INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH ETHICS QUIZ
SUMMARY
SCORE FOR THIS MODULE: 100%
1. The ‘conflict of mission’ in research refers to the potential conflict between:
1. preventing harm to an individual, and 2. gaining scientific k…
• True Your correct answer
• False
2. Which of the following should not be included as part of the research protocol
and submitted to the REC (ERC)?
• The budget, including sources of funding
• Curricula vitae of the Principal Investigator and the core research team
• The information sheet and consent form that potential participants will be
asked to sign
• A section on the ethical aspects of the protocol, and how the investigators are
planning to deal with the ethical issues that may arise
• If the protocol has also been reviewed elsewhere, a list of the ethics
committee members who reviewed the protocol Your correct answer
• A description of how data will be kept confidential and private
3. The Secretariat of an ethics committee can overturn the decision of a committee if
they find it unreasonable
• True
• False Your correct answer
4. Following an animated discussion and after much debate, an REC has decided not
to approve a research study that is utilizing a placebo control desi…
• Explain the Committee’s rationale, and share the detailed comments made by
members of the Committee in order to diffuse the situation and provide a better
understanding of the REC functioning
• Refuse to enter into any discussion with the PI but invite him to share their views
with the REC Secretariat, citing confidentiality as a rationale Your correct answer
5. Ethics committee members should consider the following issues when reviewing
a protocol:
• have research risks have been minimised?
• is appropriate information being provided to participants in a
comprehensible way?
• are there appropriate provisions to protect privacy and confidentiality?
• are the proposed inducements for participants to take part in
research appropriate?
• all of the above Your correct answer
6. It is often said that 'bad science is unethical'. Please choose the best follow-up sentence.
• However, research ethics committees are not qualified to judge the science
, of a protocol and should therefore not consider the science in their
protocol reviewHowever, if the protocol has been reviewed and 'approved'
by a scientific or technical committee prior to ethical review, the ethics
committee should set aside their doubts as experts have already provided
input
• Ethics review committees should, therefore, consider the science of the protocol
where it has an impact on the ethics of the study Your correct answer
• However, this statement is false. Science and ethics are completely separate
issues and should never be considered by the same committee. This is
supported by all WHO guidance
7. Ethical review is necessary if researchers are to:
• ensure that the rights and well-being of research participants and
communities are protected
• comply with guidance and regulation for research
• meet the requirements of some funders and journals
• all of the above Your correct answer
8. Research is necessary to:
• gain generalizable knowledge which may lead to improvements in health
Your correct answer
• benefit individual research participants
9. The interests of an individual in research can be overridden in research if it is
expected to provide significant benefits to society.
• True
• False Your correct answer
10. Benchmarks of ethical research include: (select all that
apply)
• fair selection of study populations Your correct answer
• favourable risk/benefit ratios in research Your correct answer
• ethical review of protocols by funding agencies
• respect for participants and communities Your correct answer
11. Ethics committees should consider the sociocultural, economic and political contexts
of research when reviewing protocols
• True Your correct answer
• False
12. Ethical challenges in research in low and middle income settings include:
• research participants may have limited literacy and familiarity with
research concepts
• limited healthcare services may provide significant incentives for participants to
take part in research
• local researchers may have limited resources and ability to negotiate with
international sponsors to ensure that research protocols are amended to
make them appropriate for the local research context.
• all of the above Your correct answer