100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary Alle artikelen van pro 3

Puntuación
-
Vendido
1
Páginas
14
Subido en
16-10-2022
Escrito en
2022/2023

Alle artikelen van pro 3 in 1 document samengevat

Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
16 de octubre de 2022
Número de páginas
14
Escrito en
2022/2023
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Hot Lights and Cold Steel: Cultural and Political Toolkits for Practice Change in Surgery, Katherine C.
Kellogg

Current Literature on Practice Challenge and Change by Less Powerful Organization Members

Using Cultural Toolkits to Challenge and Change Traditional Practice

- How and when do less powerful organization members challenge and change traditional
work practices that disadvantage them?
- More recently, theorists have conceptualized culture as enabling rather than constraining >
culture can offer opportunities for questioning and altering traditional work practices in
organizations
- Three kinds of cultural tools are important to the analysis presented in this paper: injustice
frames, alternative identities, and contentious tactics

Injustice frames

- organization members do not consider alternatives
- Injustice frames are arguments that allow less powerful members to define traditional
practices as questionable or wrong > they create a new cultural opportunity for less powerful
members inside organizations. Less powerful members can bring frames created elsewhere
into their own organization’s cultural toolkit and adapt these frames for use in their own
setting



Alternative Identities

- identities from social environments and settings quite foreign to their own, and they can
include such elements as dress, narratives, or even religious practices



Contentious Tactics

- challenge defenders individually and covertly
- A repertoire of contentious tactics is simply a collection of practices, often created by a social
movement, that the less powerful inside organizations can draw from to challenge the status
quo and its defenders



- It’s possible that there is access to only a restricted set of frames, identities, and tactics that
supported the status quo
- These theorists characterize institutional environments as enabling different levels of
challenge and change according to differences in both cultural opportunities and political
opportunities
- This research helps us understand how political opportunities in addition to cultural
opportunities enable social movement activism by less powerful members in our wider
society
- The methods used in this paper are inductive, All three hospitals were elite teaching
hospitals whose organizational structures—as manifested in roles and relationships among
the directors, staff surgeons, residents, and interns—were remarkably consistent

, - The macro-level analysis details the cultural and political opportunities available in the
institutional context of surgery over time
- The micro-level analysis entailed detailing the challenge and change of scutwork practices
that occurred in each of the three hospitals



 Weak Cultural Opportunities for Change in Pacific’s Institutional Context
- In the late 1970s, there were few cultural opportunities available in the institutional context
 Weak Cultural Tools for Change in Pacific’s Cultural Toolkit
- lack of cultural opportunities in the institutional context directly shaped the cultural toolkit
available within Pacific
 No Micromobilization by Interns and Their Colleagues at Pacific
- Because the cultural tools available for interns at Pacific were so weak, there was little to
provoke them to reinterpret scutwork practices as unfair, to develop a “we” feeling with
other reformers, or to challenge defenders of the status quo.
 No Change in Scutwork Practices at Pacific
- Because interns had no strong cultural tools for change, they did not mobilize with one
another, did not challenge defenders, and did not change traditional scutwork practices



Strong Cultural Opportunities and Tools but Only Minor Change at Boot Camp

 Strong Cultural Opportunities for Change in Boot Camp’s Institutional Context
- Patients’ rights and residents’ rights groups argued that hospitals were using residents as
“cheap labor” and that long resident work hours were harmful to the care of patients and the
health of residents, In this context, injustice frames were much more available
- External reformers also offered new identities to interns that had not been available in the
late 1970s and that afforded them with new self-understandings
 Strong Cultural Tools for Change in Boot Camp’s Cultural Toolkit
- Interns and their colleagues within Boot Camp were aware of the frames, identities, and
tactics created by social movement activists, so these became available in the cultural toolkit
at Boot Camp
 Cultural Micromobilization by Interns and Their Colleagues at Boot Camp
- The strong cultural tools available to interns at Boot Camp led them to reinterpret scutwork
practices as unfair, to develop a we feeling with other reformers, and to covertly challenge
scutwork practices
 But Only Minor Change in Scutwork Practices at Boot Camp.
- their challenges tended to be sporadic, covert, and individual, and thus they were not able to
make significant change



Strong Cultural and Political Opportunities and Tools and Major Change at Advent

 Similar Cultural Opportunities and Tools at Advent
- Advent interns had a cultural toolkit similar to the one their counterparts at Boot Camp had
 But Major Change in Scutwork Practices at Advent
- interns across the board at Advent were frequently sharing scutwork with staff surgeons,
daytime chiefs and seniors, and seniors covering overnight
$4.27
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
SophieBos1 Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
47
Miembro desde
5 año
Número de seguidores
34
Documentos
40
Última venta
7 meses hace
Alles voor een voldoende

Alles wat je nodig hebt om je tentamens te halen op de Radboud Universiteit

3.7

3 reseñas

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes