Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 51 páginas
Examen

PSYC 290 EXAM PREP UNITS 1 10 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 51 páginas

PSYC 290 EXAM PREP UNITS 1 10 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS

Vista previa del contenido

Fleeson


Give this one a try later!


situational factors are minimal, personality traits shape larger chunks of
behaviour




Factors of mood disorders


Give this one a try later!

,Genetics
- 65% concordance rates for identical twins, 14% for fraternal twins
- creates a predisposition, environmental factors likely determine if the
disorder develops
- stronger genetic influence for bipolar than unipolar
- genetic mapping is inconsistent; constellation of many genes


Neurochemical
- heredity may create predisposition; abnormal levels of serotonin and
norepinephrine (others may be possible); drug therapies affect availability
of those chemicals
- structural abnormalities; depression and reduced hippocampal volume;
memory; 8-10% smaller; suppression of neurogenesis might be the cause;
serotonin promotes neurogenesis


Hormonal Factors
- HPA axis; one of 2 stress pathways; releases cortisol which is elevated in
depressed patients

Dispositional Factors
- Perfectionism: self-oriented, other-oriented, socially-prescribed
- Aaron Beck: two personality styles are related to depression; sociotropic
(please others, avoid interpersonal problems); autonomous (independence
and self-achievement)
- Blatt: introjective personality orientation; excessive self-criticism and
overdependence on others
- personality variables operate as vulnerabilities in response to stressors
related to that specific disposition

Cognitive Factors
- Aaron Beck- negative cognitive triad: negative views of themselves, world
and future; dysfunctional schemas
- Martin Seligman: learned helplessness
- pessimistic explanatory style: attribute setbacks to personal flaws
- hopelessness theory: many factors including pessimistic explanatory style,
high stress, low self-esteem, etc.
- emphasize importance of cognitive reactions
- rumination increases negative thinking, impairing problem-solving,
undermining social support
- cognitive models: negative thinking is what causes depression

Stress
- link between stress and mood disorders is moderately strong; stress also

, affects how people respond to treatment and whether they relapse
- impact of stress varies in part because of varied vulnerability




Social influence tactics


Give this one a try later!


- Foot in the door technique
- Reciprocity norm: pay it forward
- Low ball technique: getting someone to commit to an attractive proposal
before it's hidden costs are revealed




Affective forecasting


Give this one a try later!


predict one's emotional reactions to future events; unreliable




Insight therapies


Give this one a try later!


verbal, increase insight, possible solutions, greatest improvement in early
treatment (13-18 weekly sessions); evaluation is subjective, effects are
reasonably durable, equal efficacy as drug therapy

Psychoanalysis - inner conflicts id, ego, superego, defence mechanisms,
unconscious; resistance - largely unconscious defence mechanisms;
transference - helpful, relationships can be reenacted


Free association - expression of thoughts/feelings

, Client-centred therapy - Rogers; work together as equals, supportive
emotional climate, alleviates incongruence




Cross-sectional


Give this one a try later!


groups of different ages at a single point in time




Group productivity and decision making


Give this one a try later!


Producitivity declines in larger groups
- reduced efficiency; loss of coordination
- social loafing; reduction in effort

Decision making
- risky shift: groups arrived at riskier decisions than individuals
- group polarization: group discussion strengthens a group's dominant
point of view and produces a shift toward a more extreme decision in that
direction
- groupthink: members of a cohesive group emphasize concurrence at the
expense of critical thinking in arriving at a decision; major blunders;
suspend critical judgement; censors dissent; us vs them; confirmation bias;
individuals often fail to share information unique to them; more likely when
there is high group cohensiveness, in isolation, when power structure is
dominate by a strong, decisive leader, when group is under stress to make
a major decision
- group cohensiveness - strength of the liking relationships linking group
members

Información del documento

Subido en
10 de julio de 2026
Número de páginas
51
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$10.50

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Vendido
10
Seguidores
0
Artículos
4644
Última venta
1 mes hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes