Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 43 páginas
Examen

NRS 352 EB Inquiry in Healthcare for the RN to BSN Final Exam 2026 - With Solutions

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 43 páginas

NRS 352 EB Inquiry in Healthcare for the RN to BSN Final Exam 2026 - With SolutionsNRS 352 EB Inquiry in Healthcare for the RN to BSN Final Exam 2026 - With SolutionsNRS 352 EB Inquiry in Healthcare for the RN to BSN Final Exam 2026 - With Solutions

Vista previa del contenido

Clarkson College

Course Number: NRS 352
Course Title: Evidence-Based Inquiry in Healthcare for the RN
to BSN Student
Exam: Final Exam
Date:2026




A nurse is developing a clinical question about reducing catheter-associated infections. Which of
the following best represents a properly structured PICOT question?

A. What causes infections in hospitals?

B. In hospitalized adults, does daily catheter care reduce infection rates compared to no care over
one week?

C. Are infections dangerous?

D. How can nurses improve patient care?

Answer: B

Rationale: PICOT requires Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time for a
focused clinical question.



A researcher conducts a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test a new wound care protocol.
What is the primary strength of this study design?

A. Low cost

B. High level of evidence due to randomization

C. Quick results

1

,D. No ethical concerns

Answer: B

Rationale: RCTs minimize bias and provide strong evidence for causality.



True/False: Systematic reviews provide higher levels of evidence than individual studies.

Answer: True

Rationale: They synthesize multiple studies, increasing reliability.



A nurse critically appraises a study and notes lack of blinding. What bias is most likely introduced?

A. Selection bias

B. Performance bias

C. Recall bias

D. Publication bias

Answer: B

Rationale: Lack of blinding can influence participant or researcher behavior.



Fill in the blank: The process of integrating clinical expertise, patient values, and best research
evidence is called __________.

Answer: Evidence-based practice (EBP)

Rationale: EBP combines research with clinical judgment and patient preferences.



A study finds a p-value of 0.03. What does this indicate?

A. The null hypothesis is proven

B. The result is statistically significant

C. The study is invalid

D. No relationship exists
2

,Answer: B

Rationale: p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.



True/False: Qualitative research focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis.

Answer: False

Rationale: Qualitative research explores experiences and perceptions.



A nurse is reviewing cohort studies. What characteristic defines this design?

A. Participants are randomly assigned

B. Observational follow-up over time

C. Data collected at one point only

D. No comparison group

Answer: B

Rationale: Cohort studies track groups over time to observe outcomes.



Fill in the blank: The extent to which a study measures what it intends to measure is called
__________.

Answer: Validity

Rationale: Validity ensures accuracy of findings.



A meta-analysis combines data from multiple RCTs. What is the main advantage?

A. Reduces sample size

B. Increases statistical power

C. Eliminates bias completely

D. Avoids ethical concerns


3

, Answer: B

Rationale: Larger combined samples improve reliability.



True/False: Convenience sampling enhances generalizability.

Answer: False

Rationale: It introduces bias and limits external validity.



A nurse reads a study with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. What does this imply?

A. 95% of participants were included

B. The result is always correct

C. The true value likely falls within the interval

D. No variability exists

Answer: C

Rationale: CI estimates precision of results.



Fill in the blank: The difference between experimental and control groups is called the
__________.

Answer: Effect size

Rationale: Effect size quantifies intervention impact.



A study reports high reliability. This means:

A. Results are accurate

B. Results are consistent and reproducible

C. Study is valid

D. No bias exists


4

Información del documento

Subido en
9 de julio de 2026
Número de páginas
43
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Desconocido
$16.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
ClementeO
3.7
(16)
Vendido
138
Seguidores
43
Artículos
5060
Última venta
1 día hace


Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes