100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Test Bank for Research Methods, Statistics, and Applications, 2nd Edition

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
17
Grado
A+
Subido en
24-02-2022
Escrito en
2021/2022

Test Bank for Research Methods, Statistics, and Applications, 2nd Edition Chapter 1: Thinking Like a Researcher Test Bank Multiple Choice 1. Which of the following is the best definition of critical thinking? A. a process of evaluating information based on one’s personal experiences B. a process of considering information based on current knowledge in a field while carefully avoiding personal bias C. a process of criticizing current knowledge in a field D. a process of unquestionably following what experts in a field suggest Ans: B Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Thinking Critically About Ethics Difficulty Level: Medium 2. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Nuremberg code? A. Nazi experiments B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments C. Milgram’s obedience study D. Zimbardo’s prison study Ans: A Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Medium 3. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Belmont code? A. Nazi experiments B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments C. Milgram’s obedience study D. Zimbardo’s prison study Ans: B Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Medium 4. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments occurred in what country? A. Germany B. England C. United States D. Mexico Ans: C Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Knowledge Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Easy 5. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments are considered unethical because of the use of ______. A. debriefing B. informed consent C. deception D. coercive incentives Ans: C Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Easy

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado










Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
24 de febrero de 2022
Número de páginas
17
Escrito en
2021/2022
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Test Bank for Research Methods, Statistics,
and Applications, 2nd Edition, Kathrynn A.
Adams, Eva K. Lawrence

,Chapter 1: Thinking Like a Researcher
Test Bank
Multiple Choice

1. Which of the following is the best definition of critical thinking?
A. a process of evaluating information based on one’s personal experiences
B. a process of considering information based on current knowledge in a field while
carefully avoiding personal bias
C. a process of criticizing current knowledge in a field
D. a process of unquestionably following what experts in a field suggest
Ans: B
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Thinking Critically About Ethics
Difficulty Level: Medium

2. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Nuremberg code?
A. Nazi experiments
B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments
C. Milgram’s obedience study
D. Zimbardo’s prison study
Ans: A
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Medium

3. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Belmont code?
A. Nazi experiments
B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments
C. Milgram’s obedience study
D. Zimbardo’s prison study
Ans: B
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Medium

4. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments occurred in what country?
A. Germany
B. England

, C. United States
D. Mexico
Ans: C
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Knowledge
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Easy

5. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments are considered unethical because of the use of
______.
A. debriefing
B. informed consent
C. deception
D. coercive incentives
Ans: C
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Easy

6. Which of the following was a social psychological experiment that is considered
ethically questionable because of the use of deception?
A. Milgram’s obedience study
B. Zimbardo’s prison experiment
C. Tuskegee Study
D. Nuremburg Study
Ans: A
Learning Objective: 1-2: How to think critically about research ethics, including
understanding and applying the ethical principles and standards of your discipline.
Cognitive Domain: Knowledge
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Medium

7. Which of the following was a social psychological experiment that is considered
ethically questionable because of the emotional and psychological risk incurred by
participants?
A. Milgram’s obedience study
B. Zimbardo’s prison experiment
C. Tuskegee Study
D. Nuremburg Study
Ans: B
Learning Objective: 1-2: How to think critically about research ethics, including
understanding and applying the ethical principles and standards of your discipline.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
$10.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
donatrey Harvard University
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
104
Miembro desde
4 año
Número de seguidores
68
Documentos
371
Última venta
1 semana hace

2.2

15 reseñas

5
2
4
1
3
3
2
1
1
8

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes