o Law is a social science.
o South African Law is not codified: recorded in one comprehensive
piece of legislation.
← Origin:
o Indigenous legal systems applied at the southernmost tip of Africa
before 1652.
o Jan van Riebeeck arrives in Cape Town in 1652 and the adoption
of Roman-Dutch law as a legalsystem to the Cape.
← Sources of South African law
o Some are authoritative: courts are bound by authoritative sources
o Others have merely persuasive authority: serves to convince a court
to apply or interpret a rule in a particular way.
Corpus Iuris Civilis: codification of Roman law that is a primary authoritative
source on which South African courts draw when reverting to Roman Law to
solve a legal problem.
←
← The order in which SA law is consulted:
←
←
← Customary law
o Does not consist of written rules but develops from the habits of the
community and is carried down from generation to generation
o A customary rule will be recognized as a legal rule when:
o It must be reasonable
o It must have existed for a long time
, lOMoARcPSD|4183485
o It must be generally recognized and observed by the
community
o It must be certain and clear
←
← The Courts in the Republic
Persuasive Power:
High courts in other areas of jurisdiction
← SA Courts is devided in: Superior Courts – 1. Constitutional
Court
2. Supreme Court of Appeal
3. High Court – Full Bench
- Two Judge Bench
- Single Judge
Lower Courts - 4. Magistrate Court
5. Small Claims Court
←
← The Doctrine of Stare Decisis
o The judgments of the superior courts are one of the most important
sources of the law.
o The function of a judge is to state, interpret and apply the existing
law but not to make a new law.
o Nevertheless, the effect of a judicial decision which gives new
interpretation to a statutory provision or which abstracts, extends or
adapts a common law principle, is in many cases to create law.
, lOMoARcPSD|4183485
o Law so created is termed ‘judge-made law’. Because a later court does
not depart lightly from the decisions of an earlier court, this judge-
made law becomes established legal rule.
o The court or judge does not purposefully set out to create a law.
Application of the Doctrine
← Stare Decisis : The decision stands.
o Obviously, when a court gives a decision, the parties to the dispute
will be bound by the decision.
o The doctrine of Stare Decisis would mean that a later court would be
bound by the earlier decision regardless of whether or not the
earlier decision could be regarded as correct.
o South African courts follow a middle course. A court is bound by its
own decisions unless and until they are overruled by a superior court.
The doctrine of stare Decisis and the hierarchy of courts
o Every court is bound by the decisions of the superior court within its
area of jurisdiction. Thus a High Court regardless of the amount of
judges is bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeal; a
bench of 2 judges is bound by a decision of the full bench and a single
judge by the decisions either of the two just mentioned.
o Every court is bound by the decision of a court of concurrent status
within its own area of jurisdiction. Thus the Supreme Court of Appeal is
bound by its previous judgments (even a bench of 5 judges by a bench
of 3). A full bench of a High Court is similarly bound by an earlier full
bench decision, a 2 bench by a 2 bench and a single judge by an earlier
decision by a single judge.
o One High Court is not bound to follow the decisions of another High
Court since they belong to different jurisdictions. The High Court
from another jurisdiction will, however, serve as a persuasive
authority.
o Magistrate’s courts are bound by the judgments of the Supreme Court
of Appeal and the High Courts. If the judgments of the High Courts are
conflicting, a magistrate should follow the decision of the High Court in
whose jurisdiction it falls.
Ratio Decidendi: The reason for the decision – which is binding and which is
the subject of the doctrine of stare Decisis.
.
, lOMoARcPSD|4183485
Module 1
←
The South African Legal System
←
o Law is a social science.
o South African Law is not codified: recorded in one comprehensive
piece of legislation.
← Origin:
o Indigenous legal systems applied at the southernmost tip of Africa
before 1652.
o Jan van Riebeeck arrives in Cape Town in 1652 and the adoption
of Roman-Dutch law as a legalsystem to the Cape.
← Sources of South African law
o Some are authoritative: courts are bound by authoritative sources
o Others have merely persuasive authority: serves to convince a court
to apply or interpret a rule in a particular way.
Corpus Iuris Civilis: codification of Roman law that is a primary authoritative
source on which South African courts draw when reverting to Roman Law to
solve a legal problem.
←
← The order in which SA law is consulted:
←
←
← Customary law
o Does not consist of written rules but develops from the habits of the
community and is carried down from generation to generation
o A customary rule will be recognized as a legal rule when:
o It must be reasonable
o It must have existed for a long time
, lOMoARcPSD|4183485
o It must be generally recognized and observed by the
community
o It must be certain and clear
←
← The Courts in the Republic
Persuasive Power:
High courts in other areas of jurisdiction
← SA Courts is devided in: Superior Courts – 1. Constitutional
Court
2. Supreme Court of Appeal
3. High Court – Full Bench
- Two Judge Bench
- Single Judge
Lower Courts - 4. Magistrate Court
5. Small Claims Court
←
← The Doctrine of Stare Decisis
o The judgments of the superior courts are one of the most important
sources of the law.
o The function of a judge is to state, interpret and apply the existing
law but not to make a new law.
o Nevertheless, the effect of a judicial decision which gives new
interpretation to a statutory provision or which abstracts, extends or
adapts a common law principle, is in many cases to create law.
, lOMoARcPSD|4183485
o Law so created is termed ‘judge-made law’. Because a later court does
not depart lightly from the decisions of an earlier court, this judge-
made law becomes established legal rule.
o The court or judge does not purposefully set out to create a law.
Application of the Doctrine
← Stare Decisis : The decision stands.
o Obviously, when a court gives a decision, the parties to the dispute
will be bound by the decision.
o The doctrine of Stare Decisis would mean that a later court would be
bound by the earlier decision regardless of whether or not the
earlier decision could be regarded as correct.
o South African courts follow a middle course. A court is bound by its
own decisions unless and until they are overruled by a superior court.
The doctrine of stare Decisis and the hierarchy of courts
o Every court is bound by the decisions of the superior court within its
area of jurisdiction. Thus a High Court regardless of the amount of
judges is bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeal; a
bench of 2 judges is bound by a decision of the full bench and a single
judge by the decisions either of the two just mentioned.
o Every court is bound by the decision of a court of concurrent status
within its own area of jurisdiction. Thus the Supreme Court of Appeal is
bound by its previous judgments (even a bench of 5 judges by a bench
of 3). A full bench of a High Court is similarly bound by an earlier full
bench decision, a 2 bench by a 2 bench and a single judge by an earlier
decision by a single judge.
o One High Court is not bound to follow the decisions of another High
Court since they belong to different jurisdictions. The High Court
from another jurisdiction will, however, serve as a persuasive
authority.
o Magistrate’s courts are bound by the judgments of the Supreme Court
of Appeal and the High Courts. If the judgments of the High Courts are
conflicting, a magistrate should follow the decision of the High Court in
whose jurisdiction it falls.
Ratio Decidendi: The reason for the decision – which is binding and which is
the subject of the doctrine of stare Decisis.
