100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary Operations Management Chapter 9

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
6
Subido en
26-04-2016
Escrito en
2015/2016

Summary of Chapter 9. All important aspects of the chapter explained in just enough detail, easy to understand.

Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

¿Un libro?
No
¿Qué capítulos están resumidos?
Chapter 9
Subido en
26 de abril de 2016
Número de páginas
6
Escrito en
2015/2016
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

9. Managing quality
Quality: all the features/characteristics of a product/service that allow it to satisfy sated/implied
needs
 Is relative, you should compare a thing with other similar things
 Fitness for purpose
 Doing what it is supposed to do (how long will a product/service perform at the standard it
is expected to?)
 Idea of reliability (how long will something work for at the desired quality level?)
 Product/service free of deficiencies (Crosby), based on the Japanese of ‘zero defects’ –
doing it right first time.

Operations managers need to do two things:
 Design products/services in such a way that they meet customer expectations (be fit for
purpose) and to do so consistently over time (be reliable)
 Make products/deliver service in such a way that meets these design criteria.

Two types of conformance criteria
 Variables: features that can be measured on a scale of some kind.
 Attributes: features that are either present or not present.
» A light bulb may have a bayonet fitting or not (attribute) and give out a specified amount of light
in lumens (variable).

Challenges of quality
 Quality is also rated by customers themselves – due to the growth of the internet customers
can go online and rate products/services.
Conformance – in assembly line operations, many thousands of parts may be produced to
make hundreds of finished products in a day, every single component has to work. And in
mass service operations, there can be thousands of service encounters every day, each of
which also has to meet customer expectations.

Quality gap model
Model that identifies five main ways in which quality may be lower than desired.

How an organization ‘designs’ it
Gap 1. Positioning: develops if the product/service concept diverges from customer
requirements.
Gap 2. Specification: the difference between actual standards set by management
compared with
manager’s understanding of customer needs (managers specify a standard lower
than that
expected by customers).
Belief that customers’ expectations are unrealistic/unachievable
View that failure to deliver of one feature of a product/service can be more
than compensated by other features
Concern that over-delivery of features will erode margins and reduce the
return on investment
How employees ‘handle’ it
Gap 3. Delivery: develops where employees don’t or can’t make a product or deliver a
service to the
standard required.
Gap 4. Communication: the basis on which the customers build their expectations,
therefore
organizations need to ensure that marketing, advertising and promotion doesn’t
make a
promise that they can’t keep.
Gap 5. Perception: difference between what the customer expected and what they
perceived they got;
manager has no/little direct control.

Ga Name Definition
p
1 Positioning Between management perceptions of customer expectations and the
expectations themselves (management perceptions of expectations)

, 2 Specification Between management perceptions of customer expectations and the
actual product/service specified
3 Delivery Between the product/service promised and that actually delivered
4 Communicati Between the product/service actually delivered and that externally
on communicated to customers (e.g. through advertising)
5 Perception Between the product/service quality perceived and that expected by the
customer


Cost of quality – the PAF model
If an organization tries to ensure quality but fails to do so, this may lead to extra cost; quality cost.
There are four categories:
 Prevention: cots of setting up standards and a system to maintain them (training staff,
preparing purchase specifications, developing standards, monitoring and documentation
procedures); preventing defects before they happen.
 Assurance/appraisal: cost of actually maintain standards (resources required for inspection,
measurement and documentation cost of surveys and audits); identifying defects before
guests do.
 Failure:
o Internal failure: cost due to waste/losses before the product reaches the customer
(rejection of raw materials, losses due to faulty storage, downtime, scrap, rework).
 Rework: some aspects of a service/products must be performed again
 Scrap: defective item is unfit for further processing.
o External failure: costs due to defective items reaching the customer (warranty
costs, poor word-to-mouth, ultimately marketing costs and loss of repeat business).

If greater emphasis is placed on prevention and assurance, total cost falls because internal and
external failure costs decline.




Price of non-conformance (PONC - Crosby): the cost to management of not getting it right first time
and every time; the cost of internal and external failure.
» Calculating this cost is difficult, because the value of lost repeat business and customer
dissatisfaction is not easy to assess.

Standard costs (for specific failure events) x the number of such failure events.

Alternative strategies for managing quality
Quality inspection (QI): inspect product before it is sold to the customer (housekeeping); after it is
being produced.
 Set up a specification for product
 Cost it
 Detect any defects before delivering/selling it to the end user

» Problems:
 In MPOs are the costs of rework and scrap – once a fault/error is detected it is too late to do
anything about it.
 Not workable in CPOs, because product and consumption happen at the same time
(customer=inspector).
 Decreases staff motivation, as it tends to accentuate negative feedback in terms of
performance.
 System can only be improved by increased inspection (creating cost), therefore often a
trade-off between quality and cost occur.

Quality control (QC): after designing the quality level and setting standards, the manager will check
on conformance, at several stages in the total process; processes designed to monitor
production/operations in order to maintain quality.
 Quality inspecots (internally)
 Quality audits (management)
$3.63
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
jessieslegers
1.0
(1)

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
jessieslegers NHTV
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
3
Miembro desde
9 año
Número de seguidores
2
Documentos
11
Última venta
7 año hace

1.0

1 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes