Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 51 páginas
Examen

MGST 451 FINAL EXAM 291 QUESTIONS WITH VERIFIED ANSWERS,100%CORRECT

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 51 páginas

MGST 451 FINAL EXAM 291 QUESTIONS WITH VERIFIED ANSWERS when managers put their own self-interest ahead of the interest of the shareholders - CORRECT ANSWER agency problem a system of controls, regulations, and incentives designed to prevent fraud. It is a story of conflicts of interest and attempts to minimize them - CORRECT ANSWER corporate governance nearly 80% of institutional investors responded that they would pay a premium for a well governed company - CORRECT ANSWER McKinsey and Company survey 2002 Morocco, 41% - CORRECT ANSWER highest premiums for a well governed company Canada, 11% - CORRECT ANSWER lowest premiums for a well governed company to act in the best interest of the corporation - CORRECT ANSWER Board of Director's duty effective governance should increase the value of equity holders by better aligning incentives between management and shareholders - CORRECT ANSWER shareholder perspective effective governance should support policies that produce stable and safe employment, provide an acceptable standard of living to workers, mitigate risk for debt holders, and improve the community and environment - CORRECT ANSWER stakeholder perspective shareholders, creditors, employees, society - CORRECT ANSWER stakeholders auditors, analysts, investment bankers, financial institutions, credit agencies, attorneys, government, provincial securities regulators, Canada Revenue Agency - CORRECT ANSWER monitors outside the company

Vista previa del contenido

MGST 451 FINAL EXAM 291 QUESTIONS WITH
VERIFIED ANSWERS
when managers put their own self-interest ahead of the interest of the
shareholders - CORRECT ANSWER agency problem


a system of controls, regulations, and incentives designed to prevent fraud. It is a
story of conflicts of interest and attempts to minimize them - CORRECT ANSWER
corporate governance


nearly 80% of institutional investors responded that they would pay a premium
for a well governed company - CORRECT ANSWER McKinsey and Company survey
2002


Morocco, 41% - CORRECT ANSWER highest premiums for a well governed
company


Canada, 11% - CORRECT ANSWER lowest premiums for a well governed company


to act in the best interest of the corporation - CORRECT ANSWER Board of
Director's duty


effective governance should increase the value of equity holders by better aligning
incentives between management and shareholders - CORRECT ANSWER
shareholder perspective

,effective governance should support policies that produce stable and safe
employment, provide an acceptable standard of living to workers, mitigate risk for
debt holders, and improve the community and environment - CORRECT ANSWER
stakeholder perspective


shareholders, creditors, employees, society - CORRECT ANSWER stakeholders


auditors, analysts, investment bankers, financial institutions, credit agencies,
attorneys, government, provincial securities regulators, Canada Revenue Agency -
CORRECT ANSWER monitors outside the company


the knowledge that certain actions are inherently wrong even if they are
undetected and left unpunished - CORRECT ANSWER moral salience


fiduciary, loyalty and fair dealing, care, supervision, candor - CORRECT ANSWER 5
duties of the board


- hire and evaluate management
- approve major operating proposals
- approve major financial decisions
- offer expert advice to management
- make sure the firm's activities and financial condition are accurately reported -
CORRECT ANSWER board functions


- inside (current and former employees, or family members)

,- grey (not directly connected but have existing or potential business relationships,
such as bankers, lawyers or consultants)
- outside (independent) - CORRECT ANSWER types of directors


the company has more than one class of common stock differentiated by the
number of votes assigned to each class (Canadian Tire, Bombadier, Cara, Shopify) -
CORRECT ANSWER dual-class shares voting


requires a director to receive a majority of votes to be elected (85% of S&P500
companies had majority voting) - CORRECT ANSWER majority voting system


allows a shareholder to concentrate votes on a single board candidate rather than
requiring one vote for each candidate (<5% of S&P500) - CORRECT ANSWER
cumulative voting system


- allows raising of capital without threat to loss or dilution of control
- facilitates intergenerational control from founders to heirs
- if they pay preferential dividends to restricted voting shares, they can argue that
the structure appeals to investors with differing interests
- useful in Canada in industries that have Canadian ownership requirements -
CORRECT ANSWER advantages of dual class shares


- controlling superior (little equity with voting control)
- minority superior (superior voting shares but not enough for control)

, - minority restricted (usually hold the most of the equity but voting rights are
insufficient to affect company direction) - CORRECT ANSWER Common
shareholder groups


pay less dividends, share value is discounted about 14% less - CORRECT ANSWER
dual class companies tend to


prevent superior class from obtaining a premium on change of control
transactions, but that doesn't mean they can't charge a premium by relinquishing
their superior rights to unify the class - CORRECT ANSWER coattails provisions


between 5-15% - CORRECT ANSWER premium from coattail provisions


monitoring duties have been compromised by connections or perceived loyalties
to management. Many independent directors nominated by CEO - CORRECT
ANSWER captured board


a board in which an executive on one firm sits on the board of another firm, and
an executive on the second firm sits on the board of the first - CORRECT ANSWER
interlocked board


limit terms, stagger the boards - CORRECT ANSWER methods to avoid interlocked
or captured boards


audit, compensation, governance/nomination - CORRECT ANSWER important BOD
committees

Información del documento

Subido en
24 de julio de 2026
Número de páginas
51
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$19.49

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
paulhans
3.5
(136)
Vendido
796
Seguidores
641
Artículos
7840
Última venta
6 días hace


Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes